Audible会員プラン登録で、20万以上の対象タイトルが聴き放題。
-
In Search of Memory
- The Emergence of a New Science of Mind
- ナレーター: James Anderson Foster
- 再生時間: 14 時間 41 分
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Audible会員プラン 無料体験
あらすじ・解説
Memory binds our mental life together. We are who we are in large part because of what we learn and remember. But how does the brain create memories?
Nobel Prize winner Eric R. Kandel intertwines the intellectual history of the powerful new science of the mind - a combination of cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and molecular biology - with his own personal quest to understand memory.
A deft mixture of memoir and history, modern biology and behavior, In Search of Memory brings listeners from Kandel's childhood in Nazi-occupied Vienna to the forefront of one of the great scientific endeavors of the 20th century: the search for the biological basis of memory.
In Search of Memoryに寄せられたリスナーの声
カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。
-
総合評価
-
ナレーション
-
ストーリー
- jhklcrwijo
- 2020/10/16
Suddenly got political
I enjoyed most of the part of this book. It was easy to understand for this difficult topic, and autobiography parts gave me understanding of how this man had lived.
However, the part where he suddenly began talking about the Austrian involvement in Nazis was really irrelevant. I was really surprised when he said he had made a lecture concerning it after he received the Nobel prize. It must have been a real surprise for the audience, who had anticipated a great scientific lecture.
People trust scientists because they think they know facts. However, political matters are not about facts. Surely, you have to distinguish between truths and lies, but mostly, they are about opinions, emotions, decisions, and interests. There are no “absolutely right” or “absolutely wrong”.
I really disappointed that he irrelevantly inserted his political standpoint in the near-final part of this book. I hope naive readers do not confuse with these political opinions and scientific facts. These are quite different problems and should be treated in different contexts.
Most scientists know that they are experts only in their fields. I’m not sure he did.
問題が発生しました。数分後にもう一度お試しください。
ありがとうございました。
あなたはこのレビューを報告しました!