Dave Rich discusses the duties of elders within the Kootenai Community Church. He emphasizes the importance of protecting the church from false teaching and sin, teaching, leading, and caring for the flock. He outlines the responsibilities of church members towards their elders, including development and support, assessment and reassessment, honor and support, protection, reproof and discipline, and submission. Rich highlights the biblical qualifications for elders and the need for elders to be tested and supported within the congregation. He also stresses the importance of protecting elders from false accusations and dealing with sinning elders through public rebuke and removal. The session concludes with a call for church members to fulfill their duties and responsibilities towards their elders, emphasizing the need for submission and encouragement.

Dave Rich continues his series on Christian ethics, focusing on the qualifications of elders in the local church. He discusses the qualifications of not being addicted to wine, not being pugnacious, being considerate and gentle, leading a household well, having a good reputation, being righteous, being holy, and being self-controlled. Rich emphasizes that these qualifications are not just suggestions but necessary for elders. He also mentions that some qualifications, like being a new convert, are not ethical obligations but qualifications. The lesson concludes with a reminder that these qualifications are necessary for elders and that if a man is not qualified, it is important to speak up. The session ends with a prayer, thanking God for his word and protecting his body, and asking for honor on Lord's Day in worship and in all who claim his name.

In the fifth lesson of the Christian ethics series, Dave Rich discussed the biblical qualifications for elders in the local church, emphasizing the importance of a plurality of elders. He reviewed two passages, 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1, which provide lists of qualifications for elders. Rich highlighted that elders must be above reproach, have a good reputation, be a one-woman man, be temperate, sensible, hospitable, and able to teach. He also explained that these qualifications serve as virtues for all Christians, not just elders, and are essential for maintaining the credibility and effectiveness of the church. The lesson concluded with a prayer for the church to uphold these qualifications and be vigilant in their selection of leaders.

Michael Anderson tackles one of the more uncomfortable passages in Paul's letters this week, walking through 1 Timothy 6:1 and 2 on the behavior expected of believing slaves. He opens by explaining why he deliberately read the ESV's softened word bondservant instead of the Greek doulos, slave, and why understanding that word matters before applying the passage today.

Anderson lays out the historical picture first: slavery in the Roman world looked very different from American chattel slavery, and even Mosaic law regulated rather than forbade the practice. From there he explains why Paul addresses slaves directly in this letter without also addressing masters, tying it to Paul's concern that the gospel's message of equality before God not be twisted into a demand for social revolution.

The heart of the message applies these instructions to modern employment. Anderson identifies two ways a bad attitude toward employers can cause the gospel to be reviled, from the influence of Marxist thought on modern liberation theology to the simple, practical witness of how a Christian actually works. He then unpacks five specific behaviors from Colossians 3 and Ephesians 6 through which believers adorn the gospel through their work, and closes by examining the added responsibility of serving a believing employer well.

Anyone who has ever wondered how to think biblically about their job will find real, practical direction here.

In Lesson 42 of Christian Ethics and the Old Testament, Dave Rich turns from the duties children owe their parents to the duties parents owe their children. He lays out five dimensions of parental duty: love, provision, instruction, modeling, and discipline.

Rich shows that Scripture assumes parents will love their children as a gracious gift from God, and he traces how that love shows up in providing for a child's intellectual, physical, spiritual, and social growth, not just their material needs. He works through the biblical case for instructing children in the Lord and walks through the arguments for public school, Christian school, and homeschooling, weighing each against the parent's God given responsibility for a child's education.

The lesson also covers modeling godliness for children who will imitate their parents whether they intend it or not, and it closes with a careful look at discipline. Rich explains what the rod refers to in Proverbs, why discipline must be free from anger, and how correcting a child's behavior becomes an opportunity to teach them the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Parents raising children in a Christian home will find a clear, biblical framework for thinking through everyday decisions about love, provision, teaching, and correction.

Dave Rich turns to the fifth commandment in Lesson 41 of Christian Ethics and the Old Testament, examining what it means to honor father and mother in Exodus 20:12 and Deuteronomy 5:16. He traces the Hebrew word kavod back to its root meaning of weight and substance, showing why honor calls for treating parents as significant rather than dismissing them.

Using John Calvin's framework, Rich breaks honor into three parts: reverence, obedience, and gratitude. He distinguishes between honoring parents, a lifelong obligation for every child, and obeying parents, which applies most directly to children still living at home. From there he addresses gratitude in concrete terms, including the biblical case for adult children providing financially for aging parents and respecting parental property, drawn from the parable of the prodigal son.

Rich also considers the promise attached to the commandment, weighing its original corporate meaning for Israel against its application today, and closes with the limits of parental authority. Since parents hold derived authority under God, children are never required to obey a command to sin.

Listeners walk away with a clearer framework for honoring parents at every stage of life, along with practical direction for navigating difficult family relationships with biblical wisdom.

Do Christians have to take one day off a week, or don't they? Lesson 40 wraps up the fourth commandment series by laying out the two major Christian views on Sabbath observance.

Teacher Dave Rich presents Sabbatarianism and non-Sabbatarianism as summarized by Wayne Grudem, tracing Sabbatarianism through the Westminster Confession's strict rest and worship requirements, and non-Sabbatarianism through Luther and Calvin, both of whom saw the fourth commandment as fulfilled in Christ rather than binding in its Old Testament form. Rich frames the debate around three questions, whether Sabbath rest is a creation ordinance built into Genesis 2, whether the law of Moses still legally binds Christians, and whether New Testament silence on the Sabbath means it was repealed or simply never repeated.

Rich lands on the non-Sabbatarian side, arguing the Sabbath was not a creation ordinance and was specifically addressed and set aside in the New Testament, while noting how much common ground the two views actually share in practice, worship, rest, and works of mercy. He closes with a lighter look at how Christian liberty applies to holidays like Easter, Christmas, Independence Day, Halloween, and even birthdays.

This lesson gives listeners a clear framework for thinking through a commandment that divides sincere, careful readers of Scripture.

Why is the fourth commandment the only one of the Ten never repeated in the New Testament? Lesson 39 argues that its complete fulfillment in Christ is exactly the reason.

Teacher Dave Rich works through the key apostolic passages on the Sabbath, the Jerusalem Council's silence on Sabbath keeping in Acts 15, Paul's treatment of the observance of days as a disputable matter in Romans 14, and his warnings in Galatians 4 and Colossians 2 that observing special days can become a dangerous return to law rather than grace. Taken together, Rich argues, the New Testament epistles do not support treating Sabbath observance as binding on Christians.

Rich then turns to Hebrews 3 and 4, showing that the rest God offers is ultimately rest from working for salvation and resting instead in Christ's finished work, which is why the fourth commandment alone goes unrepeated, its symbol is fulfilled. From there he traces the New Testament evidence for why the church shifted its regular gathering from the Sabbath to the first day of the week, Christ's resurrection, the early church's practice in Acts and Corinthians, and John's reference to the Lord's day in Revelation.

The lesson closes on a point every view agrees on, whatever day is chosen, Christians remain obligated to gather regularly for worship.