Golf club grooves play a decisive role in how a ball behaves at impact, during flight, and after landing. Their primary purpose is to manage debris and moisture while creating the friction required to generate backspin. Without grooves, the ball would slide up the clubface—especially in wet or grassy conditions—leading to inconsistent launch, reduced spin, and unpredictable distance control.

At impact, grooves act as displacement channels. They move water, grass, and dirt away from the contact zone so the metal face can grip the ball cleanly. This clean contact increases friction, which in turn produces backspin. Backspin generates aerodynamic lift, influences trajectory height, and determines how steeply the ball descends and how quickly it stops after landing. Together, debris management and friction create consistency, allowing players to predict ball flight and rollout.

Square Grooves are designed for maximum spin and control. Their flat bottoms and sharp edges create the highest friction levels, allowing the clubface to “grab” the ball cover aggressively. Shots launched with square grooves fly higher, descend at steeper angles, and land softly with minimal rollout. This makes them ideal for precision approach shots, though the added spin also increases drag and can slightly reduce overall distance.

U-Grooves offer a balanced performance. Their deeper, wider channels are especially effective at clearing grass and moisture, helping maintain spin from the rough. They produce moderate backspin and mid-range landing angles, combining reasonable stopping power with usable distance. This versatility makes them effective across a wide range of lies and shot types.

V-Grooves sit at the opposite end of the spectrum. With angled sides and narrower profiles, they generate the lowest spin rates. The reduced friction results in flatter trajectories and shallower landing angles. After impact, the ball tends to roll out more, maximizing distance but reducing stopping power on approach shots.

In summary, groove geometry directly shapes ball flight physics. Square grooves deliver the highest spin and steepest landings for maximum control. U-grooves balance spin, distance, and consistency, particularly in imperfect lies. V-grooves favor lower spin, flatter flights, and increased rollout for distance. Much like tire treads on a wet road, grooves ensure grip by channeling away interference—turning impact conditions into predictable, controllable outcomes.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

This report outlines the professional golf landscape during the second week of January 2026, a period shaped by strategic decisions rather than active competition. With major tours such as the PGA Tour and LPGA still in their off-season, attention shifted toward governance, structure, and future alignment across global golf.

A central focus was the LIV Golf Promotions event, which became the key competitive element of the week. Its importance was not tied to prize money, but to its role in addressing the ongoing debate with the Official World Golf Ranking (OWGR). Overall, professional golf appears to be moving away from division and toward structural normalization.

LIV Golf has introduced several adjustments for the 2026 season to better align with traditional ranking standards. The most significant change is the move from a 54-hole format to 72-hole tournaments, directly addressing long-standing concerns about competitive legitimacy.

In addition, LIV expanded its field size from 54 to 57 players. While a modest increase, it signals progress toward broader participation standards expected by ranking bodies.

Most importantly, LIV introduced three merit-based wild-card spots, awarded through performance in the Promotions event. This establishes a clear qualification pathway and counters criticism that LIV operates as a closed system.

The OWGR remains the primary gateway to major championships and global recognition. Discussions between LIV Golf and the OWGR continued throughout the week, while the ranking body itself has begun refining how points are allocated across tours. These adjustments indicate an effort to standardize ranking logic worldwide.

The overall tone within professional golf is gradually softening. Cooperation between the PGA Tour and DP World Tour is moving from conceptual frameworks toward practical planning for the 2026 season.

Public sentiment has also shifted. Influential players have expressed openness to reintegration, suggesting future mobility between tours. At the same time, LIV’s partnership with the Asian Tour continues to strengthen, with the International Series serving as a structured pathway for emerging players.

Professional golf in early 2026 is defined by transition rather than confrontation. LIV Golf is adapting its structure to connect with established systems, while traditional tours are exploring coexistence. The sport is steadily moving from fragmentation toward a more unified and structured global model.

LIV Golf Structural ChangesOWGR and Global AlignmentReintegration and CooperationConclusion

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

In this podcast excerpt, Henrik Jentsch analyzes the evolution of driving distance on the PGA Tour and questions its true impact on scoring and dominance. While modern professionals hit the ball farther than ever before, distance alone has not become a guarantee for success. By contrasting elite power hitters such as Rory McIlroy with more balanced, consistency-driven players like Scottie Scheffler, the core message becomes clear: precision, decision-making, and strategy remain the foundations of elite performance.

Since the mid-1990s, average driving distance on the PGA Tour has risen dramatically—from roughly 260 meters (285 yards) to just under 303 meters (331 yards) today. The first major jump came with the introduction of titanium drivers and multi-layer golf balls, which replaced wooden heads and older ball constructions. However, the most recent gains, particularly since around 2015, are not tied to a single innovation. Instead, they result from a synergy of several developments.

Modern equipment is now highly optimized, with refined shaft profiles, advanced head geometry, and improved ball aerodynamics. At the same time, launch monitors and AI-based analysis tools provide precise, individualized feedback, allowing players to fine-tune their swings with measurable accuracy. Sports science and biomechanics have also transformed coaching. Rather than simply encouraging players to swing harder, modern training helps athletes understand their bodies and identify their most efficient movement patterns.

Despite these gains, the comparison between McIlroy and Scheffler underlines an important truth. McIlroy is one of the longest hitters on Tour and succeeds because he combines power with precision and a strong short game. Scheffler, on the other hand, ranks well below the Tour’s longest drivers yet has become the most dominant and consistent player due to elite ball-striking, control, and scoring efficiency. Distance, therefore, is only one piece of a much larger performance puzzle.

The discussion also extends to course design. Simply lengthening golf courses tends to favor long hitters even more, widening the gap between player types. Smarter architecture—featuring strategic landing zones, narrower fairways, and meaningful risk-reward decisions—places a premium on accuracy and intelligence rather than raw power.

Ultimately, the modern distance boom is best understood not as a power race, but as the result of integrated technology, data, and biomechanics. The future of competitive balance in golf lies not in swinging faster, but in playing smarter.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golg247.eu

Consistent and powerful ball striking depends primarily on precise clubface control. This control is largely determined by the lead hand and wrist, as the back of the left hand directly mirrors the orientation of the clubface. The key difference between professionals and amateurs is not strength, but the timing and sequence of three specific wrist movements.

The Professional SequenceElite players execute these movements in a clear and deliberate order:

• Flexion: During the transition from the backswing to the downswing, the left wrist is flexed to establish the correct clubface angle early.

• Ulnar Deviation (Unhinging): This is followed by a controlled downward hinging of the wrist, which begins to release stored energy.

• Supination: Only very late does the wrist rotate, squaring the clubface precisely at impact.

This sequence—flexion, unhinging, supination—ensures efficient energy transfer and delivers the clubface square to the ball.

The Typical Amateur SequenceMany amateurs reverse this order:

• Casting: The wrist hinge is released too early.

• Early Opening: The clubface opens during the downswing.

• Late Correction: Attempts to square the face occur too late to be effective.

The result is an open clubface, glancing contact, and shots that drift to the right.

Core PrincipleThe back of the left hand acts as the “navigation system” for the clubface. Every movement of the hand directly changes the clubface orientation. Mastering the correct sequence automatically leads to better clubface control.

AnalogyLike snapping a whip or cracking a towel, the “snap” only occurs when tension is maintained until the final moment and then released with precision. Releasing too early destroys both energy and direction.

Modern motion analysis tools make this sequence measurable and allow it to be trained with precision.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

Understanding Rule 19.3b – When a Bogey is a Victory

Golf is a game of decisions, and sometimes the smartest one is knowing when not to play the hero shot.

Imagine this: you've just hit a firm putt from the green, but the ball runs past the hole, catches the slope, and rolls off into a deep greenside bunker. Welcome to Pinehurst No. 2 – or any course with slick, crowned greens.

Now what?

Most golfers instinctively reach for the sand wedge and prepare for a high-tension bunker shot. But there’s a better way — and it’s perfectly legal.

Rule 19.3b of the Rules of Golf allows you to declare the ball unplayable and return to your previous spot — in this case, back on the putting green — with a one-stroke penalty.

This rarely used option offers two massive advantages:

1. Risk Mitigation

Bunker shots from just off the green are notoriously difficult. You often have a steep lip, little green to work with, and soft sand that punishes even slight errors.

• Hit it fat? You’re still in the bunker.
• Hit it thin? The ball sails over the green.
• Try to be perfect? You might compound the error.

By invoking Rule 19.3b, you eliminate these high-risk variables completely. You remove the chance of turning a three-putt into a triple bogey.

2. Restoration of Control

Going back to your original spot on the green lets you reset the situation. Yes, you're now putting for bogey — but you’re doing it from a familiar position with no bunkers, no slopes, no drama.

This isn’t giving up — it's gaining control. And in golf, control is everything.

Think of it like paying a small insurance fee to avoid the risk of disaster. You trade one stroke to avoid the chaos that often follows a high-tension recovery shot. It’s a decision rooted in course management, self-awareness, and emotional intelligence.

As one coach put it:

“It’s like a video game undo button. You rewind to just before the mistake — but you pay a small price to do it.”

How It Works – Quick Summary of Rule 19.3b

• Ball rolls off the green into a bunker
• Your previous stroke was from the putting green
• You declare the ball unplayable
• You place the ball back at your original putting spot
• You add one penalty stroke

You’re now putting again, with full control — and likely walking away with bogey, not double or worse.

In the End...

Strategic players aren’t always the ones who take the boldest shots — they’re the ones who know when not to. Rule 19.3b gives you the power to take back control, avoid disaster, and protect your scorecard from spiraling out of control.

Because sometimes, the smartest bogey is the one you choose.

• 🎧 Listen now

• www.Golf247.eu

Modern golf club fitting often relies on a convenient shortcut: testing a single club—typically a 7-iron—and extrapolating its results to an entire iron set. From a scientific and performance perspective, this approach is fundamentally flawed.

Iron sets are not collections of identical tools. Each club is engineered for a distinct functional role. Long irons are designed to maximize launch and carry with lower lofts and longer shafts. Mid-irons balance distance and control. Wedges prioritize spin, trajectory control, and precision. Because design elements such as loft, shaft length, center of mass, face construction, sole geometry, and offset change progressively through the set, a 4-iron is structurally and functionally different from a pitching wedge. Testing one club cannot verify whether critical performance elements are missing or compromised elsewhere in the set.

Biomechanics further invalidate single-club fitting. A golfer’s motion adapts naturally to different clubs. A 7-iron swing is not a 4-iron swing. Ball position shifts, swing length and tempo change, and key impact variables—angle of attack, dynamic loft, spin rate, and launch window—vary throughout the bag. Expecting one data point to represent these changing interactions ignores basic physics and human movement patterns.

The most significant consequence is poor distance gapping. When only one iron is tested, gaps across the set are assumed rather than verified. Golfers may never realize that their long irons launch too low, spin too little, or fall out of the air prematurely, or that short irons overlap in distance. These issues often remain hidden until real-world play exposes them.

Single-club fitting persists not because it is optimal, but because it is efficient, scalable, and easy to explain. Visual uniformity in modern iron sets reinforces the illusion that all clubs behave similarly, masking critical internal differences. Manufacturers and fitters are aware that this approach is a compromise rather than best practice, yet it remains the standard because consumers rarely challenge it.

True iron optimization requires evaluating the set as a complete system. Precision is not achieved by estimation. It is achieved by verifying how every club performs and how all clubs work together.

The future of fitting will not change because technology improves.
It will change when golfers stop accepting shortcuts—and start demanding proof.

• 📺 The Explaine

• www.Golf247.eu

This Podcast describes how controlling the nervous system is central to consistent performance in precision sports like golf. High arousal—caused by fear, anger, excitement, or future-focused thinking—disrupts coordination, tempo, and concentration. The key to peak performance lies in balancing the two branches of the autonomic nervous system: the sympathetic (arousal) and the parasympathetic (relaxation).

The sympathetic system acts as the body’s accelerator. When activated, it increases heart rate, blood pressure, muscle tension, and breathing speed. Mentally, it leads to sensory overload: the brain processes too much information at once, making it difficult to focus on a single task. In golf, this results in rushed swings, loss of fine motor control, blurred vision, and racing thoughts. Common triggers include worrying about scores, reacting to mistakes, fear of judgment, and even positive excitement after good shots.

The parasympathetic system is the counterbalance. It slows the body down, relaxes muscles, restores normal breathing, and quiets the mind. This state enables selective attention—blocking out distractions like hazards or leaderboards—and supports a calm, “one-shot-at-a-time” focus. Most players perform best in this controlled, relaxed state, although a small group of naturally under-aroused athletes may need mild stimulation.

Breathing is the main switch between these systems. Fast, shallow breathing activates arousal, while deep diaphragmatic breathing—especially with an exhale twice as long as the inhale—interrupts the stress chain and restores calm. Because physiological reactions form a chain, changing breathing alone can stabilize the entire system.

The Podcast identifies four primary causes of arousal:

1. Future thinking (scores, results, outcomes)

2. Anger from blocked goals or mistakes

3. Fear of failure or judgment

4. Excitement, which creates the same physiological response as fear

All four press the “gas pedal” of the nervous system, increasing speed but reducing control.

To manage arousal, nine practical strategies are outlined: deep breathing, slowing physical movement, mindfulness, visualization, consistent routines, stretching, upright posture, biofeedback awareness, and confidence built through preparation. Together, these habits replace “hit and hope” reactions with calm, intentional execution. Peak performance emerges not from intensity, but from composure under pressure.

• 📺 The Explainer

• www.Golf247.eu

In this instructional guide, Henrik Jentsch explains that successful golf shots depend far more on mental visualization than on focusing on a specific spot on the ball. Instead of fixating on mechanics or ball contact, golfers should mentally rehearse the entire shot before swinging.

Effective visualization means creating a complete mental “movie” of the shot: the starting line, trajectory, height, curvature (draw, fade, or straight), and landing point. This process reduces uncertainty and physical tension, replacing rushed or forced swings with a clear objective. Visualization also engages multiple senses—seeing the flight, hearing the sound of impact, feeling the club move through the ball, and sensing the contact on the clubface.

Visualization also serves as feedback from the body. If a player intends to hit a draw but can only visualize a fade, this indicates what movement feels most natural at that moment. Rather than forcing the original plan, performance improves when the golfer adjusts strategy to match the visualized shot. On the course, the priority is to work with what feels available that day; technical changes can be practiced later on the range.

Once the visual picture is clear, execution becomes reactive rather than mechanical. The golfer stops consciously manipulating the swing and instead reacts to the mental image. This alignment between mind and body leads to better contact, improved decision-making, and more consistent results.

For players who prefer a visual reference at address, visualization can guide where to focus. To hit a draw, one might visualize the divot moving slightly to the right and focus on the inside of the ball. For a fade, the image shifts to the outside of the ball with the divot moving left. The key is that the focus supports the intended picture, not replaces it.

Mental visualization works like entering a destination into a GPS before driving. Without a route, decisions are hesitant and erratic. With a clear route, movement becomes smooth and confident. Likewise, a golfer should never swing until the picture is clear. When the mind knows exactly what it wants to see, the body can simply respond.

• www.Golf247.eu