『Let's think : By Dr.King, Swami Satyapriya』のカバーアート

Let's think : By Dr.King, Swami Satyapriya

Let's think : By Dr.King, Swami Satyapriya

著者： Dr.King Swami Satyapriya
無料で聴く

Explore science, philosophy, and spirituality for a deeper life. Get motivational insights and healthy thoughts for purposeful, better living.(C) Dr. King スピリチュアリティ ヒンズー教 哲学 社会科学 衛生・健康的な生活
エピソード
  • [English] The Price of Compromising Values: The Story of a Modern Guru's Crisis.

    [English] The Price of Compromising Values: The Story of a Modern Guru's Crisis.
    2026/10/16
    [Preview books] [Borrow books] [Pause] Today, we will take an in-depth look at the twenty-five-year journey of an Indian yoga guru who has achieved global recognition.We are examining this case today not out of disrespect for him, and certainly not with the intention of personally vilifying him. Rather, we are looking at it as impartial observers of universal human phenomena.This guru's life journey offers a clear example of how an enormous foundation built on public trust gradually began to crack when it moved away from its fundamental integrity. To support our analysis, let us first understand the vocabulary that ancient Indian traditions used to explain struggles of this kind, in real life.They used the word 'Satya' to describe the highest form of reality. They did not define truth as merely a simple, fixed fact. They described it as a living alignment between the thoughts in your mind, the words you speak, and the actions you perform. All three must remain committed to the supreme principle of collective welfare.In contrast, they used the word 'Asatya' to describe the fragmentation that occurs when your words or actions move away from the reality of your own mind.If we look back twenty-five years, most people in India and many parts of the world regarded this guru as a leader who had brought a wave of revolutionary change.He accomplished something extraordinary: he brought the ancient practice of yoga out of the secluded ashrams where it had remained hidden and took it directly into the homes of ordinary people. His intentions initially appeared pure. And no one could deny his influence on society.But to a teacher trained in classical and practical precision, the first warning signs in this story were visible quite early.These signs began to emerge when the guru started presenting a specific routine of physical exercises as the complete system of Patanjali's classical yoga.He did not stop there. He began confidently claiming that practices such as Kapalabhati could cure virtually any disease in the world.Yet these extraordinary claims had neither scientific evidence nor the support of authoritative classical texts.If you read the traditional source texts on these subjects, you will find that the great teachers of the tradition never described such intense breathing techniques as universal remedies for every ailment. On the contrary, they issued strict warnings about them.They explained that these techniques are powerful practices designed for specific purposes and must be performed with great care under direct, individual guidance.Forcing a body without proper training, to undergo such an intense and unnatural breathing practice can cause permanent physical damage. This is a medical fact.Nevertheless, when medical concerns and reports of adverse incidents first came to the forefront, the response from his organization was neither self-examination nor scientific humility. Instead, the concerns were immediately dismissed as part of a systematic conspiracy orchestrated by proponents of Western medicine or jealous commercial competitors.Because the public deeply believed that he was a holy saint, people overlooked this fundamental inconsistency. The desire to preserve popularity and expand a commercial empire, had quietly, almost imperceptibly, pushed the rigorous precision demanded by 'Satya' into the background.This initial departure from the right path set the stage for a psychological setback that reached its dramatic climax during the COVID-19 crisis.During that terrible period of the global coronavirus pandemic, when humanity was gripped by fear, this Baba's organisation announced to the world that it had found a guaranteed and permanent solution to the virus.To support this sweeping claim, his team presented published scientific data from studies known as molecular docking studies.These docking studies were entirely legitimate. They used mathematical models to show how active chemical compounds found in certain traditional herbs could theoretically bind to a viral protein in a computer-based laboratory environment.But this is precisely where we must apply the fundamental lessons we discussed in earlier episodes: there is an enormous difference between an isolated piece of data and the complete integration of truth.Those docking studies were simply, data. They may have represented genuine numerical results generated on a computer screen. But presenting a computer-based simulation that had not been clinically proven as an effective treatment for COVID-19 to a frightened global population was a grave betrayal of truth.Before any particular laboratory finding can be translated into actual human use, standardized, transparent clinical procedures subject to peer review are essential.Yet the transparency that was indispensable to this process was missing. Studies were conducted on people without obtaining proper consent. Mandatory prior approvals from regulatory authorities were ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1分未満
  • [English] The Psychology of dishonesty: Why Do We Avoid Speaking the Truth?

    [English] The Psychology of dishonesty: Why Do We Avoid Speaking the Truth?
    2026/10/09
    [Preview books] [Borrow books] [Pause] Today, we will discuss an uncomfortable, deeply personal, and psychological issue. The issue is - why do we often hesitate to speak the truth? Why are we more comfortable speaking a lie than a simple straightforward truth?When we look at the world around us, we see people around us distorting the reality. We think that they do it with malicious intentions. We often tend to divide the world into good people and bad people. But human psychology is far more complex, and far more fragile than that. Not speaking the truth is not necessarily a sign of evil intentions. Instead, it is almost always a sign of deep internal weakness. To understand this human weakness, ancient Indian philosophers created a beautiful and clear framework. They identified the concept of inherent truth. They called it Satya. Satya is an unbroken alignment between what you think, what you say, and what you do. Conversely, they labeled the fragmentation of that alignment, its distortions, its omissions, the half-truths—as Asatya.If Satya is a perfectly built house where the foundation, the walls, and the roof all lining up, then Asatya is like a crack in that structure. But why do we create a crack in it?Let us look at five main psychological reasons that makes people create such cracks. Let us also closely look at the invisible and compounding decay that those cracks leave behind.The first, and the most obvious motivation is bad intention. This occurs when an individual deliberately misrepresents reality. He may do it to manipulate an outcome for his personal benefit, at the cost of others. This is the way a fraudster or a smart sales person, or a manipulative leader operates.Think of a salesperson who knowingly sells a defective and accident prone vehicle to a family. He assures them that the vehicle has passed all safety checks. While he does that, his mind is very well aware of some defect in the vehicle, but his speech fabricates a false narrative to accomplish a profitable deed. There is a contradiction between what he thinks, what he says and what he does. The three are not aligned. He knowingly utters an Asatya, though he cloaks it in such a way that it sounds like Satya. The result can be dangerous.The second reason is much more common. It is far more subtle, and deeply tragic. It is the poor self-esteem of a person who indulges in speaking Asatya. When an individual feels inherently inadequate, when he firmly believes that his real self is not valuable enough to be loved or accepted, he begins to construct an elaborate, false reality.Such people look into the mirror and wish their shortcomings are invisible. They try to cover them up by building a mask. They exaggerate their career achievements, they fabricate elite credentials, or they hide their deep financial vulnerabilities. They put up a loud shield of bravado.They avoid the real truth because that truth feels terrifyingly naked. They operate under the firm belief that if the world sees them exactly as they are, they will be instantly rejected.That leads to the third driving force to speak Asatya. That is the desperate urge to remain popular. We see this absolute pitfall, all over in our modern day hypersensitive digital culture.Influencers, political leaders, and even educators often fall prey to this. As a result they misrepresent hard realities. They are terrified of offending their audience, or facing public backlash.They focus on what the crowd wants to hear, and like a polished mirror, they reflect that exact delusion back to them. They choose popularity over clarity; they prioritize temporary social validation over timeless honesty.But a reality that is misrepresented, bent, and compromised just to please the ears of the masses, loses its integrity. It is no longer based on three way alignment. It has been sacrificed at the altar of public approval.The fourth cause that motivates one to speak Asatya is excessive greed. When the hunger for material wealth, rapid corporate expansion, or personal power, overrides all ethical boundaries, an honest lifestyle is always the first to get sacrificed.When that happens, an individual looks at a crisis or a vulnerable group of people, he takes that not as a sacred opportunity to serve, but as a way to exploit.Think of a pharmaceutical company that discovers a minor side-effect in a highly profitable drug. Instead of pausing production to protect lives, they rush the product to the global market, make sensationalist marketing claims, and actively weaponize public fear.Why do they do that?Because their vision is entirely blinded by the immediate, craving for acquisition of wealth.The fifth and final reason is a profound ignorance about long-term consequences of being dishonest. Human beings are evolutionarily hardwired to prioritize immediate short-term gratification over distant, invisible repercussions.Telling a small lie takes exactly three seconds. It instantly ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1分未満
  • [English] Why is telling the facts not the same as speaking the truth?

    [English] Why is telling the facts not the same as speaking the truth?
    2026/10/02
    [Preview books] [Borrow books] [Pause] You might have overlooked this subtle distinction. But failing to recognize it can lead to long-term consequences. The noise of the modern information age has blurred this difference, and unknowingly we fall prey to misinformation.In our daily lives, we often focus on facts. We tend to assume that if a statement correlates with measurable, empirical data, it must be true. However, this is not always the case. Facts and truth have significant differences. One is cold data, while the other is a living entity with far-reaching consequences. Let me give you an example. Imagine a brilliant scientist discovers a specific chemical compound that successfully inhibits a virus in a controlled petri dish. That is a fact verified by scientific methodology.But now imagine the same scientist goes on national television to tell a panicked public that this compound is an instant cure for a complex disease confronting humanity. His discovery may have great potential, but he has yet to confirm it through wide-scale empirical studies.This scientist is using a fact to support a massive lie. He is driven by a hidden desire for personal fame or corporate wealth. His spoken word grossly exaggerates reality; his deed completely bypasses public safety concerns.We often face this terrifying reality on our social media feeds every day. A person can recite absolute unassailable facts and still be guilty of profound malicious dishonesty.So, it is not sufficient to just go by the facts. Cold facts need to be backed with good intention and delivered with utter responsibility. That is when a cold fact becomes a living truth or Satya as ancient Indian philosophers called it.We find the most rigorous definition of Satya in Vyasa's commentary on Patanjali's Yoga Sutras. Vyasa did not view Satya as a passive fact. He defined Satya through a strict, unyielding law of three-way consistency.Let us listen closely to the core understanding of his view on Satya as proclaimed through this Sanskrit verse:"yathārthe vāṅ-manase; yathā dṛṣṭaṁ yathā'numitaṁ yathā śrutaṁ tathā vāṅ-manase."— Yoga Sutra – Saadhana Paada, Sutra 30 – Vyasa's commentary.Translated simply, this means that "what you say should correspond exactly to what your mind thinks; the reality as it was directly seen, or logically inferred, or heard from a reliable source." That sounds like a standard for consistency, doesn't it?But Vyasa does not stop at mere mechanical consistency.He immediately adds a second ethical filter: "speech must be uttered not to deceive but for the absolute welfare of all living beings."Vyasa moves on to state that "if speech causes unnecessary harm, cruelty, or suffering to creatures, even if it is 100% factually accurate, it is not considered as Satya.It is, in reality, a sinful act." This is a highly sophisticated form of speech called Asatya, which is the Sanskrit word for untruth or falsehood.Asatya leads to deep spiritual degradation.Satya is a living, breathing, structural concept.It demands an absolute, beautiful harmony between three distinct pillars of your existence: your underlying thought, your spoken word, and your physical deed.If any one of these pillars bends, the structure of truth collapses.A well-known narrative in the ancient Indian epic Mahabharata captures this distinction beautifully.Dronacharya was the indomitable commander of the opposing army in the Mahabharata.He was slaughtering the forces of the heroes and was completely unstoppable.The only way to defeat him was to break his spirit, and the only way to do that was to make him believe that his beloved son, Ashwatthama, had been killed in battle.To achieve this, one of the heroes on the defending side slayed a massive war elephant named Ashwatthama.Then they approached the commander with the news.But Dronacharya, knowing the deceptive nature of war, refused to believe anyone except Yudhishtira,—a king renowned across the cosmos for his absolute, unblemished commitment to truth.Dronacharya asked him directly:"Is my son Ashwatthama dead?"Yudhishthira replied with literal, factual words:"Ashwatthama is dead."And then, in a soft whisper, he added:"…the elephant."Factually—Yudhishthira did not speak a single falsehood.An animal named Ashwatthama was indeed dead.The statement correlated perfectly with an event on the battlefield.But according to the definition of Satya, Yudhishtira committed a profound, monumental lie.Why?Because his internal alignment was broken.His thought was driven by a desire to deceive the commander; his word was structured to mislead him; and his deed resulted in an absolute collapse of trust.It caused a father to drop his weapons and meet his violent demise.The three-way consistency was shattered.The fact was accurate, but the intention was not.So, it was not Satya; it was Asatya.It is no coincidence that the epic records that at that exact moment, Yudhishtira's ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1分未満
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません