E-filing outage cause a late filing? & other cases
2024/08/06
再生時間： 26 分
ポッドキャスト

カートのアイテムが多すぎます

ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。

カートに追加できませんでした。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました

ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました

E-filing outage cause a late filing? & other cases

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

サマリー
A ransomware attack hit the Los Angeles County Superior Court in July 2024, affecting e-filing services. Did you miss a filing deadline because of this? We discuss two Rules of Court that could help.
We also cover:
Are anti-SLAPP orders “judgments”?
Court of Appeal to litigants: Your adverbs are unwelcome here. Ok to say “The order is erroneous.” But not “The order is transparently erroneous.”
Appeal might be actually late, but constructively on time.
Two anti-tax initiatives struck down: one too broad, the other too narrow.
On HOA Christmas party ban, a split 9th Cir. panel with three opinions.
If you are “seriously annoying” you can get hit with a restraining order, but not for being regular annoying.
Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.
Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.
Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.
The California Appellate Law Podcast thanks Casetext for sponsoring the podcast. Listeners receive a discount on Casetext Basic Research at casetext.com/CALP. The co-hosts, Jeff and Tim, were also invited to try Casetext’s newest technology, CoCounsel, the world’s first AI legal assistant. You can discover CoCounsel for yourself with a demo and free trial at casetext.com/CoCounsel.
Other items discussed in the episode:
Lawyer Toolkit: Untimely Appeals May Be Excused If There Was a Mishap with E-Filing, discussing Garg v. Garg (2022) 82 Cal.App.5th 1036, 1041–1042
Are Anti-SLAPP orders “judgments”? Wastexperts, Inc. v. Arakelian Enters. (D2d4 Jul. 11, 2024 No. B325299) [pub. opn.] (Tim’s writeup)
Late appeal deemed constructively filed on time, In re Santos (D5 Jun. 6, 2024 No. F087859) [nonpub. opn.] (Tim’s writeup)
Keeton v. Tesla, Inc.: arb-killer late-fee penalty NOT preempted by FAA
Legislature v. Weber: Tax initiative held invalid because too broad
Loeber v. Lakeside Joint School District* Tax initiative held invalid because too narrow
Read the full article here: https://bit.ly/4dsSvL4
続きを読む一部表示

あらすじ・解説

A ransomware attack hit the Los Angeles County Superior Court in July 2024, affecting e-filing services. Did you miss a filing deadline because of this? We discuss two Rules of Court that could help.

We also cover:

Are anti-SLAPP orders “judgments”?
Court of Appeal to litigants: Your adverbs are unwelcome here. Ok to say “The order is erroneous.” But not “The order is transparently erroneous.”
Appeal might be actually late, but constructively on time.
Two anti-tax initiatives struck down: one too broad, the other too narrow.
On HOA Christmas party ban, a split 9th Cir. panel with three opinions.
If you are “seriously annoying” you can get hit with a restraining order, but not for being regular annoying.

Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.

Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.

Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.

The California Appellate Law Podcast thanks Casetext for sponsoring the podcast. Listeners receive a discount on Casetext Basic Research at casetext.com/CALP. The co-hosts, Jeff and Tim, were also invited to try Casetext’s newest technology, CoCounsel, the world’s first AI legal assistant. You can discover CoCounsel for yourself with a demo and free trial at casetext.com/CoCounsel.

Other items discussed in the episode:

Lawyer Toolkit: Untimely Appeals May Be Excused If There Was a Mishap with E-Filing, discussing Garg v. Garg (2022) 82 Cal.App.5th 1036, 1041–1042
Are Anti-SLAPP orders “judgments”? Wastexperts, Inc. v. Arakelian Enters. (D2d4 Jul. 11, 2024 No. B325299) [pub. opn.] (Tim’s writeup)
Late appeal deemed constructively filed on time, In re Santos (D5 Jun. 6, 2024 No. F087859) [nonpub. opn.] (Tim’s writeup)
Keeton v. Tesla, Inc.: arb-killer late-fee penalty NOT preempted by FAA
Legislature v. Weber: Tax initiative held invalid because too broad
Loeber v. Lakeside Joint School District* Tax initiative held invalid because too narrow

Read the full article here: https://bit.ly/4dsSvL4

政治・政府経済学

続きを読む一部表示