In this episode, we discuss how overseas investors can protect their investments through the use of investment treaties. We explore the importance of treaty protection in the face of increasing political and regulatory risks, and explain the substantive protections and dispute resolution mechanisms which investment treaties afford.

在本集播客节目中，我们讨论境外投资者如何通过投资协定来保护他们的投资。我们探讨在政治和监管风险日益增加的情况下，投资协定保护的重要性，并解释了投资条约提供的实质性保护和争端解决机制。

Speakers: Ye Weina (Partner, Herbert Smith Freehills Kewei Joint Operation), Gerald Leong (Senior Associate, International Arbitration, London), Nicole Jiang (Associate, Herbert Smith Freehills Kewei Joint Operation)

主讲人：叶微娜 (合伙人, 科伟史密夫斐尔联营办公室), Gerald 梁伟强 （伦敦办公室国际仲裁部资深律师），江晨艺 （科伟史密夫斐尔联营办公室律师）

Tony Damian and Andrew Rich discuss the proposed new ACCC merger notification thresholds with competition partner, Patrick Gay.

Under the so-called identification doctrine, companies could previously only be held criminally liable for a criminal offence requiring a particular mental state (e.g. knowledge, dishonesty etc.) if the mental state of a person representing the company's "directing mind and will" could be attributed to the company. In response to suggestions that the doctrine did not adequately deal with the realities of corporate structures, making it disproportionately difficult to prosecute large organisations for wrongdoing committed by their employees, Parliament enacted the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA 2023), which introduced a new statutory route to attributing criminal liability to a corporate. Under new provisions which came into force in December 2023, a corporate can be liable where a ‘senior manager’, acting with their actual or apparent authority, commits a listed economic crime offence. In this episode, Elizabeth Head, Eamon McCarthy-Keen, and Jessica Chappatte discuss the background to the reforms, the new provisions of the ECCTA 2023, and the implications for businesses of this expanded route to corporate criminal liability.

You can also read our briefing on this topic, which is available on our blog.

In episode 26, Emma and Rebekah are joined by Sarah Henkes-Younger to talk about whether IP rights subsist in material created by generated AI and discuss the famous Thaler patent litigation brought in numerous jurisdictions.

C&I Disputes Partners Dan Dragovic and Michael Lake discuss the much-anticipated decision in Tesseract International Pty Ltd v Pascale Construction Pty Ltd [2024] HCA 24 where the High Court of Australia confirms proportionate liability regimes can be applied in arbitration.

Join Dan and Michael as they discuss the decision and its practical implications.

In this not-to-be-missed episode of Inside IR, Partner Nick Ogilvie and Senior Associate Victoria Fijalski join Rohan Doyle to explore the learnings that can be taken from employers’ early experiences with the new intractable bargaining regime. Join Nick, Vic and Rohan as they:

• recap on what the intractable bargaining regime is, and provide a refresher on the preconditions that need to be met for the Fair Work Commission to make an intractable bargaining declaration;
• review the case law within the intractable bargaining jurisdiction to date, and identify the 5 key traps for employers – mistakes that, if made, are going to lead to poor bargaining outcomes – and tips for how to avoid them; and
• answer the burning question – is there any upside in the intractable bargaining regime for employers?