The world didn’t agree to be normal this week, so we didn’t either. We hit the gas on a tour of some pretty strange headlines. Think Mothman pilgrimages in Appalachia, a Wisconsin town “terrorized” by turkeys, and a New York backyard dig that turns into a three‑week epic in search of a missing ring… that wasn’t even hers.

From there we lean into the macabre and the moral lines that blur in the dark: a grave robber selling bones online, a viral app that basically asks “Are You Dead” to check on solo travelers, and a Danish zoo requesting small‑pet donations as carnivore feed. We talk about why certain stories spark outrage until context arrives, and how attention economics—from “gay panda” rumors to wildlife selfie fails—keeps rewarding the most reckless behavior. If you’ve ever side‑eyed someone inching toward a bison for the ‘gram, you’ll feel seen.

We also wade into bioethics with the scientist who edited embryos to resist HIV, unpacking consent, risk, and the unintended consequences of germline edits. Then we detour into the cultural consumption of true crime at “The Final Meal,” a restaurant plating the last requests of infamous names alongside on‑theme cocktails. It’s part spectacle, part museum, and a perfect example of how we metabolize fear by ritualizing it. By the time we hit a stolen walrus relic and an Alaskan art student literally eating AI‑generated work in protest, one theme is clear: we’re drawn to the bizarre because it’s a pressure valve—humor, horror, and human curiosity all mixed together.

Join us for sharp banter, skeptical questions, and a reminder that the news cycle is stranger than fiction. If you laughed, cringed, or yelled “why,” share the show with a friend, hit follow, and drop your favorite offbeat headline for a future episode. We read everything—send yours our way and let’s get weird together.

email: boomerandgenxer@gmail.com

The modern marketplace might be digital, but it still runs on human quirks. We dive into the unruly charm of Facebook Marketplace, eBay, Craigslist, and Poshmark: the lightning-fast “Is this still available?” messages, the vanishing act after yes, and the bold requests to deliver a free item two hours away. From lowball offers on solid furniture to renegotiations sprung at pickup, we unpack why haggling works for some buyers, frustrates most sellers, and how to keep your sanity with clear rules and a firm walk-away point.

We compare platform cultures and tactics. Facebook Marketplace offers instant local reach but clutters your feed with sponsored storefronts. eBay remains a goldmine for vintage parts and niche gear, if you read seller ratings closely and double-check descriptions. Craigslist is still alive for big local hauls, and Poshmark can be a deal haven with hidden pitfalls, especially for technical apparel like motorcycle jackets with CE armor. We share practical checks anyone can use: reverse image search for suspicious photos, requests for timestamped pics, and simple screening to separate a real seller from a recycled catalog image.

Scams get special attention. If a Murphy bed is priced at a fraction of retail with a deposit required to “hold,” it’s a trap. We outline the red flags—Zelle-only requests, impossible urgency, inconsistent photo backgrounds—and safer playbooks for cash-and-carry transactions. We also get real about safety: meet in public, bring a buddy for heavy items, share profiles and locations with a friend, and don’t risk it for a cheap bowl. And yes, there’s comic relief: a now-legendary listing for a “Haunted Goat” that “feels very dark and heavy” and “needs re-homing ASAP.” Come for the tips, stay for the stories, and leave with sharper instincts.

If you enjoyed this conversation, follow the show, share it with a friend who loves a good deal, and leave a quick review—what’s your wildest buy-or-sell story?

email: boomerandgenxer@gmail.com

A cold snap and a few laughs set the stage for a charged, honest look at protest: what the First Amendment protects, what “peaceful” really means, and how quickly crowds can tip from calm to chaos. We trade views on caged protest zones, arrests at sit-ins, and whether restrictions honor safety or silence dissent. The heart of the debate lands on neutrality—if rules keep order, they must be applied fairly or they erode trust.

We move through history and headlines, contrasting disciplined nonviolence with scenes of destruction that damage communities and drown out the message. Kneeling during the national anthem and flag burning become lenses on symbolic speech, patriotism, and personal boundaries. One of us embraces the right without loving the act; the other defends the act as a potent, nonviolent message. We also call out a common contradiction: condemning the burning of a lawfully owned flag while flying altered versions at home. Free speech cuts both ways, and consistency matters.

The conversation widens to immigration protests and the system itself. If deportations feel unjust, push for policy that creates faster, legal paths to citizenship rather than turning neighbors into targets. Throughout, we return to a shared standard: protect people, property, and access to help; protect the right to assemble and speak; and put the energy where it counts—on laws, not on each other. If a gathering starts to turn, look for the helpers; if you can’t find them, become one.

If this conversation pushed your thinking, tap follow, share it with a friend who loves a good civil argument, and leave a review with your take on what makes a protest truly peaceful. Your voice helps others find the show.

email: boomerandgenxer@gmail.com

The sunlight was still pouring in when we hit record, and maybe that’s why we went straight for a topic that needs daylight: how the criminal legal system rewards money, speed, and storytelling over facts. We talk candidly about what we see on crime shows versus what happens in real courtrooms—delays that weaken memory, circumstantial evidence presented as certainty, and the way a confident voice or a blue suit can sway a jury more than the record. It’s witty, a little raw, and focused on the real costs hidden behind legal jargon.

From bail that locks people into months of pretrial limbo, to public defenders drowning under impossible caseloads, we map how inequality compounds over time. A missed paycheck becomes a job loss; a missed court date becomes a violation; a probation fee becomes a barrier to housing. We compare standards of proof—beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal trials versus preponderance of evidence in civil cases—and show how narrative gaps get filled with performance, not proof. Appeals and exonerations arrive too late to restore years lost to thin evidence and strong theatrics.

We also share on-the-ground experience from investigations and paralegal work, and we dig into jury selection, media exposure, and the psychology of credibility. The takeaway is simple and hard: facts are emotionless, but people aren’t, and the system often runs on perception. That’s why we argue for a language shift—call it the criminal legal system, not the justice system—so we can see it clearly and fix what’s broken: caseloads, bail practices, timelines, and juror training. If you’re ready to question the story you’re being told, press play, then tell us what reform you’d start with. Subscribe, share with a friend who loves true crime, and leave a review to keep this conversation moving.

email: boomerandgenxer@gmail.com

Wind and sun feel free—until you follow the wires and trucks back to the mine. We dive into the messy middle of “green” energy: where panels get built, how turbines retire, and who pays the hidden bill when incentives, grants, and labels make the math look cleaner than the supply chain really is. From a small town’s solar canopies over parking lots to the realities of rural co-ops without rebates, we map the gap between feel-good tech and the full lifecycle cost.

We talk through the big levers shaping adoption—utility incentives, the Inflation Reduction Act, and greenwashing that rewards partial fixes. Along the way, we examine turbine blade disposal, nacelle oil and wiring, and the wildlife impacts that come with large wind and solar projects. Cheap new generation can still carry hidden environmental and social price tags when end-of-life and upstream emissions aren’t part of the spreadsheet.

None of this is a case against cleaner power—it’s an argument for better design and honest accounting. Rooftops and parking canopies beat greenfield sprawl. Standardized components and built-in recyclability make decommissioning safer and cheaper. Policies that pay for verified outcomes—not buzzwords—drive real gains in air quality, grid resilience, and public health. Join us as we sort the tradeoffs, ask harder questions, and sketch a plan that actually protects people, water, and habitats.

If this conversation made you think, follow the show, share it with a friend, and send us your take. Your ideas help shape what we explore next—subscribe and leave a review to keep the debate honest and the dialogue moving.

email: boomerandgenxer@gmail.com

New year energy fades fast when goals are vague and life gets loud. We decided to flip the script and design changes that actually survive February by shrinking ambitions into small, repeatable actions you can fit into a busy week. With a mix of humor, real failure stats, and lived experience across generations, we map out how to protect your time, guard your energy, and build momentum without going all or nothing.

We start by tackling the health triad—sleep, hydration, and food—and why sleep is the quiet lever that moves everything else. From shift work struggles to insomnia, we share tactics that reduce friction: wind‑down windows, caffeine cutoffs, and anchor habits that make drinking water and eating less processed food automatic.

Then we zoom into personal growth and boundaries. Instead of big, hazy resolutions, we pick one learning lane and put it in a tight daily container: ten pages, fifteen minutes, one micro‑project.

We round things out with digital wellness and decluttering. That means pruning notifications, archiving stale chats, cleaning a single surface at a time, and using reset points to keep order without a weekend purge.

If you’re ready for a year built on tiny, sticky wins instead of big promises that melt by mid‑January, hit play and make your first change today. Subscribe, share this episode with a friend who needs a reset, and leave a quick review to tell us your one small goal for the week.

email: boomerandgenxer@gmail.com

A joke, a clink of glasses, and then a hard turn into the question that lingers behind so many headlines: how well do we really know the people we love? We trace a line from household secrets to celebrity tragedies, unpacking why cases like Marvin Gaye, Phil Hartman, and OJ Simpson command the spotlight while similar horrors in our own communities barely register. It’s a conversation about attention, empathy, and the uncomfortable truth that intimacy doesn’t guarantee clarity.

We explore the messy overlap of psychology, media narratives, and family dynamics. From the Menendez brothers to Jennifer Hudson’s loss and Charlize Theron’s self-defense story, we examine how fame amplifies grief and distorts our empathy map.

This is not a true-crime recap; it’s a call to re-center our attention on prevention and care close to home. We share practical warning signs to watch for—escalating control, isolation, threats, obsessive jealousy, financial coercion—and simple, real steps to support loved ones without fueling more harm. The takeaway is simple but demanding: love your people, listen with intention, and act early. If this conversation resonates, subscribe, share it with a friend, and leave a review with the one insight you want others to hear. Your voice helps more listeners find the show and, maybe, find help when it matters most.

email: boomerandgenxer@gmail.com

Ever wonder how a confident expert can sway a jury with evidence that later falls apart? We dive into the uneasy fault line between courtroom certainty and scientific reality, exploring why some techniques—like polygraphs, bite mark analysis, and even traditional fingerprint comparisons—have led to devastating mistakes.

DNA stands out as a powerful anchor when collected and interpreted with care. We talk CODIS, next-generation sequencing for degraded samples, and where genetic genealogy and phenotyping can help or mislead. Throughout, our focus stays on error rates, independent review, clear uncertainty statements, and a cultural shift from “trust the examiner” to “trust the validated method.” We end with practical resources—the Marshall Project and the Innocence Project—for listeners who want to explore how junk science has shaped real cases and what stronger standards could fix.

If this conversation challenges how you think about evidence and justice, share it with a friend, follow the show, and leave a quick review telling us the one forensic method you now question most.

email: boomerandgenxer@gmail.com