The Pro V1 and Pro V1x are both premium, tour-level golf balls, yet they are engineered with distinct performance profiles. The differences are not cosmetic; they are built into the core construction, compression, aerodynamics, spin behavior, and overall flight window. Choosing between them depends on launch characteristics, spin tendencies, and preferred feel.

Flight and Trajectory

The Pro V1 is designed to produce a mid-flight, penetrating trajectory. It typically launches slightly lower than the Pro V1x and maintains a stable, controlled ball flight. This makes it well suited for players who already generate height naturally or who struggle with excessive spin and ballooning in windy conditions.

The Pro V1x is engineered for a higher launch and a steeper descent angle. The added peak height helps maximize carry distance and improves stopping power on firm greens. Players who need help keeping the ball in the air, particularly with long irons, often benefit from this higher flight window.

Spin Profile

Off the driver, both models are designed to keep spin relatively low for optimal distance. The Pro V1 generally spins slightly less, supporting a flatter, more penetrating driver flight.

The separation becomes more noticeable with irons and wedges. The Pro V1x generates more spin on full iron shots and approach shots into the green. This increased spin creates a steeper landing angle and greater stopping power. Around the greens, both balls feature a cast urethane cover for high short-game spin, but the Pro V1x tends to produce marginally more check on wedge shots.

Construction and Compression

The Pro V1 uses a three-piece construction with a single solid core. This structure contributes to its softer overall compression and smoother feel at impact.

The Pro V1x features a four-piece, dual-core design. The dual-core configuration increases overall compression and creates a firmer feel. This construction also supports its higher launch and increased iron spin characteristics.

In compression testing, the Pro V1 typically measures in the high-80s to low-90s range. The Pro V1x generally measures in the high-90s, making it noticeably firmer.

Feel and Feedback

Feel differences are primarily related to compression and internal structure rather than the cover, as both models use a similar cast urethane material.

The Pro V1 delivers a softer sensation on full shots and off the putter face, often described as muted and smooth.

The Pro V1x provides firmer, more pronounced feedback at impact. Some players prefer this “solid” response because it offers clearer auditory and tactile feedback.

Player Fit

Choose the Pro V1 if you prefer a softer feel, want a slightly lower ball flight, or need to reduce spin.

Choose the Pro V1x if you prefer a firmer feel, need a higher launch, and want additional iron and wedge spin for maximum stopping power.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

This framework outlines the philosophy of Danish instructor Henrik Jentsch, whose teaching shifted golf instruction from swing aesthetics to impact physics. His central maxim — “The Ball Never Lies” — replaced model-based swing ideals with objective ball-flight analysis. What matters is not how the swing looks, but what the clubface delivers at impact.

From Positions to Impact Truth

Traditional instruction focused on static checkpoints. Jentsch reversed the process. He analyzed start direction, curvature and spin to diagnose impact conditions. Instead of prescribing ideal positions, he worked backwards from ball flight. A swing could look unconventional yet function perfectly if the face-to-path relationship was correct.

Feel vs. Real

Jentsch addressed the gap between what players feel and what actually happens. Ball flight became the final judge. His descriptive model relied on measurable reality rather than instructor opinion, adjusting only what influenced impact variables.

Biomechanics and Ground Forces

His work integrated kinematics and Ground Reaction Forces. Power originates from pushing against the ground (Newton’s Third Law). Faulty ball flights often reflect breakdowns in sequencing — inefficient energy transfer from ground to torso to club. This body-driven model replaced hand manipulation and anticipated today’s launch monitor era.

The Ball Roll Laws

Applying impact physics to putting, Jentsch reframed putting as collision science. The key variables: launch angle, side spin, skid phase and true roll.

• Minimize skid, maximize immediate forward roll

• Eliminate side spin through square face-to-path delivery

• Fit loft, lie and weight objectively to stroke mechanics

Using high-precision 3D systems, putting became measurable rather than mystical.

The 2026 Golf Manifesto

Jentsch introduced four strict scoring rules designed to remove emotional decision-making:

1. Fairway First – If you don’t hit driver, you must hit the fairway.

2. Wedge = Green – Any wedge must finish on the green.

3. Avoid the Dead Zone (30–80 yds) – Play to full yardages or inside 30.

4. 15-Yard Safety Rule – Required carry + 15 yards = minimum capability.

Example: A 200-yard carry demands a reliable 215-yard average carry. No “max” swings allowed. If your stock carry doesn’t meet the number, you must lay up.

Know Your Numbers

Carry distances must reflect repeatable shots, not perfect strikes. Outliers are removed. The stock number — hit 7–8 times out of 10 — becomes the decision baseline. These numbers are written into the yardage book as a visual contract.

Conclusion

Jentsch replaced guesswork with measurement. Ball flight became the only objective truth in a subjective game. His methods anticipated the data era and remain foundational in modern biomechanics, launch monitor coaching and AI-driven analysis.

Golf, in his system, is no longer about hope — it is about physics, discipline and measurable reality.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

In this technical overview, Henrik Jentsch presents a golf instruction system built on biomechanics, perceptual recalibration, and measurable impact science. His philosophy is clear: “We do not guess. We measure.” The swing is not treated as an artistic mystery but as a system that can be engineered for precision, efficiency, and longevity.

The method begins with correcting visual alignment. Many golfers believe they are square to the target when, in reality, they are biased left or right. Through calibration drills, players learn to align the shaft and clubface accurately—even if the correct position initially feels uncomfortable. This recalibration of perception is foundational. Before mechanics improve, the brain must accept reality over feel.

Central to the system is the concept that the release organizes the body. Unlike approaches that focus first on footwork or rotation, Jentsch applies a cause-and-effect biomechanical model: the hands determine delivery, and delivery dictates body response. When the release point is corrected, the lower body reorganizes naturally. Weight shifts forward, the lead side stabilizes, and the kinematic sequence remains intact—without forced movements. The clubface squares dynamically as a consequence, not through manipulation.

Structural integrity is equally important. The method manages side bend carefully to protect the spine while maintaining power. Too little side bend produces steep, over-the-top transitions and slicing patterns. Too much side bend overloads the lumbar spine, especially the L4–L5 region, increasing injury risk. The goal is structural intelligence: balancing power, efficiency, and long-term physical health.

Impact is considered the only moment that truly matters. The system evaluates performance through ten measurable impact factors:

1. Horizontal contact (heel–center–toe)
2. Vertical contact (thin–center–fat)
3. Face angle
4. Dynamic loft
5. Gear effect
6. Swing path
7. Attack angle
8. Low point location
9. Low point depth
10. Clubhead speed

By refining the release and controlling shaft plane, players directly influence face orientation, path direction, shaft lean, and low point control. The result is improved compression, tighter dispersion, and greater efficiency—without increasing physical effort.

The process concludes with structured repetition. Slow-motion drills and controlled integration build stable motor patterns that hold under pressure. Random practice is replaced by intelligent training.

Ultimately, the Henrik Jentsch Method replaces guesswork with science. Through perception correction, biomechanical sequencing, and measurable impact control, it constructs a sustainable, high-performance golf swing engineered for both excellence and longevity.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

The early 2026 professional golf season has been defined by major competitive, structural, and emotional storylines. The most powerful narrative emerged at LIV Golf Adelaide, where Anthony Kim captured his first victory in nearly sixteen years, transforming a tournament win into one of the sport’s most remarkable comeback stories.

Kim’s triumph ended a drought stretching back to the 2010 Houston Open. After disappearing from professional golf for over a decade due to injury and personal struggles, he returned to LIV in 2024 but initially struggled, even facing relegation. He secured his 2026 season through the LIV Promotions event and arrived in Adelaide after resolving last-minute visa complications. Despite limited preparation, he delivered a bogey-free final round 63, defeating Jon Rahm and Bryson DeChambeau by three strokes.

The victory coincided with a historic Official World Golf Ranking policy change. Beginning in 2026, LIV events now award ranking points, though classified as “Small Field Tournaments.” Points are distributed only to the top ten finishers. Kim earned approximately 23 ranking points for the win, vaulting from No. 847 to No. 203 overnight. One week earlier, a T-22 finish in Riyadh brought him zero points under the same system.

This structural shift reactivated a legitimate pathway to major championship qualification for LIV players. Automatic entry typically requires a Top 50 or Top 60 world ranking. Kim, now at No. 203, must climb roughly 140 positions. Under the top-10-only format, consistent mid-field finishes yield nothing. To realistically reach the Top 60, he likely needs two additional victories or multiple podium finishes.

The policy has sparked mixed reactions. Jon Rahm welcomed the recognition but questioned the fairness of limiting points to ten players. Bryson DeChambeau expressed frustration, noting the league made format adjustments yet still faces restrictions. LIV officials criticized the rule, arguing that finishing 11th is treated the same as finishing last, creating an “all-or-nothing” environment unique in modern rankings history.

Beyond governance, Kim’s win carried cultural weight. Once known for a party-driven lifestyle, he emphasized sobriety, family, and personal growth. He celebrated quietly with his wife and daughter, calling it the most meaningful moment of his life. The emotional shift resonated widely, reframing him from unrealized talent to symbol of resilience.

Commercially, the Adelaide event set attendance records and reinforced LIV’s strength in Australia. Kim became an instant crowd favorite, particularly after a dramatic birdie at the “Watering Hole” sparked a surge of energy.

While the victory does not guarantee major entry, it fundamentally altered Kim’s trajectory. He moved from statistical irrelevance outside the Top 800 to a competitive factor within the global system. His stated goal is simple: continue improving, win more trophies, and use golf as a platform to inspire others.

In early 2026, Anthony Kim’s comeback stands as both a personal resurrection and a catalyst in golf’s evolving competitive structure.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

The Puttalyze Concept transforms short putting from guesswork into measurable physics. Most missed putts are not technical errors but miscalculations of gravity and time. Break is not determined by slope alone. It follows a simple physical law:

Break = Slope × Time

Slope provides the force. Time allows gravity to influence the ball. The longer the ball rolls, the more gravity can move it off line. Understanding and controlling time is therefore the key to precision.

Time as the Decisive Variable

Two forces dominate every putt: gravity and rolling friction. Gravity pulls the ball downhill, while friction slows it down. The balance between these forces defines how long the ball remains in motion — and therefore how much it breaks.

Softer putts break more because they roll longer. Faster greens increase break because reduced friction extends roll time. Longer putts break more due to greater duration. Downhill putts break more because gravity maintains velocity and extends exposure time. Every read must account for this time factor.

Target Speed – 3 Rotations Per Second

Puttalyze standardizes a target speed of 3 rps at the hole. At this speed, the ball uses the full effective capture width of approximately 3.5 inches. It resists early slope influence yet avoids excessive lip-outs. Too slow increases break and causes low-side misses. Too fast reduces effective hole size and increases bounce-outs. Speed consistency is non-negotiable.

High-Side Entry – The 2/3 Principle

The hole must be divided mentally into three horizontal sections. Only the upper two-thirds provide effective entry. A ball entering through the lower third is already moving away from the center due to slope. Therefore, the visual center is not the true target. On breaking putts, the effective entry point is always above center. High-side entry is mathematically superior.

Green Speed and Stimp

Green speed modifies time within the equation. Faster greens reduce friction, extend roll time, and increase break. Slower greens shorten roll time and reduce break. Stimp must therefore be integrated into every calculation. Ignoring green speed invalidates the read.

The Calculation Process

Step one is analysis: measure slope percentage, identify the fall line, determine green speed, and estimate distance.
Step two is calculation: apply the physics of time and slope interaction.
Step three is entry adjustment: aim for the upper two-thirds of the hole.
Step four is execution: deliver 3 rps at the hole. Without correct speed, the aim point collapses.

Slope and Fall Line

Slope acts as a multiplier. Steeper slopes require wider aim points due to increased gravitational pull. Underestimating slope guarantees low-side misses. The fall line defines gravity’s direction. Without identifying it, the calculation is incomplete.

Puttalyze removes emotion from putting and replaces it with structure. Control time. Respect slope. Enter high.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

This Podcast provides a structured research foundation for a biographical podcast on legendary golf instructor John Jacobs. It calls for a comprehensive exploration of his journey from tour professional to one of the most influential coaches in golf history. Central to the narrative is his groundbreaking “Practical Golf” philosophy, which shifted instruction away from rigid swing models and toward understanding ball flight and impact.

Jacobs revolutionized coaching with a diagnostic, impact-first approach that contrasted sharply with traditional technique-driven schools. His core belief — “The Ball Never Lies” — emphasized analyzing the ball’s flight to identify cause-and-effect relationships in the swing. Rather than focusing on how a swing looked, he prioritized what the ball actually did.

His methodology laid the foundation for modern instruction. The outline highlights clear parallels between his principles and today’s launch monitor data as well as contemporary biomechanics. Concepts such as impact variables, ball-flight laws, and feedback-driven correction were embedded in his teaching decades before technology could measure them precisely. For this reason, many modern elite coaches are considered indirect descendants of his philosophy.

The framework also emphasizes Jacobs’ institutional legacy, including the founding of his international golf schools and his major influence within the European PGA. These contributions helped standardize coaching education and spread his analytical approach worldwide.

The Podcast clarifies that it is a research structure rather than a full biography. It instructs researchers to investigate areas such as notable players he coached, the detailed content and long-term influence of his book Practical Golf, and his personal characteristics as a mentor and leader. However, those specifics are not contained in the source itself.

Key principles identified as the backbone of his philosophy include:

• The Ball Never Lies – ball flight reveals swing truth
• Cause and Effect – every shot result has a measurable reason
• Ball-Flight Laws – trajectory as the primary diagnostic tool
• Impact-First Thinking – understanding collision before motion
• Outcome Over Aesthetics – function over visual style

Jacobs’ interpretation of these ideas directly anticipates modern launch monitor analysis. Today’s technology measures face angle, path, speed, and spin; Jacobs used observation and logic to reach the same conclusions. His approach transformed coaching from art toward science, establishing him as a pioneer of modern performance analysis.

Ultimately, this outline serves as a roadmap for telling the story of a coach whose ideas still shape how the game is taught — blending factual history, technical insight, and expert discussion to capture his lasting impact on golf.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

This body of research examines how elite golfers generate clubhead speed through the coordinated use of ground reaction forces (GRF) and torque. Using force plates, biomechanical models track weight transfer, center of pressure (COP), and the interaction between the feet and the ground. A key concept is the X-factor—the rotational separation between hips and shoulders—which stores elastic energy and contributes to power. Compared to amateurs, elite players convert lateral motion into rotation more efficiently by stabilizing the lead leg and applying braking forces. Neuromotor studies further suggest that simplified trunk control improves coordination and consistency.

The Three Components of Power

Elite golfers generate power by applying GRF in three dimensions, executed in a precise sequence:

• Horizontal Force (Mediolateral): Drives the lateral pressure shift toward the lead foot early in the downswing, creating a stable base for rotation.

• Rotational Force / Torque (Anteroposterior): Produced by a force couple—trail foot pushing forward and lead foot pushing backward. This shearing action is the most efficient way to create rotational speed due to larger lever arms.

• Vertical Force: Generated by “posting up” on the lead leg. The resulting upward reaction force extends the lead side and accelerates the club through impact. Elite long hitters can exceed 200% of body weight in vertical force.

Kinetic Sequence

Efficiency depends on timing, not just force magnitude:

1. Horizontal force peaks first during transition.
2. Torque peaks next as the pelvis and torso rotate (around lead arm parallel).
3. Vertical force peaks last, just before impact.

The Braking Effect

Elite players decelerate the lower body to transfer energy up the kinetic chain. Lead-leg braking is approximately 40% stronger than the trail leg, and even higher in long-drive athletes. This converts linear momentum into rotational speed. Amateurs often lose power by sliding instead of stabilizing.

Elite vs. Amateur Differences

Professionals apply forces more simultaneously, load the trail leg more effectively in the backswing, and maintain optimal separation between center of mass (COM) and COP to maximize rotational leverage.

Summary of the Elite Power Pattern

1. Load pressure into the trail foot in the backswing.
2. Shift pressure horizontally to the lead foot in transition.
3. Apply a simultaneous shearing action to create torque.
4. Push vertically with the lead leg to brake the body and release the club.

• ⁠📺 The Explainer⁠

• www.Golf247.eu⁠

Ground Reaction Force (GRF) is presented as the true engine of the golf swing, driving both speed and stability. Rather than starting with rotation, elite swings rely on how effectively the golfer interacts with the ground to convert linear pressure into angular velocity. GRF is described as the “conversation between the body and the ground,” governing sequence, timing, and control throughout the swing.

Efficient swings follow a strict coaching hierarchy: Sequence → Timing → Magnitude. The correct force sequence is lateral, then rotational, then vertical. Golfers first shift pressure toward the lead side, then create torque, and finally “post up” vertically. Timing is critical: force peaks must occur before impact, while the club is still approaching delivery. Late force application is ineffective, comparable to accelerating after passing a corner. While peak force matters, elite players distinguish themselves through impulse—the ability to apply meaningful force over time without losing structure.

A central concept is the lead-side anchor, which functions as both an accelerator and a braking system. By stabilizing the body through lateral, rotational, and vertical forces just before impact, the lead side creates an “anchor moment” that allows the club to release freely. Without this anchor, the swing becomes chaotic, forcing compensations such as stalling, flipping, or early extension.

GRF also generates torque through coordinated, opposing forces from both feet, often explained using the “bottle cap” model. Relying on only one mechanism—typically a heel-to-toe push—produces raw speed but lacks stability. Balanced contribution from both feet is required to stay centered and control the strike.

Common faults like early extension are framed not as random errors, but as natural consequences of poor force sequencing. Trail-side dominance, late vertical force peaks, or failure to brace against the club’s pull push the pelvis toward the ball and force the body to stand up. Consistent ball striking improves when the lead side “wins” the battle by providing a stable braking-and-posting platform through impact.

Ultimately, consistent power comes from completing major ground-force events early, stacking lateral, rotational, and vertical forces into a small pre-impact window, and training impulse rather than short, violent force spikes. When the lower body prepares the release instead of reacting to it, the swing gains speed, stability, and repeatability.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu