検索キーワード： 歴史学

私たちは、どれだけ世界のことを理解しているのか。ロシアのウクライナ侵攻、イギリスのEU離脱など、大勢の人が予測を外す出来事が続いている。尊敬するピョートル大帝を手本に領土拡大を目指すプーチン大統領。

「ヒストリーの語源は、ストーリーと同じである」。時代、地域ごとに語り部が入れ替わり、古今東西の歴史をひもといていく。

「ナチスは良いこともした」という言説は，国内外で定期的に議論の的になり続けている．アウトバーンを建設した，失業率を低下させた，福祉政策を行った――

なぜ解決できないのか？難問の構造を歴史から読み解く１５講。この一冊で中東問題のすべてがわかる！

2億150万年前（三畳紀末期）の地球で、陸も海も関係なく、80％もの生物種が一斉に消えた。世界中の地層に記録されたその大事件を「三畳紀末大量絶滅」という。このとき、いったい何が起きたのか？

バーフバリ、FGO、女神転生、3×3eyes…など映画、アニメ、ゲームの原点がここに！ファンタジーを楽しむようにすらすら読めて一気にわかる！

教員七年目，松本サリン事件の現場から近い県下屈指の名門高に転勤した著者が生徒たちと模索した教育実践，歴史総合の授業を充実させるための作戦（方法）を経て…

現在につながる重要な対立を厳選してやさしく解説！ロシアのウクライナへの軍事侵攻、パレスチナの紛争など、世界ではまだ争いが絶えません。そこには、宗教、資源、領土、思想、民族などさまざまな要因があり、各国の国際関係が複雑に絡み合っています。

人間味あふれる神々は、恋をし、戦い、ときに騙す『エッダ』『サガ』として、今に伝えられる神話への「いちばんわかりやすい」入門書！

★話題沸騰！ 発売即、大重版！★「ビッグバンからAI時代」まで138億年を一気読み！★さらに、「現代から宇宙の終わり」まで未来の予測可能なシナリオも！★17か国で続々刊行、世界的ベストセラー！

Bloodlands is a new kind of European history, presenting the mass murders committed by the Nazi and Stalinist regimes as two aspects of a single history, in the time and place where they occurred: between Germany and Russia, when Hitler and Stalin both held power. Assiduously researched, deeply humane, and utterly definitive, Bloodlands will be required listening for anyone seeking to understand the central tragedy of modern history.

“History”, suggests Robert Gildea, “is a battlefield.” Questions of power, rights, identity and nationhood always have an ancient and modern historical dimension and countries still go to war over their interpretation of history. Yet accounts of history are just as prone to fabrication as fake news, so how can we tell good history from bad? In this passionately argued book, Gildea suggests that the more people who really understand what good history entails, the more likely history is to triumph over myth.

This book is the culmination of more than three decades of meticulous historiographic research on Nazi Germany by one of the period’s most distinguished historians. The volume brings together the most important and influential aspects of Ian Kershaw’s research on the Holocaust for the first time. The writings are arranged in three sections - Hitler and the Final Solution, popular opinion and the Jews in Nazi Germany, and the Final Solution in historiography - and Kershaw provides an introduction and a closing section on the uniqueness of Nazism.

「ヒストリーの語源は、ストーリーと同じである」。時代、地域ごとに語り部が入れ替わり、古今東西の歴史をひもといていく。

近年、モンゴル帝国に関する研究が文献、考古学ともに長足の進歩を遂げ、従来の「野蛮、残虐」といったイメージは大きく修正が迫られています。

There are many stories we can tell about the past, and we are not, perhaps, as free as we might imagine in our choice of which stories to tell or where those stories end. John Arnold's addition to Oxford's popular Very Short Introductions series is a stimulating essay about how people study and understand history.

When the war broke out, Union soldiers assumed Confederate women would be innocent noncombatants. Experience soon challenged this simplistic belief. Stephanie McCurry reveals the vital and sometimes confounding roles women played on and off the battlefield. In this groundbreaking reconsideration of the Civil War, the award-winning author of Confederate Reckoning invites us to see America's bloodiest conflict not just as pitting brother against brother but as a woman's war.

Let's start with two truths about our era: We are surrounded by more readily available information than ever before. And a huge percentage of it is inaccurate. Some of the bad info is well-meaning but ignorant. Some of it is deliberately deceptive. All of it is pernicious. With the internet always at our fingertips, what's a teacher of history to do? Sam Wineburg has answers, beginning with this: If we want to educate citizens who can sift through the mass of information around them and separate fact from fake, we have to work to give them the necessary critical thinking tools.

To understand something, you need to know its history. Right? Wrong, says Alex Rosenberg in How History Gets Things Wrong. Feeling especially well-informed after reading a book of popular history on the best-seller list? Don't. Narrative history is always, always wrong. It not just incomplete or inaccurate but deeply wrong, as wrong as Ptolemaic astronomy. We no longer believe that the earth is the center of the universe. Why do we still believe in historical narrative? Our attachment to history as a vehicle for understanding has a long Darwinian pedigree and a genetic basis.

Whose Middle Ages? is an interdisciplinary collection of short, accessible essays intended for the nonspecialist listener and ideal for teaching at an undergraduate level. Each of 22 essays takes up an area where digging for meaning in the medieval past has brought something distorted back into the present: in our popular entertainment; in our news, our politics, and our propaganda; and in subtler ways that inform how we think about our histories, our countries, and ourselves. Each author looks to a history that has refused to remain past and uses the tools of the academy to read and re-read familiar stories, objects, symbols, and myths.