• Cause Before Symptom

  • 著者： James Carner
  • ポッドキャスト

Cause Before Symptom

著者： James Carner
無料で聴く

  • サマリー

  • Pastor James Carner breaks down the real controllers of the world and their divide and conquer plans for a satanic utopia where only a select few will reign over a small population of adrogenous, complacent workers.
    Copyright 2024 - All rights reserved
    続きを読む 一部表示

あらすじ・解説

Pastor James Carner breaks down the real controllers of the world and their divide and conquer plans for a satanic utopia where only a select few will reign over a small population of adrogenous, complacent workers.
Copyright 2024 - All rights reserved
社会科学
続きを読む 一部表示
エピソード
  • The Dark Enlightenment: New Corporate America

    The Dark Enlightenment: New Corporate America
    2025/02/22
    The Dark Enlightenment: New Corporate America Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6ntsax-the-dark-enlightenment-new-corporate-america.html The Dark Enlightenment, also known as Neo-Reactionary Thought (NRx), is a political and philosophical movement that emerged in the early 21st century as a critique of modern liberal democracy, egalitarianism, and progressive values. It was popularized by the blogger Mencius Moldbug (Curtis Yarvin) in the mid-2000s, who argued that democracy is fundamentally flawed, inefficient, and corrupt. Instead, he advocated for a return to hierarchical, authoritarian, or even monarchist systems of governance, drawing inspiration from pre-Enlightenment traditions. The movement's name, Dark Enlightenment, was coined by the British philosopher Nick Land, who expanded upon Yarvin’s ideas, integrating them with his own cybernetic and accelerationist perspectives. Land characterized liberal democracy as a declining force and viewed technocratic or corporate governance as a possible successor. The origins of the Dark Enlightenment lie in several intellectual traditions, including reactionary political thought, classical conservatism, and critiques of democracy found in thinkers like Thomas Carlyle and Joseph de Maistre. It also draws from Silicon Valley’s libertarianism and the broader online countercultural backlash against progressive ideology. The movement gained traction among certain technologists, political dissidents, and intellectuals disillusioned with modern governance, arguing that traditional power structures—such as monarchy, corporate rule, or decentralized city-states—are more stable and effective than democratic systems. The Dark Enlightenment is explicitly anti-egalitarian, believing that natural hierarchies should dictate social and political organization. If the ideals of the Dark Enlightenment were fully implemented, it is unclear what name this new system would take, as it depends on the specific form it assumes. Some proponents envision a "corporate monarchy", where governance is run like a well-managed company, while others suggest a "patchwork" model, where independent, competing city-states replace nation-states. Another possibility is a technocratic aristocracy, where governance is dictated by elite experts rather than elected representatives. Whatever form it takes, such a system would likely be named based on its defining characteristic—whether that be monarchy, technocracy, or decentralized governance. However, critics argue that any such implementation would likely resemble historical autocracies rather than a novel or improved system. A corporate monarchy is a system of governance where the state is structured like a private corporation, with power concentrated in the hands of a single executive, often a CEO-like ruler or monarch. This ruler is not elected by the public but instead appointed, inherited, or chosen based on meritocratic principles. Decision-making in a corporate monarchy is centralized, operating on efficiency, profitability, and long-term stability rather than public opinion or mass participation. The administration functions similarly to a business, where different sectors are managed by specialized executives or technocrats who answer directly to the sovereign authority. The guiding principle of such a system is order, hierarchy, and expertise over populist sentiment. Supporters of this model argue that it eliminates bureaucratic inefficiencies, prevents political instability caused by frequent elections, and ensures that governance is handled by the most competent individuals rather than those who are merely popular. In contrast, a democracy is a political system where power is distributed among the people, typically through elected representatives. Decision-making is based on majority rule, with policies shaped by public discourse, voting, and debate. Democracy values participation, individual rights, and political accountability, aiming to balance the interests of different social groups through mechanisms like free elections, checks and balances, and constitutional safeguards. Unlike a corporate monarchy, democracy assumes that governance should be responsive to the needs and desires of the population rather than dictated by a central authority. While this system promotes political freedom and representation, critics argue that it can lead to inefficiency, short-term policymaking driven by election cycles, and susceptibility to manipulation by mass media and interest groups. The fundamental difference between the two systems lies in how authority is legitimized and exercised. A corporate monarchy derives legitimacy from expertise, stability, and hierarchical control, while democracy derives legitimacy from the will of the people and collective decision-making. A corporate monarchy prioritizes efficiency and long-term strategic vision, often at the expense of public input, while democracy ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 38 分
  • Noble Cause Corruption: Dark Enlightenment

    Noble Cause Corruption: Dark Enlightenment
    2025/02/21
    Noble Cause Corruption: Dark Enlightenment Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6nf37f-noble-cause-corruption-dark-enlightenment.html Noble Cause Corruption is when law enforcement officers or other public officials engage in unethical or illegal behavior because they believe it serves a morally justified or greater good. Essentially, they justify wrongdoing by arguing that their actions help achieve justice. For example, a police officer might plant evidence on a known criminal to ensure a conviction, believing that the suspect would otherwise escape justice. While the officer's intent may be to protect society, their actions undermine due process, fairness, and the legal system’s integrity. This type of corruption is dangerous because it can erode public trust in institutions and lead to systemic abuses of power. It often starts with small ethical compromises but can escalate over time, creating a culture where misconduct is normalized as long as it appears to serve a "noble" purpose. In politics, Noble Cause Corruption refers to politicians or government officials engaging in unethical, illegal, or deceptive behavior under the justification that it serves a greater good, such as national security, economic stability, or social justice. This often involves manipulating facts, bypassing laws, or using morally questionable tactics to achieve what they believe is the "right" outcome for society. Examples in Politics Election Manipulation – A political leader justifies rigging an election because they believe their opponent would be disastrous for the country. Misinformation or Propaganda – Spreading false or misleading information to gain public support for policies that might not otherwise be accepted. Abuse of Power – Using government agencies or law enforcement to silence opposition, claiming it’s necessary to maintain stability or protect national interests. Unlawful Surveillance – Justifying mass surveillance or data collection to prevent crime or terrorism, even if it infringes on citizens' rights. Why It’s a Problem While the intent behind noble cause corruption may seem well-meaning, it ultimately weakens democracy, erodes trust in institutions, and can lead to authoritarian tendencies. It also creates a slippery slope where bending the rules becomes normalized, leading to larger abuses of power over time. Here are some notable instances: 1. Warren G. Harding Administration (1921–1923): Teapot Dome Scandal During President Harding's tenure, the Teapot Dome scandal emerged as a significant case of corruption. Secretary of the Interior Albert B. Fall leased Navy petroleum reserves at Teapot Dome, Wyoming, to private oil companies without competitive bidding, accepting substantial bribes in return. Fall justified his actions as necessary to support the nation's energy security, but the scandal severely damaged public trust in the government. 2. Richard Nixon Administration (1969–1974): Watergate Scandal President Nixon's involvement in the Watergate scandal is a prominent example of noble cause corruption. In an effort to secure re-election and maintain political stability, Nixon and his aides authorized illegal activities, including the break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters and subsequent cover-ups. They believed these actions were justified to protect the administration's agenda, but the scandal led to Nixon's resignation and a profound loss of faith in political institutions. 3. Ronald Reagan Administration (1981–1989): Iran-Contra Affair The Iran-Contra affair under President Reagan involved secretly facilitating arms sales to Iran, which was under an arms embargo, with the intent to fund Nicaraguan Contras and secure the release of hostages. Officials believed these covert operations were essential to combat communism and terrorism. However, the actions violated U.S. law and led to significant controversy, undermining the administration's credibility. 4. U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Rollback In 2025, President Donald Trump directed the Department of Justice to cease enforcing the FCPA, arguing it hindered U.S. economic competitiveness and national security. This act, established in 1977 to combat corporate bribery abroad, was seen by the administration as a barrier to international business. While intended to bolster the U.S. economy, this decision effectively provided leeway for corrupt practices, undermining global anti-corruption efforts. 5. Xi Jinping's Anti-Corruption Campaign Since 2012, Chinese President Xi Jinping has led an extensive anti-corruption campaign, disciplining over six million officials. While aimed at strengthening the Communist Party's integrity, the campaign has been criticized for targeting political adversaries and causing policy paralysis among bureaucrats. The pursuit of a "clean" government, though seemingly noble, has led to ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 52 分
  • Putin

    Putin
    2025/02/20
    Putin Watch this on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6mypb6-putin.html Vladimir Putin, Russia’s long-standing leader, is often seen as a figure of power, control, and mystery. However, his early years reveal a more nuanced picture of the man behind the political persona. Putin’s childhood, marked by hardship and resilience, has had a profound influence on his life and leadership, casting a shadow that continues to shape his decisions and worldview. Born in 1952 in Leningrad (now St. Petersburg), Putin grew up in a post-war Soviet Union, a time of scarcity and rebuilding. His family lived in a communal apartment, sharing limited space with other families—a common arrangement in the USSR. This environment fostered a sense of survival and adaptability in young Putin, traits that would later define his political career. Putin’s parents, particularly his father, a factory worker and WWII veteran, instilled in him a strong sense of discipline and patriotism. His father’s experiences during the war, including severe injuries sustained in combat, left a lasting impression on Putin, who grew up with a deep respect for the sacrifices made by previous generations. This upbringing likely contributed to his staunch nationalism and his emphasis on restoring Russia’s global influence. Despite the challenges of his early life, Putin was a determined and ambitious child. He developed an early interest in martial arts, particularly judo, which taught him the importance of strategy, patience, and control—qualities that would later become hallmarks of his political style. His passion for sports also provided an escape from the harsh realities of his surroundings and helped him build confidence and resilience. Putin’s childhood was not without its darker moments. He has spoken about facing bullies in his neighborhood, which forced him to stand up for himself and develop a tough exterior. This early exposure to conflict may have shaped his uncompromising approach to power and his belief in the necessity of strength in leadership. The economic and social struggles of his youth also left Putin with a deep skepticism of Western ideals and a preference for centralized authority. Growing up in a system where the state played a dominant role in everyday life, he became accustomed to a top-down approach to governance. This perspective has influenced his policies as Russia’s leader, from his consolidation of power to his resistance to Western-style democracy. In many ways, Putin’s childhood serves as a lens through which to understand his actions and decisions as a leader. The hardships he endured, the values he absorbed, and the lessons he learned during his formative years have all contributed to the complex and often controversial figure he is today. While his leadership has been marked by both achievements and criticisms, it is clear that the shadows of his past continue to shape his present. Scandals Vladimir Putin, Russia's long-serving leader, has been at the center of numerous controversies and scandals throughout his political career. These scandals span a wide range of issues, from allegations of political repression and authoritarianism to accusations of corruption and human rights violations. One of the most persistent criticisms of Putin is his suppression of political opposition. High-profile critics like Alexei Navalny have been imprisoned, and there have been numerous allegations of state-sponsored violence against dissidents, including the poisoning of Navalny and the deaths of other political rivals, such as Alexander Litvinenko, a former Russian spy who died in London from polonium-210 poisoning. These incidents have fueled accusations that Putin's government uses extreme measures to silence opposition. Another major area of controversy is Putin's alleged involvement in election interference, particularly in foreign countries. Russia has been accused of meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election through hacking and disinformation campaigns aimed at influencing the outcome. Similar allegations have emerged in other countries, leading to widespread condemnation and sanctions against Russia. Domestically, Putin has been criticized for consolidating power, including changes to Russia's constitution that allow him to extend his rule. Critics argue that these actions undermine democratic principles and concentrate power in the hands of a single leader. Corruption allegations have also dogged Putin throughout his career. Investigative reports, such as those by Alexei Navalny, have accused him of amassing vast personal wealth through corrupt practices, including owning lavish properties and benefiting from the wealth of oligarchs. While Putin has denied these claims, they have contributed to his controversial reputation on the global stage. The 2016 Panama Papers leak further fueled these allegations, revealing offshore financial dealings linked to Putin's inner ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 20 分
activate_buybox_copy_target_t1

Cause Before Symptomに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー：以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。

Audible.co.jp

Amazon.co.jp
レビューはまだありません。