『The Presentations Japan Series』のカバーアート

The Presentations Japan Series

The Presentations Japan Series

著者： Dale Carnegie Training
無料で聴く

Persuasion power is one of the kingpins of business success. We recognise immediately those who have the facility and those who don't. We certainly trust, gravitate toward and follow those with persuasion power. Those who don't have it lack presence and fundamentally disappear from view and become invisible. We have to face the reality, persuasion power is critical for building our careers and businesses. The good thing is we can all master this ability. We can learn how to become persuasive and all we need is the right information, insight and access to the rich experiences of others. If you want to lead or sell then you must have this capability. This is a fact from which there is no escape and there are no excuses.Copyright 2022 マネジメント マネジメント・リーダーシップ 経済学
エピソード
  • Why Are You Such A Boring Presenter

    Why Are You Such A Boring Presenter
    2026/10/26
    Think you are not a boring presenter? You may be right, but think about the business presentations you can actually remember. Most professionals struggle to name even a handful. The problem is rarely a shortage of information. It is the mistaken belief that good content will somehow deliver itself. Why are so many business presentations boring? Business presentations become boring when speakers rely on strong content but neglect the way they deliver it. Once, executives could impress an audience simply by bringing information nobody else possessed. Search engines changed that bargain. Facts, charts and industry commentary are now readily available, so a presenter must do more than recite them. A business leader who reads slides in a flat voice asks the audience to work harder than necessary. The same trap catches salespeople, technical specialists and senior managers: expertise does not automatically create engagement. In a boardroom, an internal briefing or a client pitch, listeners need to understand why the information matters and feel that the speaker believes it matters too. Excellent material delivered badly can still disappear without a trace. Do now: Audit your next talk for moments where the delivery adds nothing to the content. Why is it harder to hold an audience's attention today? The smartphone puts a powerful alternative to your presentation within arm's reach of every listener. Steve Jobs introduced the iPhone in 2007, and the competition for attention has only intensified since. A bored listener no longer has to stare at the ceiling. Email, messaging, TikTok and an endless stream of online content offer immediate escape. This affects presentations in Japan as much as those in Australia, Europe or the United States. Even a polished executive cannot assume that the audience will stay focused simply out of courtesy. We are competing with a device designed to offer novelty on demand. The answer is not to cram more detail onto slides. We need to make the live experience worth watching, with purposeful changes of pace, vocal energy and a message that matters. Do now: Plan an attention reset before your audience has a reason to reach for a phone. What did Albert Mehrabian actually discover about communication? Albert Mehrabian's famous 55–38–7 figures do not mean that words account for only 7% of every presentation. His 1960s research concerned how people interpret feelings and attitudes when verbal and non-verbal signals conflict. The percentages are regularly stretched into a universal rule about speaking, appearance and voice. That is a misuse of the findings. Imagine a company president announcing excellent results in a monotone, with a wooden face and no expressive movement. The words signal enthusiasm, but the delivery signals the opposite. That mismatch can make the audience doubt the message or lose interest. The practical lesson is congruence: align your voice, expression and gestures with what you are actually saying. The research is not an excuse to dismiss content; it is a reminder that delivery can undermine it. Do now: Check whether your tone and body language match the emotion and importance of each key point. How can voice modulation stop a presentation sounding monotonous? Varying volume, pace and emphasis makes key ideas easier to notice and remember. A monotone flattens every sentence into the same level of importance. Instead, give significant words more power, then occasionally soften your voice almost to a conspiratorial whisper. That contrast makes listeners lean in. Pauses also matter. A short silence after an important statement gives people time to process it and signals that something deserves attention. Do not shout your way through an entire speech or slow every sentence into a dramatic performance. Variety works because the audience hears a meaningful change. In a sales presentation, a quieter explanation of the client's risk can carry more weight than a loud declaration about product features. In a leadership briefing, a firm, clear statement can underline the decision everyone needs to understand. Do now: Mark three phrases for emphasis and two deliberate pauses in your next script. How do gestures and eye contact improve executive presentations? Purposeful gestures and direct eye contact reinforce your words and make the audience feel personally addressed. Gestures should dramatise the point, not provide random movement. A broad gesture may underline an opportunity; a smaller, controlled movement may suit a serious warning. Coordinate the movement with the exact phrase you want remembered. Eye contact adds another layer. Rather than sweeping your gaze vaguely across the room, look directly at individual listeners long enough to complete a thought, then move naturally to someone else. That approach works in a client meeting, a management presentation or a conference speech, although cultural expectations and room size will shape how you apply it. In Japan, ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    13 分
  • Four Strategies For Building Confidence As A Speaker

    Four Strategies For Building Confidence As A Speaker
    2026/10/19
    Confidence in public speaking is not created by telling a nervous presenter to "be confident". Fear and nerves are real, and when speakers become consumed by their own stress, their attention shifts away from the audience. Confidence has to be built deliberately. Four practical building blocks help: self-acceptance, self-respect, taking manageable risks and using evidence-based self-talk. How can self-acceptance reduce presentation anxiety? Accept that nerves are a normal physical response rather than evidence that you cannot present successfully.Stress triggers reactions such as adrenaline because the body is preparing for perceived danger, and fighting that reality only creates additional pressure. We also create anxiety by setting the performance bar unrealistically high. If the internal requirement is to be perfect, almost any presentation becomes threatening. A better approach is to treat presenting as a journey. Decide that today you will improve three specific things rather than demanding flawless performance. That recalibration reduces pressure and gives you achievable targets for progress. Mini-summary: Accept the nerves and lower the demand for perfection. Focus on a few specific improvements each time you speak. How does self-respect build confidence as a speaker? Use your existing record of achievement as evidence that you can develop presentation skills too. Skilled speakers were not born delivering polished presentations; they built their capability over time. When we watch an accomplished professional, we see the finished capability but not the awkward early attempts that preceded it. The same applies to public speaking. Look back at skills you have already developed in your career and life. You were not complete at the beginning of those journeys either. Moving your mindset from perceived lack to demonstrated capability gives you a more realistic foundation for confidence. Mini-summary: Remember what you have already learned to do well. Your history of achievement is evidence that presentation capability can also be developed. Why do speakers need to take risks to improve? Growth requires changing something, and any meaningful change carries some risk. Repeating exactly the same presentation behaviours will usually reproduce exactly the same results. The change does not have to be dramatic. You might tweak something you already do or introduce one new technique. Start with a small risk, try it in a presentation, analyse what happened and adjust before the next speaking opportunity. Repeating this cycle steadily expands your repertoire and makes previously uncomfortable techniques feel normal. Mini-summary: Take small, deliberate presentation risks. Test, review and adjust until your range of speaking skills expands. What kind of presentation risks should beginners take? Choose risks small enough to be manageable but meaningful enough to stretch your current ability. Confidence grows through successful experimentation rather than through one enormous leap outside your comfort zone. A speaker might try stronger eye contact, a more powerful opening, greater vocal variety, a deliberate pause or a more expressive gesture. The particular technique matters less than the process: select one change, practise it, use it, evaluate the result and refine it. As each small risk becomes familiar, the next challenge becomes easier to attempt. Mini-summary: Stretch rather than overwhelm yourself. Small experiments accumulate into a much larger range of presentation possibilities. How can self-talk improve public-speaking confidence? Replace unsupported "I can't" thinking with constructive language backed by evidence. Simply repeating "I can" is weak unless you can tell yourself why that statement is credible. For example, "Because I have done the preparation, I can do it" gives your mind evidence. So does, "Because I have done this successfully on a smaller scale, I can build on that experience this time." The content we repeatedly feed our minds matters, including our own internal commentary. Negative self-talk magnifies fear; evidence-based self-talk directs attention toward preparation, capability and progress. Mini-summary: Do not merely tell yourself you can succeed. Give your brain concrete evidence from preparation and previous achievement. Can anyone become a more confident presenter? Confidence is not a fixed personality trait; it varies by situation and can be deliberately developed. Someone may be extremely confident in one area of life and frightened in another, including public speaking. That makes presentation confidence a project rather than a prerequisite. Self-acceptance helps normalise nerves. Self-respect reminds us that we have developed difficult capabilities before. Small risks expand our repertoire, while constructive self-talk gives us evidence that progress is possible. Together, these four tools shift the focus away from fear and toward the audience and the job we are there ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    11 分
  • Should We Argue The Point With Our Audience

    Should We Argue The Point With Our Audience
    2026/10/12
    Public speaking has become more complicated in an era of short attention spans, scepticism and strongly held views. Even a conventional business presentation can wander into sensitive territory, and the Q&A is where disagreement can become personal. The speaker's job is not to win a public argument. It is to remain professional, control the room and protect both the message and the personal and professional brand. Should a speaker argue with a hostile audience member? No. A speaker should answer the issue but avoid turning the Q&A into a public verbal brawl. Once an exchange becomes a contest over who can win the argument, the presenter risks surrendering professionalism and control of the room. Audiences can arrive with strongly held expectations about business, society and corporate behaviour. Topics such as diversity, equity and inclusion, plastic waste, climate change, cybersecurity and privacy can trigger views that extend far beyond the narrow subject of a presentation. A speaker may think the material is harmless and discover otherwise when questions begin. The crucial mindset is to expect disagreement without treating disagreement as an invitation to combat. Mini-summary: Answer the issue, not the aggression. Your objective is to manage the room professionally, not defeat an antagonist in public. Why is the Q&A the highest-risk part of a business presentation? The Q&A removes much of the speaker's control because audience members can raise hostile, unrelated or highly charged issues. The prepared presentation has a structure; question time can go anywhere. In most business settings, audiences will allow the speaker to deliver the formal talk without interruption. The dynamics change once questions are invited. Someone can be rude, arrogant, bullying, condescending or aggressive, and the speaker has to deal with the behaviour in real time. That makes mental preparation as important as subject knowledge. Before taking the stage, consider the controversial areas surrounding the topic, anticipate difficult questions and decide how you will respond without becoming defensive. Mini-summary: Treat Q&A as a separate presentation skill. Prepare for difficult questions before you enter the room rather than improvising under pressure. How can a speaker control the time during a hostile Q&A? Set a clear time limit for questions before the Q&A begins so you retain a legitimate and dignified way to close the session. This simple piece of framing gives the presenter an important control mechanism if the discussion deteriorates. If questions become increasingly hostile, the speaker can refer back to the allotted time and say that the session has reached its scheduled conclusion before moving to prepared closing remarks. This is far better than abruptly terminating an exchange because you appear unable to handle it. The time boundary was established in advance, so using it feels natural rather than evasive. It also allows you to reclaim the final impression instead of letting an antagonist's question become the last thing the audience remembers. Mini-summary: Define the Q&A window in advance. A pre-set time boundary gives you a professional exit route and helps you retain control of the close. How should you repeat or paraphrase an aggressive question? Repeat normal questions for the audience, but paraphrase hostile questions to remove their emotional charge before answering. Do not amplify an attack by broadcasting the attacker's exact language to the whole room. For example, if someone asks, 'Isn't it true that you are going to fire 30% of the workforce in the next few weeks?', the speaker can reframe it as, 'The question was about staffing.' The underlying issue still has to be answered, but the inflammatory wording has been stripped away. This lowers the temperature and allows the presenter to appear cool, calm and collected. Paraphrasing is not a licence to dodge the substance; it is a technique for separating the legitimate question from the hostile packaging around it. Mini-summary: Neutralise the language, then answer the substance. Paraphrasing helps reduce tension without avoiding the issue. How do you stop a hostile questioner from taking over the Q&A? Give your answer and move immediately to another audience member rather than inviting the antagonist to continue the argument. Asking whether your answer satisfied them can simply reopen the fight. After answering, transition with a clear 'Who has the next question?' If the same person interrupts again and insists on continuing the dispute, acknowledge that they hold strong views and offer to continue the discussion after the presentation rather than consuming everyone else's time. Then move straight back to the room and invite the next question. This prevents one individual from monopolising the event while showing the rest of the audience that you are willing to engage without allowing the session to be hijacked. Mini-summary: Answer, transition ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    14 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません