Send us a text

Mishandling anything to do with emotional support pets can have huge financial consequences. The Rutherford, a New York City co-op, recently learned that the hard way when a resident's noisy emotional support birds caused neighbor complaints. The board acted improperly and Attorney William McCracken, partner at Moritt Hock & Hamroff, breaks down what happened, how the board could have avoided this costly mistake, and the lessons to be learned. Habitat's Carol Ott conducts the interview.

The business of running a building is demanding work that requires making endless decisions — some that can quickly lead your board into a quagmire of legal difficulties. Legal Talk interviews New York's leading co-op/condo attorneys to find solutions, and get some guidance, on these challenges. For more co-op and condo insights, sign up to receive Habitat's free newsletters or become a Habitat subscriber today!

Send us a text

One would think it would be easy to add a family member to a co-op stock certificate, but you can’t "just add a name." For boards, it requires careful consideration of multiple factors, including transfer taxes, flip tax implications, and the financial viability of new shareholders. Matthew Goldberg, partner at Hankin & Mazel, explains how boards should evaluate cases where incoming family members lack strong finances, such as recent graduates being added to elderly relatives' shares, and outlines the legal requirements and NYC filings necessary to protect the co-op's interests. Habitat’s Emily Myers conducts the interview.

The business of running a building is demanding work that requires making endless decisions — some that can quickly lead your board into a quagmire of legal difficulties. Legal Talk interviews New York's leading co-op/condo attorneys to find solutions, and get some guidance, on these challenges. For more co-op and condo insights, sign up to receive Habitat's free newsletters or become a Habitat subscriber today!

Send us a text

When a commercial tenant becomes problematic — whether falling behind in rent, not performing repairs or some other infraction of their lease — co-op and condo boards need to act. In this episode Moshe Bobker, partner at Tane Waterman & Wurtzel, explains what the Yellowstone Injunction is and how this critical legal tool can both protect and challenge commercial tenants in NYC buildings. Learn how this Supreme Court proceeding works, when it applies, and most importantly, how boards can strategically use it to their advantage when dealing with problematic commercial tenants.

Key highlights:

• The four essential elements required for a Yellowstone Injunction
• Why timing is crucial: tenants must file before the cure period expires
• Strategic considerations for boards choosing between non-payment proceedings and holdover cases
• Common resolution paths, from early negotiation to full litigation
• Expert tips for boards to maintain leverage in commercial tenant disputes

Whether you're currently facing commercial tenant issues or want to be prepared for future challenges, this episode provides valuable insights for protecting your building's interests. Habitat's Emily Myers conducts the interview.

The business of running a building is demanding work that requires making endless decisions — some that can quickly lead your board into a quagmire of legal difficulties. Legal Talk interviews New York's leading co-op/condo attorneys to find solutions, and get some guidance, on these challenges. For more co-op and condo insights, sign up to receive Habitat's free newsletters or become a Habitat subscriber today!

Send us a text

Serving on your co-op or condo board can be a terrific experience, but it can turn into a personal nightmare if you or your board acts improperly. There are many legal protections, however, and Geoffrey Mazel, partner at Hankin & Mazel, provides an overview of what they are and the precautions you need to take. Habitat’s Emily Myers conducts the interview.

Key Takeaways for Board Directors:

1. Basic Protections
• Board members are protected through multiple layers including NY State statute, case law, and co-op bylaws
• The Business Corporation Law provides indemnification for board members
• The Business Judgment Rule offers protection when acting within authority, in good faith, and following proper procedure

2. When Protection May Not Apply
• Intentional wrongdoing or acts without authority
• No-bid contracts without proper board approval
• Discrimination against protected classes
• Conflicts of interest that aren't properly disclosed
• Actions that violate the proprietary lease

3. Best Practices for Avoiding Liability
• Hold proper board meetings with minutes and formal votes
• Consult legal counsel before making sensitive decisions
• Disclose any conflicts of interest and recuse when necessary
• For purchaser rejections, ensure:
- Full board review and vote (not just committee approval)
- Documentation of legitimate reasons for rejection
- Proper minutes and record-keeping

4. Potential Consequences
• Personal financial liability
• D&O insurance may defend but not indemnify in certain cases
• Punitive damages in discrimination cases aren't covered by insurance

The business of running a building is demanding work that requires making endless decisions — some that can quickly lead your board into a quagmire of legal difficulties. Legal Talk interviews New York's leading co-op/condo attorneys to find solutions, and get some guidance, on these challenges. For more co-op and condo insights, sign up to receive Habitat's free newsletters or become a Habitat subscriber today!

Send us a text

Peter Massa, Partner, Armstrong Teasdale, is interviewed by Habitat Magazine's Bill Morris.

• A legal landmark. The business judgment rule has been around in corporate law for a long time. The theory is that board decisions will not be second-guessed by the courts — provided they’re made in furtherance of the corporation's legitimate interest and in accordance with the recommendation of the corporation’s professionals and the governing documents.
• It’s not failsafe. The caveat here is you generally don't have business judgment rule protection if you're acting in bad faith, outside of the board's authority and against what your governing documents say, or if you’re not following the advice of your professionals.
• Case in point. I represented a condominium that had fireplaces in the apartments. When it was discovered that the chimneys weren't properly lined and fireproofed, engineers told the board it had to get this done because it’s a life-safety issue. The board was facing potential litigation on two fronts — one group didn’t want to spend the money because the fireplaces had never been a problem, and another group threatened to sue if the board did this because it was going to be a big assessment.
• What should the board do. The board should rely on the advice of the engineers. If someone sued, the board’s decision would be upheld because of the business judgment rule. While that case didn't go to litigation, that's how it would be applied. If you can show in court that you were trying to do what was best for the corporation or condominium — even if it was wrong — courts generally will grant you broad leeway.

The business of running a building is demanding work that requires making endless decisions — some that can quickly lead your board into a quagmire of legal difficulties. Legal Talk interviews New York's leading co-op/condo attorneys to find solutions, and get some guidance, on these challenges. For more co-op and condo insights, sign up to receive Habitat's free newsletters or become a Habitat subscriber today!

Send us a text

Leni Morrison Cummins, Partner, Cozen O’Connor, is interviewed by Habitat Magazine's Carol Ott.

It all starts when sponsors decide how they’re going to allocate expenses between the residential and commercial portions of the building. Real Property Law 339M gives sponsors the ability to allocate expenses based on something other than a percentage of common interest. When a sponsor is looking to market their building, they want to keep the allocation of expenses for the commercial units down. So they’ll keep an eye toward minimizing the common expenses.

Expenses go up over the years, but a board doesn’t typically have the authority to change an allocation of expense methodology without commercial unit-owner consent. And if the commercial unit-owner decides it doesn’t want to pay more, fair or not, it can refuse.

Can a true-up fix things? It depends. A true-up is an accounting of the difference between what a board budgets for the year ahead and the actual expenses at the end of that year. The bylaws will determine whether a board can legally true-up. If they say common expenses are allocated and charged based on actual expenses, it can. But if the bylaws simply discuss creating common charges based on a budget, then a true-up isn’t necessary. In practice, though, many condos true-up even if it’s not contained in the bylaws because their accountants direct them to do so.

Just make sure your managing agent understands the prescribed allocation methodology and how it’s applied. If you do see something completely out of whack, approach the commercial unit-owners and see if they will agree to something more reasonable. If not, you’re stuck with what the bylaws say.

The business of running a building is demanding work that requires making endless decisions — some that can quickly lead your board into a quagmire of legal difficulties. Legal Talk interviews New York's leading co-op/condo attorneys to find solutions, and get some guidance, on these challenges. For more co-op and condo insights, sign up to receive Habitat's free newsletters or become a Habitat subscriber today!

Send us a text

Benjamin Flavin, Partner, Braverman Greenspun, is interviewed by Habitat Magazine's Carol Ott.

Lessons for Co-op & Condo Board Directors

• The benefits. HDFC co-ops were created to provide affordable housing for people who may not otherwise be able to enter the New York City real estate market. There are also certain tax benefits that lower the cost of owning an HDFC apartment.
• The regulatory agreement. Most modern HDFCs have a regulatory agreement with New York City that outlines the financial regulations they’re subject to. I think this can be very difficult for boards because sometimes the agreements are not very clear.
• Take flip taxes, for example. These are often determined when the HDFC was created. Many modern HDFCs have a 70/30 flip-tax ratio — 30% of the sale’s profit goes to the HDFC, and 70% goes to the shareholder. But older HDFCs have a 60/40 flip tax, where 40% of the profit goes back to the city, and the shareholder gets 60%. The HDFC is totally left out of the mix.
• Where to locate documents. Many of the documents, like the co-op’s certificate of incorporation, can be obtained from the state. Things like the deed and regulatory agreements are recorded publicly and can be found on ACRIS. And the proprietary lease, bylaws and other such documents can be found in the offering plan in their original form.
• Keep current. One of the most important things for HDFC board members is to understand their co-op’s governing documents. They’ve changed over the years, so if you’ve read something or heard something about HDFCs you should go read your particular documents and find out if whatever you’ve heard applies to your particular co-op.

The business of running a building is demanding work that requires making endless decisions — some that can quickly lead your board into a quagmire of legal difficulties. Legal Talk interviews New York's leading co-op/condo attorneys to find solutions, and get some guidance, on these challenges. For more co-op and condo insights, sign up to receive Habitat's free newsletters or become a Habitat subscriber today!

Send us a text

Lessons for co-op and condo board directors

Evan Richman, Partner, Fleischner Potash is interviewed by Habitat Magazine's Carol Ott.

What happened. In 2021 there was a disputed board election between two slates of candidates at a Port Chester condominium. Right before the election, the board issued a notice to all residents in the building letting them know that this meeting was going to be held virtually. It stipulated a new requirement that in order to vote in the election, each resident or member had to first authorize the email address from which they would be sending their directed proxy. The board provided an email authorization form, which required the member to list their name, unit number and a designated email address from which they would be sending their proxy. Each member had to sign and date it, then send it back to the managing agent.

At the annual meeting. A number of proxies were submitted that had no prior email authorizations. The accountant who was overseeing the election then found that there were not enough authorized votes to constitute a quorum. Since there was no quorum, there could be no election. The board that was already in office continued for another year, and the side that had submitted the proxies challenged the election.

In court. The challengers argued that the email authorization form wasn’t reasonable and shouldn’t be permitted under the new amendments to the business corporation law, which were added during the pandemic. The court, however, said that the board was required to take steps to verify who these individuals were and that the board was required to impose safeguards. It held that this simple email authorization form was indeed a reasonable requirement and was valid under the statute, and the court dismissed the case.

Going forward. This is very significant because it appears to be the first New York case in which a court is interpreting the verification requirement under the newly enacted statutes. As co-op and condo boards now shift from in-person to virtual electronic meetings, they will need to impose some type of reasonable safeguard to eliminate fraud or misrepresentation. If a board decides to ignore this completely, it could open itself up to some type of election challenge, risk or headache down the line.

The business of running a building is demanding work that requires making endless decisions — some that can quickly lead your board into a quagmire of legal difficulties. Legal Talk interviews New York's leading co-op/condo attorneys to find solutions, and get some guidance, on these challenges. For more co-op and condo insights, sign up to receive Habitat's free newsletters or become a Habitat subscriber today!