In this episode of the DEI Podcast, Max sits down with civil rights attorney and Senior Advisor at Democracy Forward, Sunu Chandy, to explore the shifting legal landscape of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs over a year after the Supreme Court’s historic decision to strike down affirmative action in college admissions.

Last June marked the one-year anniversary of this landmark ruling. In its wake, anti-equity organizations have sought to weaponize the courts against a range of DEI programs, creating legal challenges that have generated significant media attention and deterred law firms, executives, and administrators who fear litigation could stifle efforts to create fair and equitable workplaces.

But aside from the headlines, just how much have those suits actually accomplished? Have they had any real impact in the courts, or are they merely expensive distractions, with their earned media providing louder bark than legal bite?

Sunu recently led a new report that highlights key analyses following Democracy Forward’s review of over seventy cases brought by anti-equity actors against DEI-related programs across various contexts. The findings challenge the conventional wisdom surrounding these cases and suggest that SFFA has not fundamentally altered the legal frameworks in the vast majority of public and private sector contexts.

Read the full report from Democracy Forward here: https://democracyforward.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/DF-DEI-Report_Final-Proof_070224.pdf