Written, Produced & Created by Chad James.

Episode 318 - In this episode, we delve into the shocking conclusion of the Lawyer X scandal that sent shockwaves through Victoria's justice system. Brace yourself for a wild ride filled with deceit, conflicts of interest, and corruption that rocked the very foundations of the criminal justice system. But before we unravel the latest twist, we rewind and shed some light on the central figure of this scandal, Nicola Gobbo, also known as Lawyer X.

We then shift our focus to New South Wales, where the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) drops a bombshell report. Former premier Gladys Berejiklian finds herself entangled in "serious corrupt conduct" in connection to government grants, all while keeping her relationship with then Wagga Wagga MP Daryl Maguire under wraps. The report, delivered to parliament almost two years after Berejiklian's resignation, exposes a conflict of interest that could have influenced her public duty.

And finally, prepare for an explosive revelation as we uncover the largest tax fraud scam in Australian history. Through a combination of damning text messages, secret recordings, and a hidden camera, the Australian Federal Police unveil a sophisticated $105 million tax fraud scheme. We dive into the details, exploring the 28,000 pages of documents and 70 hours of intercepted phone, video, and audio material that have now been brought to light outside the courtroom. Thanks to a riveting Four Corners investigation that aired last Monday night, listeners will experience this evidence firsthand.

Join us as we navigate the treacherous depths of these scandals, unveiling the truth behind the Lawyer X debacle, exposing corruption in the highest echelons of political power, and witnessing the groundbreaking evidence that brought down a massive tax fraud operation. This is a podcast episode you won't want to miss.

Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating!

Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, ⁠Instagram⁠, ⁠TikTok⁠ & ⁠YouTube⁠.

Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

(0:00) Intro

(4:25) Lawyer X Background

(14:45) How it Unfolded

(28:36) Rage Quit!

(34:37) Daniel Andrews' Answer

(44:27) Victoria's Gangland Problem

(55:24) Police Powers

(59:30) Gladys v ICAC

(1:03:33) Is Gladys OK?

(1:10:52) The Phone Taps

(1:13:16) ATO Scam Uncovered

(1:26:04) The Bikies Won

(1:32:25) Final Thoughts

Written, Produced and Created by Chad James

Episode 317 - In this episode, we delve into a heated legal dispute involving independent MP Alex Greenwich and the controversial leader of NSW One Nation, Mark Latham. Greenwich has taken legal action against Latham, seeking aggravated damages on grounds of defamation. The incident stems from a tweet in which Latham made graphic and homophobic accusations, targeting Greenwich and his alleged involvement in what he described as "disgusting" sexual activities.

The tweet was posted by Mr Latham in March as a response to an earlier remark made by Mr Greenwich, who had referred to Latham as a "disgusting human being." This comment was made in the aftermath of an incident where LGBTQI protesters were assaulted outside a public forum where Latham was speaking.

Although Latham did delete the tweet shortly after, he staunchly refused to offer an apology. This refusal has escalated the matter, leading to a legal battle between the two prominent figures. Join us as we explore the nuances of this high-profile case, analysing the legal ramifications and potential implications for both individuals involved.

WARNING: Sensitive Content

Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating!

Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠, Instagram, TikTok & YouTube.

Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

(0:00) Intro

(3:28) Chess Game

(6:13) Does Greenwich Have a Case?

(9:40) Hate Speech

(12:27) Is it Defamation?

(20:35) Is it a Crime?

(28:41) Will Latham Settle?

Written, Produced and Created by Chad James

Episode 316 - In this episode we delve into a dramatic sequence of events that unfolded in the Senate. Yesterday, Senator Thorpe utilised parliamentary privilege to make serious accusations against Liberal Senator David Van, alleging sexual harassment and assault. Senator Van promptly denied the allegations, but later Senator Thorpe withdrew her claims.

Today, in a continuation of her Senate address, Senator Thorpe shared further details of unsettling encounters with unnamed men in the parliamentary environment that left her feeling unsafe. Responding to Senator Thorpe's remarks from the previous night Opposition Leader, Peter Dutton, revealed that another allegation had been brought to his attention. Following a meeting with Senator Van, Mr. Dutton advised him that he would no longer be a member of the Liberal Party Room.

Join us as we explore the ramifications of these grave allegations, their impact on the political landscape, and the consequences for Senator Van's future within the party.

Guest: Niko is a Sydney-based lawyer, software engineer & regular contributor on Chad Theory

Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating!

Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

(0:00) Intro

(2:25) What Happened?

(5:32) The Allegations

(7:42) Harassment or Assault?

(12:37) Is Lidia Thorpe Fit for Parliament?

(15:36) Checkmate!

(18:22) Peter Dutton's Response

(23:58) Toxic Politics

(29:07) Elite Privileges

(32:56) Predictions...

Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 315 - Finance Minster, Katy Gallagher, may have misled Parliament on a crucial fact regarding her knowledge of the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins. During a Senate estimates hearing in 2021, Gallagher claimed she had no prior knowledge of the incident before Brittany Higgins made her shocking claims public in February 2021. However, it appears that Gallagher's own words contradict her statement to the Senate committee.

The truth came to light when Liberal cabinet minister Linda Reynolds, at the time, accused Gallagher of being aware of the allegations two weeks before they were aired on The Project on 15 Feb 2021. In response, Gallagher vehemently denied any knowledge, stating, "No one had any knowledge. How dare you." But recent revelations suggest otherwise.

Join Chad & Niko for up to date commentary on the Brittany Higgins, Dave sharaz & Lisa Wilkinson leaks, and what they mean for Bruce Lehrmann's upcoming defamation trial in the Federal Court.

Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating!

Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

(0:00) Intro

(2:36) Did Katy Gallagher Lie?

(9:46) Labor, Lies & More Lies...

(17:37) Do the Leaks Help Bruce Lehrmann?

(31:23) Brittany Higgins' Big Mistake

(35:52) What Leaks are Next?

Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 314 - Chad & Niko are joined by Sydney Lawyer, Rowena, to uncover the gripping story of Australia's most decorated living soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith, who recently suffered a devastating loss in the Federal Court after a five-year civil case against three newspapers and three journalists. In 2018, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, and The Canberra Times published articles containing allegations of unlawful killings in Afghanistan, SAS bullying, and domestic violence. The war veteran denied all wrongdoing and lodged 14 defamatory claims against the stories.

The most serious accusations, brought forward by publisher Nine Entertainment, implicated the soldier in six unlawful killings. Testimonies from numerous SAS soldiers, offering conflicting accounts of key missions, left the judge with a stark choice between irreconcilable narratives.

Join us as we dissect the aftermath of this high-stakes trial.

Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating!

Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

(0:00) Intro

(2:45) Why so Expensive?

(14:30) The Trial

(21:28) No Reputation Left...

(25:27) Secret Witnesses

(33:31) Substantial vs Contextual Truth

(36:42) Is he a War Criminal?

(45:15) The Truth vs Public Interest

(51:36) Could he Appeal?

(1:00:27) Who Made BRS?

(1:08:42) The Media's Fail...

(1:13:47) Criminal Proceedings

Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 313 - Chad, Niko & Liv dive into the latest developments surrounding the allegations made by Brittany Higgins against former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann. In a recent interview on 7NEWS Spotlight, Lehrmann vehemently denied the accusations of rape, providing his own version of events. This marked Lehrmann's first television appearance since Ms Higgins made her allegations public, making it a significant moment for many Australians seeking to hear his side of the story.

Meanwhile, the controversial leaking of private material related to Brittany Higgins has made its way into Bruce Lehrmann's Federal Court proceedings, where the court heard about the publication of an audio recording featuring Higgins, her partner David Sharaz, and two Network 10 journalists, including Lisa Wilkinson, along with text messages sent by Higgins to various parties.

Despite multiple outlets publishing this material over several weeks, the identity of the source remains unclear, adding a layer of intrigue to the ongoing saga. Furthermore, the Coalition is putting pressure on Finance Minister, Katy Gallagher, seeking an explanation for her testimony during Senate estimates. Text messages between Brittany Higgins and her partner, David Sharaz, have been released, suggesting contact with Gallagher days before the story broke, raising questions about the credibility of her evidence before the Senate Committee.

Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating!

Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

(0:00) Intro

(1:14) Lehrmann's Channel 7 Interview

(12:24) I Have Questions...

(19:47) The Higgins, Sharaz & Wilkinson Leak

(23:18) Federal Court Update

(31:55) Labor's Mean Girls

(37:37) Brittany Higgins' Payout

(43:47) Lehrmann v News Corp Settles

Written and Created by Chad James

Episode 312 - Chad & Liv delve into the compelling story of Kathleen Folbigg, who recently made headlines after being pardoned and released from prison following two decades behind bars. Convicted in 2003 for the deaths of her four children, Folbigg has steadfastly maintained her innocence throughout her trial and imprisonment.

Join us as we explore the shocking turn of events that led to her release. We'll examine the decision of New South Wales attorney general, Michael Daley, who based on the summary findings of an inquiry conducted by former state chief justice Thomas Bathurst, recommended that Folbigg be unconditionally pardoned and set free.

Through in-depth interviews and analysis, we'll uncover the reasons behind Bathurst's firm view of reasonable doubt regarding Folbigg's guilt for each offense she was originally tried for. What evidence or circumstances led to this dramatic reversal in the case? How did the public and legal community react to the decision?

With expert perspectives and insights into the investigation, we'll navigate the complexities of the Kathleen Folbigg case. Tune in as we explore the impact of the decision on Folbigg's life, the justice system, and society as a whole. From the heart-wrenching loss of four children to the aftermath of her release, this podcast sheds light on a case that has divided opinions and challenged our notions of guilt and innocence.

Don't forget to give us a 5-Star Rating!

Follow Chad on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Help to keep Chad Theory independent by making a one-off or recurring donation ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠via PayPal⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

(0:00) Free at Last!

(3:38) Pardoned, not Exonerated...

(8:39) Craig Folbigg Hits Back

(12:05) Follow the Science

(18:15) Is Folbigg Innocent?

(29:18) Was There Juror Misconduct?

(33:46) Predictions

Written and Created by Chad James