• The $300,000 Mistake: How Boards Can Avoid a Violation Crisis

  • 2025/02/03
  • 再生時間: 18 分
  • ポッドキャスト

The $300,000 Mistake: How Boards Can Avoid a Violation Crisis

  • サマリー

  • Send us a text

    Navigating building violations can be tricky for co-op and condo boards, especially when it comes to determining responsibility for corrections. In this enlightening discussion with attorney Brandon James of Borah Goldstein, board directors will learn crucial guidelines for managing violations effectively and avoiding costly mistakes. Habitat's Paula Chin conducts the interview.

    James breaks down the fundamental "rule of thumb" - unit owners and shareholders are typically responsible for conditions inside their apartments, while boards handle common area issues. However, there are important exceptions, such as lead paint violations and problems stemming from common area issues like facade leaks causing interior mold.

    Key takeaways:
    • Even when violations are the unit owner's responsibility, notices typically go to the building first - making it critical for boards to promptly notify and follow up with residents responsible for corrections

    • Failing to monitor and address violations can have severe consequences, including massive financial penalties, difficulty refinancing, and damage to the building's reputation - one example cited showed a 25-unit building that accumulated over $300,000 in violation penalties

    • During refinancing, most lenders require buildings to cure outstanding violations within six months of closing, putting boards under pressure to resolve backlogged issues quickly

    • Boards can generally recover violation-related costs from responsible unit owners through indemnification clauses, but this becomes much more difficult if too much time passes between the violation and enforcement

    The episode emphasizes that proactive monitoring and prompt attention to violations, even minor ones, is essential for maintaining both building safety and financial health. Letting violations accumulate can create a snowball effect that impacts everything from property values to residents' quality of life.


    The business of running a building is demanding work that requires making endless decisions — some that can quickly lead your board into a quagmire of legal difficulties. Legal Talk interviews New York's leading co-op/condo attorneys to find solutions, and get some guidance, on these challenges. For more co-op and condo insights, sign up to receive Habitat's free newsletters or become a Habitat subscriber today!

    続きを読む 一部表示

あらすじ・解説

Send us a text

Navigating building violations can be tricky for co-op and condo boards, especially when it comes to determining responsibility for corrections. In this enlightening discussion with attorney Brandon James of Borah Goldstein, board directors will learn crucial guidelines for managing violations effectively and avoiding costly mistakes. Habitat's Paula Chin conducts the interview.

James breaks down the fundamental "rule of thumb" - unit owners and shareholders are typically responsible for conditions inside their apartments, while boards handle common area issues. However, there are important exceptions, such as lead paint violations and problems stemming from common area issues like facade leaks causing interior mold.

Key takeaways:
• Even when violations are the unit owner's responsibility, notices typically go to the building first - making it critical for boards to promptly notify and follow up with residents responsible for corrections

• Failing to monitor and address violations can have severe consequences, including massive financial penalties, difficulty refinancing, and damage to the building's reputation - one example cited showed a 25-unit building that accumulated over $300,000 in violation penalties

• During refinancing, most lenders require buildings to cure outstanding violations within six months of closing, putting boards under pressure to resolve backlogged issues quickly

• Boards can generally recover violation-related costs from responsible unit owners through indemnification clauses, but this becomes much more difficult if too much time passes between the violation and enforcement

The episode emphasizes that proactive monitoring and prompt attention to violations, even minor ones, is essential for maintaining both building safety and financial health. Letting violations accumulate can create a snowball effect that impacts everything from property values to residents' quality of life.


The business of running a building is demanding work that requires making endless decisions — some that can quickly lead your board into a quagmire of legal difficulties. Legal Talk interviews New York's leading co-op/condo attorneys to find solutions, and get some guidance, on these challenges. For more co-op and condo insights, sign up to receive Habitat's free newsletters or become a Habitat subscriber today!

The $300,000 Mistake: How Boards Can Avoid a Violation Crisisに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。