Welcome to Ubuntu Institute of Ideas, where we dissect Africa's role in shaping global power structures. Today, we’re tackling a burning issue: Africa's call for two permanent seats on the UN Security Council (UNSC). This is more than a debate about seats at a table—it’s a fight for justice, representation, and a voice in the decisions that shape our world.

The Case for Change

The current UNSC structure is a relic from the post-World War II era, stuck in a geopolitical time warp. How can a continent with 54 nations, home to over a billion people and at the epicentre of global security challenges, remain voiceless in the council's permanent membership? Africa’s absence is a glaring gap in a body claiming to represent global interests. It undermines the council’s legitimacy, making its decisions seem biased and disconnected from the realities of today’s interconnected world. Advocates argue that granting permanent seats to Africa would right a historical wrong and inject fresh perspectives into addressing security challenges. With the upcoming Summit of the Future, this debate isn’t just theoretical—it’s an opportunity to rewrite history.

Points of Tension

But, as with all change, there’s resistance. Should Africa’s permanent members have veto power? The U.S. supports the idea of seats but draws the line at the veto, leaving many Africans asking: Is this real reform, or just lip service? Then there’s the tricky question of who represents Africa. Will rivalries between nations slow down progress? Some argue the problem is bigger than just representation. Critics are calling for a complete overhaul of the UNSC—abolishing vetoes, democratizing the council, or even rethinking its very existence. And let’s not ignore the whispers: Is the West’s sudden push for reform a strategic play to curb China and Russia’s growing influence in Africa?

Why This Matters

Africa’s demand for UNSC reform isn’t just about politics—it’s about reclaiming agency. The stakes are high, and the world is watching. Will this be a moment of transformation, or just another chapter of empty promises? Join us as we unpack the complexities, break down the power dynamics, and explore what this means for Africa and the world. This is Ubuntu Institute of Ideas—because Africa’s story is global, and it’s time the world started listening.

Considering Cameroon’s colonial history and France’s enduring influence through mechanisms like the CFA franc, can the country ever achieve genuine economic independence without severing ties to these neo-colonial structures? The question isn’t just about economics—it’s about reclaiming agency in a system designed to perpetuate dependence. What would a bold break look like, and what risks or rewards might it bring?

At 91 years old, President Paul Biya’s decades-long rule has shaped Cameroon’s trajectory, often through silencing dissent and eliminating rivals. As his era draws to a close, the nation faces an uncertain future. Can Cameroon navigate a peaceful and democratic transition of power, or is it teetering on the edge of instability in the absence of a clear succession plan?

The Anglophone crisis continues to fester, exposing deep-seated grievances among those who feel excluded from Cameroon’s political and economic systems. What will it take to address this historic marginalization and foster reconciliation in a nation where unity often feels like an elusive dream?

Beyond politics, Cameroon’s ethnic and linguistic divides have fuelled decades of conflict and stalled national progress. How can the country transcend these divisions to build a cohesive identity—one that embraces its diversity while working toward a shared vision of prosperity?

And finally, as Africa increasingly pushes back against French influence, Cameroon finds itself at a crossroads in its foreign policy. Can it assert a more independent stance without severing ties to a former colonial power that still wields significant economic and geopolitical leverage?

These are the hard questions that Cameroon must confront, and their answers will determine not just the nation’s trajectory, but its ability to define its own future in a rapidly shifting global landscape.

This podcast episode examines the evolving global landscape and Africa's increasing role in challenging Western dominance.

Tune in to learn about: The BRICS bloc's expansion and its appeal to nations seeking an alternative to the Western-led global order. Why countries are attracted to BRICS' principles of mutual respect, understanding, equality, solidarity, openness, inclusiveness, and consensus. How countries are pushing back against the United States' economic dominance and its use of sanctions and financial pressure to enforce its directives. The significance of African nations rejecting Western influence and partnering with Russia and China. Examples of how African nations are taking control of their resources and economies, such as Ghana's mandate for local gold processing and Gabon's domestic timber processing policies. The implications of Trump's return to power and the potential impact on US aid, trade, and climate agreements with African nations. How the concept of "exporting sovereignty" plays a role in Russia's engagement with African nations, empowering them to achieve greater independence. The debate surrounding permanent African representation on the UN Security Council and the potential candidates.

Challenge yourself to think critically about: The implications of a multipolar world order and the decline of Western hegemony. The opportunities and challenges presented by new alliances and partnerships. The role of natural resources and economic development in shaping global power dynamics.

Don't miss this thought-provoking podcast that examines the complex interplay of geopolitics, economics, and cultural identity in a rapidly changing.

Africans are appalled by South Africa's treatment of Chidimma Adetshina, Miss Universe Africa and Oceania, and her family. It argues that the legal investigation into her family's residency status contradicts South Africa's history of pan-African solidarity during the apartheid struggle and exposes lingering colonial biases. The piece highlights the hypocrisy of South Africa rejecting a fellow African while celebrating a representative with European ancestry. The author calls for an end to the investigation, a formal apology, and a broader commitment to pan-African unity, urging South Africa to honour Nelson Mandela's legacy of inclusivity. The article concludes by emphasising the importance of African unity and the need for South Africa to act decisively.

Who Is South African? The YouTube video "SOUTH AFRICA'S SHAME" by Kilimanjaro News Network ignites a provocative discussion on identity, inclusivity, and Pan-Africanism through the lens of the controversy surrounding Chidimma Adinma. Adinma, a Nigerian-born South African, was barred from representing South Africa in the Miss Universe pageant due to her Nigerian heritage. This decision has sparked outrage and accusations of xenophobia, raising critical questions about what it truly means to be South African.

The video critiques this exclusion as a betrayal of Pan-African ideals, pointing to the irony of South Africa—once a beneficiary of continental solidarity during apartheid—now marginalising its fellow Africans. It frames this incident as emblematic of larger issues: entrenched colonial-era prejudices, rising xenophobia, and the struggle for an inclusive national identity.

Kilimanjaro News Network challenges South Africa to reconcile its policies with its history and honour Nelson Mandela’s vision of unity. By using Chidimma’s case as a microcosm, the video calls for an urgent re-evaluation of how African nations treat each other’s citizens. It asks: Can South Africa truly embrace the diversity of its population while holding onto exclusionary notions of identity?

This debate is a critical opportunity to explore the intersections of nationalism, post-colonial identity, and Pan-African unity. Should nationality be based solely on birthplace or heritage, or is it defined by shared values and contributions to a nation? Furthermore, what does Chidimma’s story reveal about the challenges of building inclusive African nations in a post-apartheid, globalised world?

The discussion urges us to examine whether South Africa can transcend these divisions and embrace a broader, more inclusive understanding of African identity. Is it time to redefine "South African" to reflect the nation’s diverse reality and its Pan-African responsibilities?