• Comparación entre Racionalismo y Empirismo

  • 2025/02/11
  • 再生時間： 4 分
  • ポッドキャスト

Comparación entre Racionalismo y Empirismo

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

  • サマリー

  • In the podcast Comparación entre Racionalismo y Empirismo, the host Nahia explores and contrasts two significant philosophical schools: rationalism and empiricism. Rationalism, which stresses knowledge originating from reason and abstract ideas, is compared to empiricism, which heavily relies on sensory experiences and real-world observations for accumulating knowledge. The debate surfaces in the discussion of the origin of ideas, with rationalists arguing for innate understanding at birth versus empiricists standing for the 'tabula rasa' theory of the mind being a blank slate at birth. Rationalists' affinity for mathematics and empirical methodology is contrasted with empiricists' alignment with experimental sciences. The podcast also highlights the divergent views on 'a priori' and 'a posteriori' knowledge and discusses the significant proponents of each, namely René Descartes for rationalism and John Locke for empiricism. Nahia ends the discussion by encapsulating the key dissimilarities between rationalism and empiricism and their importance in shaping modern thought.
    続きを読む 一部表示

あらすじ・解説

In the podcast Comparación entre Racionalismo y Empirismo, the host Nahia explores and contrasts two significant philosophical schools: rationalism and empiricism. Rationalism, which stresses knowledge originating from reason and abstract ideas, is compared to empiricism, which heavily relies on sensory experiences and real-world observations for accumulating knowledge. The debate surfaces in the discussion of the origin of ideas, with rationalists arguing for innate understanding at birth versus empiricists standing for the 'tabula rasa' theory of the mind being a blank slate at birth. Rationalists' affinity for mathematics and empirical methodology is contrasted with empiricists' alignment with experimental sciences. The podcast also highlights the divergent views on 'a priori' and 'a posteriori' knowledge and discusses the significant proponents of each, namely René Descartes for rationalism and John Locke for empiricism. Nahia ends the discussion by encapsulating the key dissimilarities between rationalism and empiricism and their importance in shaping modern thought.
続きを読む 一部表示

Comparación entre Racionalismo y Empirismoに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー：以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。

Audible.co.jp

Amazon.co.jp
レビューはまだありません。