エピソード

  • Gladiator (2000)

    Gladiator (2000)
    2024/11/19
    Ridley Scott’s Gladiator (2000) wasn’t just a movie—it was an event, a cultural phenomenon that revived the sword-and-sandal epic for a modern audience. In this week’s Born to Watch podcast episode, we take a deep dive with our Gladiator (2000) Movie Review, a timeless classic that set the bar for historical dramas, earning critical acclaim and five Academy Awards, including Best Picture. With stunning visuals, a poignant score, and unforgettable performances, Gladiator remains one of cinema’s greatest achievements.The Story That Defined a GenerationAt its core, Gladiator is a revenge tale wrapped in the grandeur of the Roman Empire. Russell Crowe stars as Maximus Decimus Meridius, a loyal Roman general betrayed by the scheming Commodus, played with unsettling intensity by Joaquin Phoenix. Stripped of his rank, family, and freedom, Maximus is forced into the brutal world of gladiatorial combat. As he rises through the ranks of the arena, he becomes a beacon of hope and rebellion, culminating in a battle not just for his life but for the soul of Rome itself.What makes Gladiator resonate so deeply is its ability to blend intimate human drama with epic stakes. Maximus’s vendetta against Commodus intertwines with his larger quest for justice, making every clash in the Colosseum emotionally charged. The screenplay, penned by David Franzoni, John Logan, and William Nicholson, is poetic and visceral, delivering lines like “Are you not entertained?” that have become iconic in pop culture.A Visual and Sonic MasterpieceRidley Scott is a director known for his meticulous attention to detail, and Gladiator is no exception. The film’s portrayal of ancient Rome is nothing short of breathtaking. Using a mix of practical sets, CGI, and miniatures, Scott and cinematographer John Mathieson recreated the grandeur of the Colosseum and the chaotic energy of Rome’s streets with staggering realism.Equally stunning is Hans Zimmer and Lisa Gerrard’s haunting score. The music perfectly captures the film’s shifting tones, from the mournful longing of Maximus’s loss to the triumphant swell of his victories. Tracks like “Now We Are Free” remain synonymous with the film’s legacy, blending orchestral power with ethereal vocals to evoke an almost mythic quality.A Performance for the AgesRussell Crowe’s portrayal of Maximus is the beating heart of Gladiator. His transformation from a respected general to a vengeful gladiator is physically demanding and emotionally rich. Crowe embodies Maximus with a quiet intensity, delivering a performance that won him the Academy Award for Best Actor. His ability to convey a deep well of grief, determination, and defiance elevates the character into the realm of timeless cinematic heroes.Joaquin Phoenix’s Commodus, on the other hand, is a masterclass in villainy. He’s not just evil for the sake of it—he’s deeply insecure, desperate for approval, and chillingly manipulative. Phoenix walks a delicate line, making Commodus repulsive yet compelling, a character you can’t look away from, no matter how despicable his actions.The supporting cast, including Connie Nielsen as the morally torn Lucilla and Richard Harris as the wise Emperor Marcus Aurelius, rounds out the ensemble with gravitas and depth. Even in smaller roles, the film excels in giving its characters memorable moments that add richness to the world.Themes That Echo Through HistoryGladiator isn’t just a feast for the senses—it’s a film that grapples with timeless themes. Justice, loyalty, and the corrupting nature of power all play pivotal roles in the story. Maximus’s journey is as much about reclaiming his honour as it is toppling a corrupt regime. His mantra, “What we do in life echoes in eternity,” underscores the film’s meditation on legacy and the impact of our actions.The movie also speaks to the enduring appeal of underdog stories. Maximus’s rise from slave to hero taps into a universal desire for justice and redemption, making his triumphs all the more cathartic. At the same time, the film doesn’t shy away from the brutality of its world, reminding us that victory often comes at a high cost.A Lasting LegacyWhen Gladiator hit theatres in 2000, it reignited interest in historical epics, paving the way for films like Troy, 300, and Kingdom of Heaven. But few have matched its impact. Its influence extends beyond the genre, inspiring video games, TV series, and countless parodies in pop culture.The film’s success also cemented Ridley Scott’s reputation as a visionary director and launched Russell Crowe into superstardom. It remains a benchmark for storytelling and craftsmanship, a movie that feels as fresh and powerful today as it did over two decades ago.Why We Still Love GladiatorSo why does Gladiator still hold such a special place in our hearts? Part of it is the sheer spectacle—few films manage to combine action, drama, and historical detail so seamlessly. But more ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 47 分
  • Anchorman (2004)

    Anchorman (2004)
    2024/11/12
    Few films define absurdist comedy, as well as Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy (2004). Directed by Adam McKay and starring Will Ferrell as the legendary, moustachioed newscaster Ron Burgundy, Anchorman carved a bold path through comedy with an all-star cast, offbeat humour, and unforgettable quotes that have lingered in pop culture. In this Anchorman (2004) Movie Review, we’re diving deep into what makes this cult classic not just a film but an icon of comedy—and one of the most quotable movies of all time.Plot and Characters: When News Was KingSet in the 1970s, a time when "men were men" and women "stayed at home," the story centres around the fictional KVWN Channel 4 News Team, led by the famously self-assured and sometimes painfully oblivious Ron Burgundy. Alongside Ron, we meet his team of misfits: the weather-savvy, clueless Brick Tamland (Steve Carell); overconfident field reporter Brian Fantana (Paul Rudd); and sports anchor Champ Kind (David Koechner), who lives for high fives and pep talks. These characters create a backdrop of harmless but hilarious masculinity that clashes sharply when Veronica Corningstone (Christina Applegate) joins the team as the station’s first female anchor.Anchorman’s setup brilliantly juxtaposes the absurdly sexist mindset of its male leads against Veronica’s ambition, highlighting the shifting social norms of the time. The plot might be thin—it's mostly about Ron and Veronica battling it out for the anchor position—but it’s rich in comedic material. It’s a satire of news culture, masculinity, and the competitive, ego-fueled world of media that remains relevant today.A Perfect Cast: Comedy’s All-Stars UniteWhat makes Anchorman shine is its cast, an ensemble of comedy heavyweights who bring McKay and Ferrell’s vision to life. Will Ferrell is flawless as Ron Burgundy, balancing his bumbling arrogance with just enough charm to make you root for him even as he gets himself into deeper trouble. Ferrell's embodiment of Ron’s obliviousness and blustering bravado became instantly iconic; it’s hard to imagine anyone else playing the role.Meanwhile, Steve Carell’s Brick Tamland is a masterpiece of deadpan comedy. With lines like “I love lamp,” Carell captures a character so endearing yet clueless that it’s impossible not to laugh. Paul Rudd’s Brian Fantana is the epitome of 70s coolness gone hilariously wrong, especially during his “Sex Panther” cologne debacle—a bit so absurdly funny it’s now a classic in itself. David Koechner, as Champ Kind, rounds out the team with his absurdly aggressive, often over-the-top take on sports reporting. Each character is individually funny, but together, they create an ensemble that works on a level of comedic chemistry that’s rarely matched.Christina Applegate’s Veronica is the perfect foil to the bumbling news team. Applegate’s character is strong-willed, determined, and smart—qualities that make her the film’s moral compass but never dull the humour. Veronica’s arc gives Anchorman a unique edge, creating a comedy with an unexpectedly solid message about the power of women in the workplace, wrapped in layers of absurdity.Improvised Brilliance: McKay and Ferrell’s Signature ComedyMuch of Anchorman’s magic comes from its improvisational style. Adam McKay and Will Ferrell wrote a loose script, allowing the cast the freedom to riff and play off each other’s quirks. This is a huge part of the film’s charm; the lines feel spontaneous, and the cast’s reactions are genuine. Some of the most memorable scenes, such as the Channel 4 news team’s infamous back alley brawl with rival news stations, are the result of this improvisational approach. The “news fight” scene, which features cameos from Ben Stiller, Vince Vaughn, and even Tim Robbins, is so outlandish it has become legendary. It encapsulates what makes Anchorman special—a wild mix of unpredictability and commitment to the bit.McKay’s direction leans heavily on satire, poking fun at the masculinity and trivial self-importance of the news business, especially in an era where anchors were often worshipped as local celebrities. McKay and Ferrell’s collaboration laid the groundwork for a style of humour that would define future hits like Step Brothers and Talladega Nights, blending absurdity with a hint of social commentary.Cultural Impact: Ron Burgundy’s Lasting LegacyAnchorman isn’t just a comedy; it’s a cultural phenomenon that has transcended the screen. Lines like “Stay classy, San Diego,” “I’m kind of a big deal,” and “Great Odin’s raven!” have made their way into everyday conversation, solidifying Ron Burgundy’s place in pop culture. The film even spawned a sequel, 2013’s Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues, although many fans argue the original remains untouchable. This lasting impact speaks to the film’s perfect combination of hilarious writing, iconic characters, and the kind of ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 57 分
  • Snatch (2000)

    Snatch (2000)
    2024/11/05
    In the world of British crime cinema, few films capture the frenetic energy and dark humour of the underworld quite like Snatch (2000). Directed by Guy Ritchie, Snatch is a heist film on steroids, merging British grit with slapstick absurdity and a labyrinthine plot filled with double-crosses stolen diamonds, and unlikely heroes. For our latest Born to Watch podcast episode, we dive into what makes Snatch such a stand-out in the crime genre and why its impact remains strong 20 years after its release. This Snatch (2000) Movie Review covers everything from the stellar cast to Ritchie’s stylistic choices and how the film has influenced the genre and pop culture.Plot and Style: A High-Speed Crime CaperSnatch tells two intertwined stories. The first follows Turkish (Jason Statham), an ambitious underground boxing promoter, who gets roped into an unlicensed fight by gangster Brick Top (Alan Ford). Meanwhile, the second story revolves around a stolen 84-carat diamond that makes its way across a host of unscrupulous characters, including small-time thieves, corrupt jewellers, and an indestructible bare-knuckle boxer named Mickey O'Neil (Brad Pitt). The film’s gritty and energetic style pulls the viewer through London’s seedy streets with whip-fast edits, slow-motion shots, and a darkly comic lens.Guy Ritchie’s directing style is on full display here. Quick cuts, freeze frames, and a playful, punchy soundtrack make the film a sensory assault, capturing the chaos of its characters’ lives. From the first minute, Snatch establishes a hyper-kinetic pace that doesn’t let up, demanding the audience’s full attention. It's a tricky balance, but Ritchie pulls it off, giving us a film that’s as smart and clever as it is chaotic and loud.An Ensemble Cast With Star Power and ChemistryOne of Snatch’s most notable aspects is its eclectic, all-star cast. The ensemble cast brings to life a colourful array of characters, each with its quirks and memorable traits. Jason Statham, then a relatively unknown actor, is captivating as Turkish, the film’s down-on-his-luck protagonist whose deadpan delivery and cool demeanour ground the story’s wild twists. Turkish’s partner, Tommy (Stephen Graham), provides a comedic counterbalance, stumbling through one mishap after another.Brad Pitt’s performance as a thickly accented Irish Traveler and bare-knuckle boxing champion, Mickey O'Neil, is unforgettable. Pitt’s choice to adopt a nearly indecipherable accent adds an extra layer of humour and mystique to the character. Known as the “Pikey,” Mickey steals scenes with his charm, unpredictability, and sheer fighting prowess. Rumour has it that Pitt’s accent was intentionally difficult to understand as a creative solution after he struggled with a convincing English accent. Whatever the reason, it works perfectly, adding a layer of intrigue and hilarity that no one could have anticipated.Benicio Del Toro, Dennis Farina, Rade Sherbedgia, and Alan Ford round out the cast with standout performances. Ford’s Brick Top is especially menacing as he delivers brutal monologues about pigs, body disposal, and the world of underground fighting. Each actor brings their A-game, giving the film an international flavour and highlighting Ritchie’s knack for directing ensembles.The Dark Humor: Punchlines in the Punch-UpsRitchie’s use of dark humour is central to Snatch’s identity. The film revels in its comedic violence and absurd situations, balancing tension with perfectly timed humour. From the unintentionally humorous attempts of small-time crooks like Sol (Lennie James) and Vinny (Robbie Gee) to pull off a diamond heist to the over-the-top cruelty of Brick Top, the film walks the fine line between horror and hilarity. Ritchie doesn’t just throw humour in as a way to lighten the mood—it’s a critical part of the story and its characters, making Snatch feel as if you’re watching a crime film through a cracked mirror.The humour also shows up in the dialogue, with quotable lines that stick long after the credits roll. Whether it’s Turkish’s dry observations, Mickey’s barely intelligible but somehow hilarious quips, or Brick Top’s chilling speeches, Snatch knows how to keep the audience entertained. Ritchie’s dialogue is sharp and fast-paced, mixing British slang with witty banter, making it endlessly rewatchable and quotable.Cultural Impact and Lasting AppealWhen Snatch hit theatres in 2000, it was an instant hit among fans of British gangster films, establishing Ritchie as a definitive voice in the genre. With its stylised violence, witty script, and memorable characters, Snatch quickly became a cult classic. It inspired a new wave of British crime cinema, with directors and writers noting Ritchie’s energetic approach to storytelling. Films and shows that followed, like Layer Cake and even Peaky Blinders, borrow elements of Ritchie’s unique style.Snatch is more than just a genre film; it also ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 44 分
  • Joker: Folie à Deux - Quick Review

    Joker: Folie à Deux - Quick Review
    2024/11/01

    Joker: Folie à Deux is a follow-up that takes the foundations of 2019’s Joker and, quite frankly, leaves them in the dust. Directed once again by Todd Phillips, this sequel trades in the raw, grounded intensity of the first film for a flashy, surreal spectacle that feels jarringly out of place. Where Joker delivered a chilling psychological portrait of Arthur Fleck’s descent into madness, Folie à Deux seems content with superficial theatrics and stylistic excess, abandoning the careful character work that made Arthur’s story so compelling.

    The most controversial creative choice here? It has to be the musical element, which feels entirely at odds with the film’s established tone. Instead of maintaining the gritty, unnerving realism that defined Arthur’s journey, Phillips dives headfirst into a musical fantasy. This choice doesn’t just feel unexpected—it feels unearned. The inclusion of song and dance numbers, mainly to explore Arthur’s connection to Harley Quinn (played by Lady Gaga), strips away much of the intensity that defined the original, leaving us with a tonal clash that undermines the story's impact.

    Speaking of Harley, Lady Gaga is a powerhouse performer, and her casting could have been an exciting way to explore a fascinating and complex character. However, the film doesn’t do her justice. Rather than giving us a nuanced, intricate look at Harley and Arthur’s relationship, Folie à Deux opts for surface-level theatrics that barely scratch the depth these characters deserve. While intriguing, the chemistry between Phoenix and Gaga is undercut by a script that treats their dynamic as little more than a visually striking spectacle rather than a fully developed relationship. Instead of a true exploration of love and chaos, what we get feels like a stylised portrayal of toxic romance without the emotional weight needed to make it resonate.

    It’s disappointing to see Phillips drift so far from the gritty realism that defined Joker. The first film was a brutal examination of a broken man shaped by a broken world, blending tragedy and horror with an uncomfortably close-to-home critique of society. In Folie à Deux, however, Arthur’s journey seems almost incidental, overshadowed by Phillips’ desire to create something visually bold and tonally eclectic. We’re left with a spectacle, but not the kind that delivers any true insight or depth.

    Overall, Joker: Folie à Deux feels more concerned with aesthetics than substance. The unsettling descent into madness that Joker perfected is sacrificed here, replaced by a style-over-story approach that feels, at best, a creative gamble that didn’t pay off. Fans hoping for a continuation of Arthur Fleck’s dark, unflinching narrative may find themselves disappointed as this sequel veers wildly off course, trading a complex character study for flashy, hollow musical numbers and a superficial take on love and chaos.

    If you loved the gritty, psychologically charged experience of the first Joker, this follow-up might leave you wondering why Phillips chose to take Arthur’s story in such a drastically different and ultimately less impactful direction.

    Please follow the Podcast and join our community at

    https://linktr.ee/borntowatchpodcast

    https://www.borntowatch.com.au/
    続きを読む 一部表示
    25 分
  • Misery (1990)

    Misery (1990)
    2024/10/29
    If ever there was a film that brings true terror out of something as every day as fan meeting their idol, Stephen King’s Misery (1990) is that film. Directed by Rob Reiner and based on the bestselling novel by Stephen King, Misery tells a haunting story that swaps out supernatural threats for the all-too-real horror of human obsession. Released at the dawn of the '90s and now over 30 years old, Misery remains one of the most potent psychological horror films of our time. It is a perfect Halloween watch for those who seek more tension than jump scares.Misery centres on novelist Paul Sheldon (James Caan), a successful author famous for his romance series about a character named Misery. After a car accident in a snowstorm, Paul is “rescued” by Annie Wilkes (Kathy Bates), a devoted fan who happens to be a nurse—and who also happens to be completely unhinged. When Annie discovers that Paul has killed off her beloved Misery in his latest manuscript, she takes the word “fanatic” to a horrifying new level. A tightly contained, claustrophobic thriller ensues that leaves viewers on the edge of their seats, not with gore or traditional horror imagery, but with an unrelenting, stomach-turning tension.One of the most striking elements of Misery is its setting. From the moment Paul wakes up in Annie’s isolated, snow-locked farmhouse, the world shrinks, trapping both Paul and the audience in an increasingly claustrophobic space where the only two characters are locked in a power struggle. Annie’s house becomes a cage, meticulously designed to feel familiar and suffocating, with its well-worn furnishings masking a deadly intensity underneath. The snow-covered landscape outside reflects this feeling—cold, remote, and unforgiving. It’s a classic King setting that director Rob Reiner uses to maximum effect, making the walls of that farmhouse press ever closer as Annie’s mental state deteriorates.Kathy Bates’ performance as Annie Wilkes is legendary, and rightly so. In what became her career-defining role, Bates brings vulnerability and sheer terror to the character, infusing Annie with a disarming sweetness that makes her psychosis even more chilling. She is charming one moment, terrifying the next—a character who could exist in real life and who taps into our deepest fears about trusting the wrong people. With almost no warning, the scenes where she switches from gentle caretaker to vengeful captor reveal Bates’ extraordinary range and leave viewers with a sense of helpless dread. Her portrayal of Annie won her the Academy Award for Best Actress, a rare honour for a horror performance and one that cemented her place in film history.Opposite Bates, James Caan delivers a nuanced performance as Paul Sheldon. Though Paul starts as a somewhat self-absorbed writer who wants to escape his romantic series, Caan’s portrayal evolves as he faces Annie’s wrath. Caan captures Paul’s vulnerability and determination, making his transformation from a helpless captive to a man desperate for survival both believable and gripping. His character is put through unimaginable psychological and physical torture, but his resilience offers a glimmer of hope amidst the nightmare. Caan and Bates create a twisted, unforgettable dynamic that keeps the film’s tension at a fever pitch.One of the film’s most famous—and undeniably hardest-to-watch—scenes is the “hobbling” sequence, in which Annie punishes Paul in a shocking act of violence to prevent his escape. The scene is iconic not just for its brutality but also for how it embodies the film’s emotional and psychological stakes. By physically maiming him, Annie shows just how deeply she is willing to go to keep her fantasy alive. Her twisted affection is at its apex here, making viewers squirm from the sight and the implications of her actions. The scene became infamous in horror cinema and is arguably more memorable for the psychological horror it encapsulates than for its actual violence. For many, it is the film's defining moment, encapsulating its unflinching approach to the terror of captivity.Reiner, known primarily for his work in comedies and dramas (When Harry Met Sally, Stand by Me), was an unexpected but brilliant choice to direct this adaptation. He understood that Misery would benefit from a restrained approach, choosing tension over blood and psychological horror over spectacle. This restraint is a large part of what makes the movie so unsettling. The viewer is always left dreading what Annie might do next, imagining the horrors rather than seeing them explicitly laid out. Reiner’s style here elevates Misery from a straightforward thriller to a layered character study, forcing audiences to confront the darkness in everyday people and situations.Beyond its immediate impact, Misery has left a lasting influence on pop culture, particularly how it portrays fan obsession. Annie’s character has become a cultural symbol for the idea of the ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 34 分
  • Enemy of the State (1998)

    Enemy of the State (1998)
    2024/10/22
    When we look back at late-90s cinema, few films hit the nerve of an era quite like Enemy of the State (1998). Directed by Tony Scott and produced by Jerry Bruckheimer, the film was released when the internet was still in its infancy, and the public’s understanding of digital surveillance was minimal at best. Fast-forward to today and Enemy of the State feels less like a cautionary tale and more like a prediction of the modern world.Starring Will Smith in one of his first dramatic leading roles and featuring a powerhouse cast that includes Gene Hackman, Jon Voight, and Lisa Bonet, Enemy of the State blends action, espionage, and paranoia in a way that makes it both thrilling and eerily relevant. The movie’s central theme—how the government can use technology to monitor citizens—is more pertinent now than in 1998. But beyond the social commentary, Enemy of the State is a tightly wound conspiracy thriller that still manages to entertain on its most basic level: sheer adrenaline.A Case of Wrong Place, Wrong TimeThe film kicks off with the murder of a U.S. Congressman by a high-ranking NSA official, played with chilling authority by Jon Voight. This event sets the stage for the film’s exploration of the dark side of government surveillance. The plot follows Robert Clayton Dean (Will Smith), a successful labour lawyer, who unwittingly becomes entangled in this conspiracy when an old acquaintance slips him a videotape containing evidence of the congressman’s murder.Dean, who has no idea that he has this tape, quickly finds himself the target of the NSA’s surveillance and an orchestrated takedown. His life is turned upside down as his bank accounts are frozen, his credit cards are cancelled, and an omniscient digital eye monitors his every move. The tension only builds as Dean is forced to team up with a former NSA operative, Brill (Gene Hackman), who helps him understand the depth of the conspiracy he’s caught up in.Surveillance and Paranoia in the Digital AgeEnemy of the State stands out because it effectively tackles the theme of surveillance in the digital age. Released during a time when most of us still viewed the internet as little more than a novelty, the film was ahead of its time in predicting just how pervasive technology would become in our everyday lives. From satellite tracking to phone tapping, Scott’s direction makes it clear that there’s nowhere to hide in this tech-driven world.At the heart of the film is a fear that resonates with many today: the loss of privacy. The movie asks a question that feels more urgent in the 2020s than in the 1990s—how much power should governments have to monitor their citizens in the name of security? While Enemy of the State doesn’t provide any clear answers, it succeeds in making us feel uneasy, particularly as the line between safety and invasion of privacy blurs.In hindsight, the film’s plot is almost prophetic. In an era post-Snowden, with revelations of mass government surveillance by agencies like the NSA, Enemy of the State seems less far-fetched and more like a stark reality. This prescience is one of the reasons the film holds up so well over two decades later.Will Smith: A Star in the MakingAt the time of its release, Enemy of the State was a significant departure for Will Smith, who was best known for his comedic roles in The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air and blockbuster action flicks like Independence Day. As Robert Clayton Dean, Smith delivers a more nuanced and serious performance, proving that he can handle roles that require more than just one-liners and charm. His portrayal of an everyman caught in a nightmare scenario is both believable and sympathetic, grounding the film’s high-concept premise in a relatable human experience.Smith’s chemistry with Gene Hackman is another highlight. Hackman, who plays the paranoid, world-weary former NSA agent, brings gravitas to every scene he’s in, making Brill a character that feels like he could have walked right out of another conspiracy thriller—The Conversation (1974), for instance, which Hackman also starred in. Their dynamic, a blend of mentor and reluctant ally, adds a layer of emotional depth to the film, giving it more weight than your average action thriller.Tony Scott’s Signature Style: Tension on OverdriveTony Scott, known for his kinetic and visually dynamic style, brings his A-game to Enemy of the State. The film is packed with fast-paced action sequences and explosive set pieces that we’ve come to expect from Scott, but what sets it apart from other late-90s thrillers is how well it builds and sustains tension.The chase sequences, for example, are relentless, and Scott uses surveillance tools—cameras, monitors, satellites—to create a sense of claustrophobia. The viewer is constantly reminded that Dean is being watched, tracked, and hunted. Even in scenes where nothing overtly dangerous is happening, the ever-present hum of technology keeps the tension alive....
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 35 分
  • The Rock (1996)

    The Rock (1996)
    2024/10/15

    When it comes to 90s action movies, The Rock (1996) is an absolute powerhouse, packing in all the adrenaline, explosions, and star power you'd expect from a Michael Bay film. This high-octane blockbuster fuses a prison break with a military conspiracy, creating a wild ride that still holds up almost 30 years later.

    At its core, The Rock combines the thrilling escapism of an action movie with a surprisingly engaging plot. The story kicks off when a group of rogue U.S. Marines, led by the stoic General Hummel (played by the legendary Ed Harris), seizes Alcatraz Island and threatens to launch chemical weapons on San Francisco. The government assembles a rather unusual duo to thwart the attack: Dr. Stanley Goodspeed (a quirky and nerdy Nicolas Cage) and John Mason (Sean Connery, effortlessly cool as a former British SAS operative). Mason is the only man ever to have successfully escaped Alcatraz, making him the key to breaking back into the "rock" and stopping the impending disaster.

    What sets The Rock apart from other 90s action films is its all-star cast and their ability to bring depth to what could have been one-note characters. Connery, in particular, steals every scene he's in, bringing both gravitas and sly humour. Cage’s Goodspeed is a fish out of water, providing a balance to Connery’s seasoned warrior. Their dynamic delivers much of the film’s heart and unexpected comedic moments. Meanwhile, Harris’ Hummel is a villain with depth—a man who believes he’s fighting for a noble cause, adding emotional layers to the otherwise explosive spectacle.

    Visually, Michael Bay’s signature style is all over the screen. Expect dizzying action sequences, perfectly timed slow-motion shots, and some truly unforgettable set pieces, including car chases through the streets of San Francisco and tense scenes inside the ominous Alcatraz prison. Bay knows how to amp up the intensity, and Hans Zimmer’s pulse-pounding score keeps your heart racing right alongside the action.

    What makes The Rock such a standout is its ability to blend the best of 90s action excess with memorable performances and an engaging narrative. It’s a film that doesn't just rely on explosions but instead crafts a fun, fast-paced story around them. For fans of action movies, this is one of the decade’s must-see films, offering pure entertainment from start to finish.

    Why It Still Matters:

    The Rock endures as one of the best action movies of its era. It captures the quintessential 90s action formula while pushing its limits with a more intricate story and standout performances. Connery’s role as the aging but unbreakable Mason remains a defining one, while Cage’s Goodspeed is a great mix of quirky and capable, perfectly capturing the “unlikely hero” archetype. Add in the film’s gripping premise, explosive action, and a truly memorable villain, you’ve got a recipe for a classic.

    For fans of Born to Watch, The Rock is an ideal discussion piece—it’s pure popcorn entertainment with just enough emotional complexity to elevate it above other action flicks of its time. Whether it's your first time seeing it or your 50th, it’s a movie that never fails to entertain.

    Please follow the Podcast and join our community at

    https://linktr.ee/borntowatchpodcast

    https://www.borntowatch.com.au/
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 47 分
  • Tropic Thunder (2008)

    Tropic Thunder (2008)
    2024/10/08
    When it comes to biting satire and outrageous humour, Tropic Thunder remains a standout in the annals of Hollywood comedies. Released in 2008, this film, directed by Ben Stiller, is a unique blend of action, absurdity, and razor-sharp commentary on the entertainment industry itself. In this Tropic Thunder Movie Review, we dive deep into the film’s multilayered humour, its over-the-top performances, and the controversies that have kept it relevant long after its initial release.Plot Breakdown and SetupTropic Thunder follows the chaotic production of a Vietnam War film that spirals out of control when its pampered, clueless actors are dropped into the jungle for some “method” filmmaking. What starts as a fictional movie quickly devolves into real-life danger, though the cast has no idea they are no longer pretending. The plot is as meta as it gets—a movie about making a movie, where the line between fiction and reality is hilariously blurred.Ben Stiller plays Tugg Speedman, a fading action star desperately seeking credibility by taking on a “serious” role in a war drama. His co-stars include Kirk Lazarus (played by Robert Downey Jr.), a multiple Oscar-winning actor who undergoes a controversial pigment alteration surgery to play a Black soldier, and Jeff Portnoy (Jack Black), a drug-addicted comedian known for his gross-out humour. Alongside them are Kevin Sandusky (Jay Baruchel), the earnest newbie, and Alpa Chino (Brandon T. Jackson), a rapper-turned-actor trying to maintain his street cred. As the film's director loses control, the actors must survive real threats in the jungle, thinking it's all part of the shoot.A Satirical Punch to Hollywood’s EgoAt its core, Tropic Thunder is an unflinching satire of Hollywood excess, egotism, and the absurd lengths actors go to in search of acclaim. The film skewers method acting, self-important stars, and the exploitative nature of the movie business. Ben Stiller, who not only stars but directs, doesn’t shy away from poking fun at the very industry that made him famous.Stiller’s Tugg Speedman embodies the desperation of actors clinging to their fading stardom. His previous attempts to earn respect as a serious actor—most notably in the disastrous Simple Jack, where he plays a mentally disabled man—are a clear jab at how Hollywood sometimes exploits sensitive topics for awards. The film pulls no punches in exposing the cynical calculation behind some “prestige” performances.Robert Downey Jr.’s portrayal of Kirk Lazarus, a method actor who famously “doesn’t break character until the DVD commentary,” takes method acting to absurd extremes. The decision for Lazarus to undergo a skin pigmentation procedure to play a Black character is undeniably provocative, pushing the boundaries of satire in ways that sparked debate even upon the film’s release. The character is a vehicle for Tropic Thunder to critique the pretentiousness of actors who go to unhealthy or inappropriate lengths to inhabit their roles—without excusing the controversial nature of Lazarus’s arc.Meanwhile, Jack Black’s Jeff Portnoy represents a different Hollywood trope: the comedic actor known for lowbrow, bodily-function-driven humour who secretly longs for artistic respect. Black leans into this portrayal with reckless abandon, turning Portnoy into a parody of a certain kind of comedian trapped by his own public persona.The Performances: A Career High for Downey Jr.Though the entire cast delivers hilarious performances, Robert Downey Jr. steals the show with his portrayal of Kirk Lazarus. His commitment to the role is complete, both playing up the absurdity of Lazarus’s method acting and delivering an authentic, sharp commentary on Hollywood's more troubling habits. Downey Jr.’s performance walks a very fine line—one that could have easily veered into offensive territory. However, by using the character to critique the very behaviour he is embodying, the role becomes an effective, albeit a controversial, form of satire. His role earned him an Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actor, cementing it as one of the most memorable comedic performances of the 2000s.Ben Stiller’s turn as the washed-up action star is also noteworthy, mainly because his character serves as the audience’s guide through the absurdity of the film's events. Stiller’s deadpan delivery and earnest attempts at drama make Tugg Speedman’s cluelessness all the more entertaining.Jack Black, as Jeff Portnoy, veers into more chaotic, physical comedy, adding a layer of absurd humour to the group’s dynamic. His struggles with drug addiction while lost in the jungle add a layer of vulnerability to the otherwise outlandish character.Controversy and Cultural ImpactTropic Thunder courted its fair share of controversy upon release, particularly for its portrayal of Kirk Lazarus and its use of blackface as a satirical device. Robert Downey Jr. defended the role as an exploration of...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 52 分