The Puttalyze Concept transforms short putting from guesswork into measurable physics. Most missed putts are not technical errors but miscalculations of gravity and time. Break is not determined by slope alone. It follows a simple physical law:

Break = Slope × Time

Slope provides the force. Time allows gravity to influence the ball. The longer the ball rolls, the more gravity can move it off line. Understanding and controlling time is therefore the key to precision.

Time as the Decisive Variable

Two forces dominate every putt: gravity and rolling friction. Gravity pulls the ball downhill, while friction slows it down. The balance between these forces defines how long the ball remains in motion — and therefore how much it breaks.

Softer putts break more because they roll longer. Faster greens increase break because reduced friction extends roll time. Longer putts break more due to greater duration. Downhill putts break more because gravity maintains velocity and extends exposure time. Every read must account for this time factor.

Target Speed – 3 Rotations Per Second

Puttalyze standardizes a target speed of 3 rps at the hole. At this speed, the ball uses the full effective capture width of approximately 3.5 inches. It resists early slope influence yet avoids excessive lip-outs. Too slow increases break and causes low-side misses. Too fast reduces effective hole size and increases bounce-outs. Speed consistency is non-negotiable.

High-Side Entry – The 2/3 Principle

The hole must be divided mentally into three horizontal sections. Only the upper two-thirds provide effective entry. A ball entering through the lower third is already moving away from the center due to slope. Therefore, the visual center is not the true target. On breaking putts, the effective entry point is always above center. High-side entry is mathematically superior.

Green Speed and Stimp

Green speed modifies time within the equation. Faster greens reduce friction, extend roll time, and increase break. Slower greens shorten roll time and reduce break. Stimp must therefore be integrated into every calculation. Ignoring green speed invalidates the read.

The Calculation Process

Step one is analysis: measure slope percentage, identify the fall line, determine green speed, and estimate distance.
Step two is calculation: apply the physics of time and slope interaction.
Step three is entry adjustment: aim for the upper two-thirds of the hole.
Step four is execution: deliver 3 rps at the hole. Without correct speed, the aim point collapses.

Slope and Fall Line

Slope acts as a multiplier. Steeper slopes require wider aim points due to increased gravitational pull. Underestimating slope guarantees low-side misses. The fall line defines gravity’s direction. Without identifying it, the calculation is incomplete.

Puttalyze removes emotion from putting and replaces it with structure. Control time. Respect slope. Enter high.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

This document provides a structured research foundation for a biographical podcast on legendary golf instructor John Jacobs. It calls for a comprehensive exploration of his journey from tour professional to one of the most influential coaches in golf history. Central to the narrative is his groundbreaking “Practical Golf” philosophy, which shifted instruction away from rigid swing models and toward understanding ball flight and impact.

Jacobs revolutionized coaching with a diagnostic, impact-first approach that contrasted sharply with traditional technique-driven schools. His core belief — “The Ball Never Lies” — emphasized analyzing the ball’s flight to identify cause-and-effect relationships in the swing. Rather than focusing on how a swing looked, he prioritized what the ball actually did.

His methodology laid the foundation for modern instruction. The outline highlights clear parallels between his principles and today’s launch monitor data as well as contemporary biomechanics. Concepts such as impact variables, ball-flight laws, and feedback-driven correction were embedded in his teaching decades before technology could measure them precisely. For this reason, many modern elite coaches are considered indirect descendants of his philosophy.

The framework also emphasizes Jacobs’ institutional legacy, including the founding of his international golf schools and his major influence within the European PGA. These contributions helped standardize coaching education and spread his analytical approach worldwide.

The document clarifies that it is a research structure rather than a full biography. It instructs researchers to investigate areas such as notable players he coached, the detailed content and long-term influence of his book Practical Golf, and his personal characteristics as a mentor and leader. However, those specifics are not contained in the source itself.

Key principles identified as the backbone of his philosophy include:

• The Ball Never Lies – ball flight reveals swing truth
• Cause and Effect – every shot result has a measurable reason
• Ball-Flight Laws – trajectory as the primary diagnostic tool
• Impact-First Thinking – understanding collision before motion
• Outcome Over Aesthetics – function over visual style

Jacobs’ interpretation of these ideas directly anticipates modern launch monitor analysis. Today’s technology measures face angle, path, speed, and spin; Jacobs used observation and logic to reach the same conclusions. His approach transformed coaching from art toward science, establishing him as a pioneer of modern performance analysis.

Ultimately, this outline serves as a roadmap for telling the story of a coach whose ideas still shape how the game is taught — blending factual history, technical insight, and expert discussion to capture his lasting impact on golf.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

This body of research examines how elite golfers generate clubhead speed through the coordinated use of ground reaction forces (GRF) and torque. Using force plates, biomechanical models track weight transfer, center of pressure (COP), and the interaction between the feet and the ground. A key concept is the X-factor—the rotational separation between hips and shoulders—which stores elastic energy and contributes to power. Compared to amateurs, elite players convert lateral motion into rotation more efficiently by stabilizing the lead leg and applying braking forces. Neuromotor studies further suggest that simplified trunk control improves coordination and consistency.

The Three Components of Power

Elite golfers generate power by applying GRF in three dimensions, executed in a precise sequence:

• Horizontal Force (Mediolateral): Drives the lateral pressure shift toward the lead foot early in the downswing, creating a stable base for rotation.

• Rotational Force / Torque (Anteroposterior): Produced by a force couple—trail foot pushing forward and lead foot pushing backward. This shearing action is the most efficient way to create rotational speed due to larger lever arms.

• Vertical Force: Generated by “posting up” on the lead leg. The resulting upward reaction force extends the lead side and accelerates the club through impact. Elite long hitters can exceed 200% of body weight in vertical force.

Kinetic Sequence

Efficiency depends on timing, not just force magnitude:

1. Horizontal force peaks first during transition.
2. Torque peaks next as the pelvis and torso rotate (around lead arm parallel).
3. Vertical force peaks last, just before impact.

The Braking Effect

Elite players decelerate the lower body to transfer energy up the kinetic chain. Lead-leg braking is approximately 40% stronger than the trail leg, and even higher in long-drive athletes. This converts linear momentum into rotational speed. Amateurs often lose power by sliding instead of stabilizing.

Elite vs. Amateur Differences

Professionals apply forces more simultaneously, load the trail leg more effectively in the backswing, and maintain optimal separation between center of mass (COM) and COP to maximize rotational leverage.

Summary of the Elite Power Pattern

1. Load pressure into the trail foot in the backswing.
2. Shift pressure horizontally to the lead foot in transition.
3. Apply a simultaneous shearing action to create torque.
4. Push vertically with the lead leg to brake the body and release the club.

• ⁠📺 The Explainer⁠

• www.Golf247.eu⁠

Ground Reaction Force (GRF) is presented as the true engine of the golf swing, driving both speed and stability. Rather than starting with rotation, elite swings rely on how effectively the golfer interacts with the ground to convert linear pressure into angular velocity. GRF is described as the “conversation between the body and the ground,” governing sequence, timing, and control throughout the swing.

Efficient swings follow a strict coaching hierarchy: Sequence → Timing → Magnitude. The correct force sequence is lateral, then rotational, then vertical. Golfers first shift pressure toward the lead side, then create torque, and finally “post up” vertically. Timing is critical: force peaks must occur before impact, while the club is still approaching delivery. Late force application is ineffective, comparable to accelerating after passing a corner. While peak force matters, elite players distinguish themselves through impulse—the ability to apply meaningful force over time without losing structure.

A central concept is the lead-side anchor, which functions as both an accelerator and a braking system. By stabilizing the body through lateral, rotational, and vertical forces just before impact, the lead side creates an “anchor moment” that allows the club to release freely. Without this anchor, the swing becomes chaotic, forcing compensations such as stalling, flipping, or early extension.

GRF also generates torque through coordinated, opposing forces from both feet, often explained using the “bottle cap” model. Relying on only one mechanism—typically a heel-to-toe push—produces raw speed but lacks stability. Balanced contribution from both feet is required to stay centered and control the strike.

Common faults like early extension are framed not as random errors, but as natural consequences of poor force sequencing. Trail-side dominance, late vertical force peaks, or failure to brace against the club’s pull push the pelvis toward the ball and force the body to stand up. Consistent ball striking improves when the lead side “wins” the battle by providing a stable braking-and-posting platform through impact.

Ultimately, consistent power comes from completing major ground-force events early, stacking lateral, rotational, and vertical forces into a small pre-impact window, and training impulse rather than short, violent force spikes. When the lower body prepares the release instead of reacting to it, the swing gains speed, stability, and repeatability.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

Viele von euch wissen, wer ich bin. Aber die wenigsten wissen wirklich, was mein Hintergrund im Golf ist. Mit dieser E-Mail möchte ich euch deshalb kurz erklären, wer ich bin, was ich in den letzten Jahren gemacht habe und warum ich heute dort stehe, wo ich golftechnisch stehe – mit dem Wissen und der Erfahrung, die ich mir über Jahrzehnte aufgebaut habe.

Ich habe das Gefühl, dass viele von euch meine golferische Karriere gar nicht im Detail kennen. Genau das möchte ich hier ändern.

Mein Ansatz: Der Ball lügt nicht

Mein gesamter Unterricht basiert auf einem einfachen Prinzip: „The Ball Never Lies.“

Es geht nicht darum, wie dein Schwung aussieht. Es geht darum, was dein Schlägerblatt im Treffmoment liefert. Der Ballflug ist die einzige objektive Wahrheit im Golf.

Während im traditionellen Unterricht oft statische Positionen kontrolliert wurden, arbeite ich anders. Ich analysiere zuerst deinen Ballflug – Startrichtung, Kurve, Spin – und leite daraus ab, was im Impact tatsächlich passiert ist. Wir arbeiten also rückwärts vom Ergebnis zur Ursache.

Ein Schwung darf unkonventionell aussehen. Wenn die Schlagfläche im richtigen Verhältnis zur Schwungbahn steht, funktioniert er.

Gefühl vs. Realität

Du kennst das: Du glaubst, du machst etwas – aber in Wahrheit passiert etwas ganz anderes.

Genau hier setze ich an. Ich arbeite mit messbarer Realität statt mit Meinungen. Wir verändern nur das, was den Impact wirklich beeinflusst. Kein Ratespiel. Keine Vermutungen.

Biomechanik & Bodenreaktionskräfte

Leistung entsteht nicht aus den Händen. Leistung entsteht vom Boden.

Nach Newtons drittem Gesetz erzeugst du Kraft, indem du gegen den Boden drückst. Wenn deine Sequenz – vom Boden über Hüfte und Rumpf bis in den Schläger – nicht stimmt, leidet dein Ballflug.

Deshalb arbeite ich seit Jahren intensiv mit Biomechanik, Kinematik und modernen Messsystemen. Lange bevor Launch-Monitore Standard wurden, habe ich genau diese physikalischen Zusammenhänge unterrichtet.

Die Ball Roll Laws – Putten ist Physik

Auch auf dem Grün gilt: Der Ball lügt nicht.

Putten ist keine Kunstform. Es ist Kollisionsphysik. Entscheidend sind:

• Abflugwinkel

• Seitenspin

• Rutschphase

• Reiner Roll

Du lernst, die Rutschphase zu minimieren, Seitenspin zu eliminieren und deinen Putter objektiv auf deine Mechanik abzustimmen. Mit hochpräziser 3D-Technologie wird Putten messbar – nicht mystisch.

Mein Golf-ManifestÜber die Jahre habe ich klare Regeln entwickelt, die dein Score sofort stabilisieren:

Fairway First – Wenn du keinen Driver spielst, musst du das Fairway treffen.
Wedge = Grün – Mit einem Wedge gehört der Ball aufs Grün.
Vermeide die Dead Zone (30–80 m) – Spiele volle Distanzen oder unter 30 Meter.
15-Yard-Sicherheitsregel – Erforderliche Carry-Distanz + 15 Yards = Mindestanforderung.

Wenn ein Hindernis 200 Yards Carry verlangt, brauchst du eine verlässliche 215-Yard-Distanz. Keine Hoffnungsschläge. Keine „Vielleicht-treffe-ich-ihn-perfekt“-Entscheidungen.

Kenne deine ZahlenDu spielst nicht deine Bestleistung. Du spielst deinen Durchschnitt.

Deine Carry-Distanzen müssen auf wiederholbaren Schlägen basieren – 7 bis 8 von 10 Treffern. Diese Zahlen gehören ins Yardage-Book. Sie sind dein visueller Vertrag mit dir selbst.

Warum ich heute dort stehe, wo ich stehe

Alles, was ich in den letzten Jahren aufgebaut habe – von Biomechanik über Ballflug-Analyse bis hin zu 3D-Putting-Systemen – basiert auf einem Prinzip:

1. Golf ist kein Spiel der Hoffnung.
2. Golf ist Physik.
3. Golf ist Disziplin.
4. Golf ist messbare Realität.

Und genau deshalb stehe ich heute dort, wo ich stehe – mit einem klaren, datenbasierten System, das nicht auf Meinungen beruht, sondern auf überprüfbaren Fakten.

Ich hoffe, es gefällt euch, etwas mehr über meinen Hintergrund und meine golferische Entwicklung zu erfahren.

In professional golf, the scorecard is far more than an administrative document. It is a binding declaration of personal responsibility, reflecting the sport’s unique reliance on honesty and self-governance. While tournament committees calculate totals, the player alone is responsible for the accuracy of each hole score once the card is signed. Under long-standing principles of the Rules of Golf, this responsibility carries strict liability, meaning intent is irrelevant when an error occurs.

History is filled with examples showing how unforgiving this system can be. Submitting a score lower than actually taken has traditionally resulted in automatic disqualification, regardless of circumstances. Legends such as Mark Roe and Jesper Parnevik experienced this in painful fashion at the 2003 Open Championship. A simple failure to exchange scorecards led both players to sign for scores recorded on the wrong cards. Despite correct hole-by-hole numbers and no competitive advantage gained, Roe was disqualified after a brilliant 67 that left him in contention for the Claret Jug. The controversy ultimately forced the R&A and USGA to amend Rule 6-6d, allowing committees to waive disqualification for this specific clerical error.

By contrast, signing for a higher score than actually made is permitted, but the higher total must stand. The most famous example is Roberto De Vicenzo at the 1968 Masters. After his marker mistakenly recorded a par instead of a birdie, De Vicenzo signed without noticing. He was not disqualified, but the higher score cost him a playoff and a chance at the Green Jacket—an outcome that became a defining lesson in vigilance.

Where golf draws an absolute line is deliberate manipulation. The 1992 case of Johan Tumba remains the clearest example. During European Tour Qualifying School, Tumba altered his scorecard after it had been signed. The Tour treated the matter as fraud, employing forensic techniques such as ESDA paper analysis and ink chromatography, reportedly with assistance from Scotland Yard. The evidence proved intentional alteration, resulting in a ten-year ban (later reduced), and a permanent stain on his reputation.

Severe sanctions for cheating are rare but decisive. David Robertson received a 20-year ban in 1985 for repeatedly moving his ball marker to gain advantage, the harshest punishment in European Tour history. Later cases, such as Elliot Saltman, resulted in shorter suspensions, reflecting modern legal constraints but the same moral standard.

Together, these cases explain why the scorecard remains golf’s most powerful symbol. It can define championships, end careers, and confer either lasting respect or enduring stigma—because in golf, integrity is not assumed, it is signed.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

The steady increase in driving distance in professional golf is the result of a combined evolution in equipment technology, data-driven optimization, and athletic performance. Since 1980, average driving distance on the PGA Tour has grown from roughly 260 yards to nearly 300 yards, reshaping how the game is played and how courses are designed.

A major driver of this change has been equipment innovation. The transition from persimmon wood to titanium drivers allowed for larger clubhead volumes and higher forgiveness, increasing ball speed on both centered and off-center strikes. The introduction of multi-layer, solid-core golf balls around 2000 further amplified distance by reducing driver spin while maintaining control in the short game. Advances in graphite shaft design also enabled higher swing speeds through optimized weight, flex, and torque profiles.

The rise of launch monitors marked a turning point, shifting golf from feel-based instruction to measurable physics. Data revealed that optimal distance comes from higher launch angles paired with lower spin rates. Modern players now swing with a positive angle of attack, producing more efficient launch conditions. While clubhead speed on tour has increased modestly, ball speed has risen significantly, highlighting improved energy transfer and higher smash factors.

At the same time, professional golfers have evolved into high-performance athletes. Inspired largely by Tiger Woods, strength training, biomechanics, and speed development became standard. Ground reaction forces, kinematic sequencing, and torso–pelvis separation (the “X-Factor”) are now central to power generation. Players like Bryson DeChambeau pushed this further through mass gain and neuromuscular speed training, reaching unprecedented clubhead and ball speeds.

These developments also changed strategy. Statistical models such as Strokes Gained show that distance provides a measurable scoring advantage, encouraging aggressive “bomb and gouge” play. Modern equipment reduces the penalty for misses, making wedges from the rough statistically preferable to longer irons from the fairway.

In response, governing bodies have introduced new regulations, including the 2028 golf ball rollback. By increasing testing speed and tightening launch conditions, manufacturers will be forced to design balls that fly shorter for elite players, while recreational golfers are expected to see minimal distance loss.

Ultimately, the distance boom reflects an ongoing tension between technological progress and preserving the strategic challenge and sustainability of the game.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

The February 2026 professional golf calendar highlighted a rapidly evolving, multi-polar ecosystem in which traditional tour boundaries are becoming increasingly fluid. The week featured headline victories, major policy shifts, and clear evidence that player movement between tours is no longer exceptional but structural.

High-profile wins defined the competitive narrative. On the PGA Tour, Chris Gotterup captured the WM Phoenix Open with a playoff victory in Scottsdale, overpowering the field with modern length and aggression. In Saudi Arabia, Elvis Smylie announced himself on the global stage by winning on debut at LIV Golf’s season opener in Riyadh, defeating Jon Rahm with a record-setting performance. Meanwhile, Patrick Reed continued his dominant return to the DP World Tour, adding multiple victories that have rapidly restored his world ranking and competitive relevance.

A landmark institutional shift accompanied these results. The Official World Golf Ranking has now begun awarding points to top finishers in LIV Golf events, providing players with a pathway to maintain ranking status and major eligibility. Alongside LIV’s move to a 72-hole format and revised prize distribution across all teams, this decision signals growing normalization between rival tours.

Player mobility is now reshaping the sport. The DP World Tour has emerged as a strategic bridge for reintegration into the PGA Tour ecosystem. Reed’s case is the clearest example: after leaving LIV Golf at the end of 2025, he is competing full-time in Europe in 2026, where victories at the Hero Dubai Desert Classic and Qatar Masters have effectively secured him a top-10 Race to Dubai finish. Historically, around 1,900–2,200 points are required to earn one of the available PGA Tour cards; Reed’s current total of approximately 2,260 points makes his return for 2027 a near certainty.

In contrast, Brooks Koepka followed a different route, gaining faster access through the PGA Tour’s Returning Member Program due to recent major success. Other former LIV players without similar credentials remain subject to longer waiting periods.

LIV Golf itself is redefining its identity. Once centered on established stars, the league is now aggressively recruiting young elite talent, including top amateurs willing to forgo traditional pathways. Smylie’s immediate success has validated this approach and strengthened LIV’s claim as a viable competitive platform rather than a closed alternative circuit.

Across all tours, a new player archetype is asserting itself. Power-driven, tactically aggressive golfers like Gotterup are challenging established hierarchies, while consistent performers such as Scottie Scheffler continue to set the benchmark for sustained excellence.

Overall, early 2026 shows professional golf moving away from rigid separation toward a fluid system. LIV Golf is gaining legitimacy, the DP World Tour is a crucial conduit, and the PGA Tour faces pressure both from returning stars and a new generation of high-velocity talent.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu