In this episode, I’m joined by Ebrahim Goolamally to examine what happens when housing governance, performance data, and lived experience are placed side by side — and don’t align.
Drawing on Housing Ombudsman statistics, Tenant Satisfaction Measures, and Regulator of Social Housing gradings, we explore a dataset that reveals a persistent and troubling gap: landlords can retain strong governance and viability ratings while residents report poor complaint handling, repeated service failures, and escalating disputes.
The conversation focuses in particular on complaint handling — consistently the weakest satisfaction metric across the sector — and how failures at this stage drive escalation, maladministration findings, and long-term harm for residents. We discuss why high satisfaction scores elsewhere do not prevent serious failings, and what this says about how success is currently measured in social housing.
This is not a discussion about one landlord. It’s about a system that assesses itself in silos — and the consequences when governance frameworks fail to reflect lived reality on modern housing estates.
In this episode we cover:
• What Ombudsman data reveals when viewed alongside satisfaction scores
• Why complaint handling is the sector’s critical fault line
• The disconnect between “good governance” ratings and resident experience
• How scale, process, and performance metrics can obscure accountability
• Why joined-up data matters for trust, transparency, and reform
This episode is essential listening for residents, housing professionals, policymakers, and anyone concerned with accountability in the housing sector.
https://housingservicechargeandrentpiperdy.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ebrahimpi/
#HousingSector #SocialHousing #HousingOmbudsman #ComplaintHandling #LivedExperience #Governance
Support the show