• Attorney General v Maharaj [2023] UKPC 36, T&T

  • 2023/10/19
  • 再生時間: 21 分
  • ポッドキャスト

Attorney General v Maharaj [2023] UKPC 36, T&T

  • サマリー

  • This week, it’s a momentous case of constitutional law from Trinidad & Tobago, in a judgment from Sir Rabinder Singh, as we consider the constitutionality of sedition laws. Is sedition to ovague an offence to be legally certain? Can a guarantee of a ‘democratic’ State in the constitution be enough to strike a law down? Does Australian case law have any relevance? Listen to find out!

    Link to Case: [2023] UKPC 36, T&T

    Legal Style Blog homepage

    Twitter: @legalstyleblog

    E-mail: editor@legalstyle.co.uk

    Legal Style Blog Guide to Uniform Privy Council Citations

    続きを読む 一部表示
activate_samplebutton_t1

あらすじ・解説

This week, it’s a momentous case of constitutional law from Trinidad & Tobago, in a judgment from Sir Rabinder Singh, as we consider the constitutionality of sedition laws. Is sedition to ovague an offence to be legally certain? Can a guarantee of a ‘democratic’ State in the constitution be enough to strike a law down? Does Australian case law have any relevance? Listen to find out!

Link to Case: [2023] UKPC 36, T&T

Legal Style Blog homepage

Twitter: @legalstyleblog

E-mail: editor@legalstyle.co.uk

Legal Style Blog Guide to Uniform Privy Council Citations

Attorney General v Maharaj [2023] UKPC 36, T&Tに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。