Thinking LSAT

著者: Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
  • サマリー

  • Ben Olson and Nathan Fox started the Thinking LSAT Podcast to become better LSAT teachers and have some fun. Please 1) subscribe, 2) rate and review, and 3) send us questions: help@thinkinglsat.com. Don't pay for law school! Learn more at lsatdemon.com
    Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
    続きを読む 一部表示

あらすじ・解説

Ben Olson and Nathan Fox started the Thinking LSAT Podcast to become better LSAT teachers and have some fun. Please 1) subscribe, 2) rate and review, and 3) send us questions: help@thinkinglsat.com. Don't pay for law school! Learn more at lsatdemon.com
Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
エピソード
  • Pre-Law Predators (Ep. 488)
    2025/01/06

    Can you trust your pre-law advisor? Not if you’re an undergraduate student at the University of Kansas. This week Ben and Nathan criticize a school that’s notorious for misleading pre-law students about their law-school prospects. The guys also share simple tactics for ignoring the clock on the LSAT, and they calm a listener who’s frustrated by their progress in Reading Comprehension.


    Study with our Free Plan

    Download our iOS app

    Watch Episode 488 on YouTube


    1:28 - Fighting Bad Habits - Ben and Nathan share some tips for regaining your composure when you catch yourself rushing on timed practice. Here’s a simple one: breathe.

    7:37 - RC Blues - Listener De’Andre wants to improve faster in Reading Comprehension. Nathan and Ben instruct De’Andre to stop looking for shortcuts and to work on understanding one sentence at a time.

    17:24 - What’s the Deal with…? - The guys pass judgment on the University of Kansas School of Law, which uses predatory admissions practices against its own undergraduate students.

    1:06:09 - 3+3 Program - An anonymous listener declines some unhelpful guidance from their prelaw advisor.

    1:12:22 - Word of the Week - We accept as an axiom that the LSAT makes perfect sense.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 17 分
  • Can Retaking Hurt You? (Ep. 487)
    2024/12/30

    Do law schools look unfavorably at applicants who retake the LSAT? This week, Ben and Nathan insist that any downsides to retaking the LSAT are negligible, while the upsides can be life-changing. The guys also dispel the myth of “overthinking,” rail against obscurantist 509 reports, and probe Ben’s alma mater: George Washington Law.


    Study with our Free Plan

    Download our iOS app

    Watch Episode 487 on YouTube


    3:49 - Law School Exams - A long-time listener describes how studying LSAT Logic Games helped prepare them for law school exams.

    13:30 - T14 Scholarships - The guys discuss a T14 law school’s deceptive messaging about scholarships.

    21:59 - Overthinking - LSAT students often blame their mistakes on “overthinking.” But you’re far more likely to miss a question because you didn’t think about it enough.

    32:21 - Ask Button - Nathan and Ben celebrate the LSAT Demon Ask Button team.

    34:47 - Retaking with a High Score - Ben and Nathan revisit a recent discussion about the potential downsides of retaking the LSAT when you already have a high score. The guys maintain that there’s only upside to retaking.

    56:03 - What’s the Deal with…? - Nathan and Ben look into George Washington University School of Law, a regional law school in Washington, D.C.

    1:29:52 - Word of the Week - We offer this podcast for your delectation.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 33 分
  • New Law School Admissions Data (Ep. 486)
    2024/12/23

    Nathan and Ben dig into newly released admissions data and discuss the impact of the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ban. Later, the guys advocate greater transparency in law school pricing, assess JD-Next as an alternative to the LSAT, and investigate the ascendent Texas A&M School of Law.


    Study with our Free Plan

    Download our iOS app

    Watch Episode 486 on YouTube


    4:25 - New Law School Enrollment Data - The ABA just released law schools’ Standard 509 disclosures for 2024. Ben and Nathan discuss what the numbers mean for URM admissions following the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ban.

    14:55 - Scholarships - ABA 509 reports now define full-tuition scholarships as “scholarships that cover tuition and mandatory fees.” Listener Emma wonders if this definition allows law schools to obscure their scholarship numbers. Nathan and Ben consider solutions to law schools’ discriminatory pricing model.

    31:20 - JD-Next - Some law schools now report the number of enrolled students who took JD-Next, an alternative law school admissions test. So far, those numbers are low.

    34:30 - What’s the Deal with…? - Ben and Nathan look into Texas A&M University School of Law, which has rocketed up the US News rankings in recent years.

    1:16:56 - Read Every Answer - The guys explain why you should read every answer on every LSAT question.

    1:21:57 - Word of the Week - Thinking LSAT listeners should avail themselves of LSAT Demon’s free classes at lsatdemon.com/free.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 24 分

Thinking LSATに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。