エピソード

  • Bridging the Divide: Envisioning an Education System that Integrates Research and Practice
    2024/04/23

    In this episode, Dr. Vanessa Rosa explores what an education system that has successfully bridged the research-practice gap would look like. She discusses three key hallmarks: prioritizing practice-based evidence, establishing systemic incentives for integration, and fostering embedded researcher-practitioner collaborations.

    🎧 Core Audience

    * Science educators seeking innovative, evidence-based teaching strategies

    * Educational researchers interested in collaborating with practitioners

    * Policymakers and administrators looking to support research-practice integration

    * STEM education advocates committed to advancing equitable, engaging learning experiences

    📋 Topics Covered

    * The research-practice gap in education and its impact on student learning

    * Critical elements of an integrated education system that bridges research and practice

    * Practice-based evidence and its role in informing evidence-based instruction

    * Systemic incentives and policies to support researcher-practitioner collaboration

    * Embedded researcher-practitioner collaborations and their benefits for education reform

    ⌚️ Helpful Time Stamps:

    00:00 - Introduction and overview

    04:16 - Visualizing a reformed system

    05:01 - Defining the research-practice gap

    07:24 - Practice-based evidence vs. evidence-based instruction

    10:49 - Systemic incentives to support integration

    13:40 - Embedded researcher-practitioner collaborations

    17:37 - Conclusion and call to action

    🗝️ Key Takeaways

    * Valuing practice-based evidence alongside controlled experiments can lead to more context-specific, effective teaching strategies.

    * Systemic incentives, such as promotion criteria, funding streams, and professional development, foster research-practice integration.

    * Embedded researcher-practitioner collaborations enable real-time problem-solving, accessible research dissemination, and continuous feedback loops.

    * Bridging the research-practice gap can create more equitable, engaging, and empowering learning environments that enable all students to thrive.

    📄 Useful Resources

    * Corresponding Blog Post: www.cuvettecollective.org/closedrpgap/

    * Cuvette Collective's professional learning community: cuvetteempowered.org

    * Cuvette Collective's consulting firm: cuvettecatalyzed.org

    * The Cuvette, a peer-reviewed journal for science education: thecuvette.org

    🎙️ About the Hosts

    Dr. Vanessa Rosa:

    * Advocate for science education reform and founder of Cuvette Collective.

    * Passionate about transforming science education and challenging academic conventions.

    * Expertise in science education research, curriculum development, and assessment.

    Connect with Dr. Rosa on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vanessarosaphd/

    🙌🏽 Support the Podcast

    Please consider subscribing or rating the podcast if you found this content helpful.

    Thank you for supporting efforts to advance science education reform and this community!



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit cuvette.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    19 分
  • Framing for positive impact
    2024/01/25

    🎯 Target Audience

    This content would be most helpful to educators, researchers, and policy makers interested in understanding the impact of different framing strategies on policy support.

    📋 Topics Covered

    1. The concept of framing and its impact on understanding and policy support,

    2. The effects of different framing strategies - empathy, interdependence, ingenuity, and prevention - on policy support, and

    3. The implications of these findings for educators and policy makers.

    ⌚️ Helpful Time Stamps:

    00:00 - Vanessa's experience as a graduate student

    01:15 - Understanding of framing

    02:49 - Discussion on empathy

    04:10 - Discussion on interdependence

    05:24 - Discussion on ingenuity

    06:31 - Discussion on prevention

    07:34 - Summary of findings

    07:54 - Implications and conclusion

    💃🏽 Call to Action

    How can we use these findings to frame our messages more effectively? How can we ensure that our framing strategies align with our audience's cultural values to promote support for systemic reform?

    Let's discuss this in the chat.

    🎙️ About the Host

    Dr. Rosa promotes equity in science education, challenging traditional norms and oppressive systems. She leads several organizations focused on empowering diverse educators and driving systemic improvements. Here, and through these organizations, she aims to foster a community of supportive educators who will transform science education and research.

    🙌🏽 Support the Podcast

    If you found this content helpful, please consider subscribing to, sharing, and rating the podcast. Subscriptions are voluntary and work to keep this content ad-free and freely available.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit cuvette.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    9 分
  • Framing for Impact
    2024/01/18
    Show Notes:Welcome to this first episode of The Collective Podcast! Here, Drs. Rosa and Corrales discuss the impact of framing a message that elicits support and action in reform.🎧 Core AudienceScience educators, researchers, and policymakers who are interested in improving science education through effective communication and framing of messages.Individuals seeking insights on how to craft compelling arguments and messages that resonate with diverse audiences.Anyone interested in the intersection of science education, communication, and social change.📋 Topics CoveredThe importance of effective framing in advancing science education reforms.The challenges of framing messages for impact in academic publishing and the tension between values and success metrics.There is a need to balance empathy, interdependence, and self-interest when framing messages.The importance of considering the intended audience and tailoring messages accordingly.The role of authenticity and values alignment ineffective framing.🗝️ Key TakeawaysEmpathy alone may not be enough: While empathy is crucial in understanding the experiences of marginalized groups, it may not be the most effective framing strategy for promoting change.Interdependence and self-interest: Framing messages around interdependence and self-interest can garner support for reforms more effectively. Emphasize how addressing inequities benefits everyone, not just the marginalized groups directly affected.Accessible language and practical solutions: Use clear and accessible language to communicate research findings and recommendations. Provide concrete examples and practical solutions that educators can quickly implement.Target the right audience: Consider your intended audience when framing your message. Tailor your language and examples to resonate with the specific group you're trying to reach.Authenticity and values alignment: Be authentic in your framing and ensure it aligns with your values and beliefs. Avoid diluting your message to appease reviewers or conform to norms.📄 Useful ResourcesHere’s the TEDx video by Dr. Nat Kendall-Taylor: How words change minds: The science of storytelling | Nat Kendall-Taylor | TEDxMidAtlanticSalonWe found the study referenced in the TEDx video: https://www.frameworksinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/AddictionValuesPaper.pdfHere’s how they defined interdependence:“Interdependence: the idea that everyone in the province has a stake in addressing addiction.”⌚️ Helpful Time Stamps:00:00 - Opening01:40 - Overview05:05 - Three questions05:47 - Question 111:24 - Successfully framing a research paper14:44 - Framing equity reforms22:34 - Should we avoid empathy?34:28 - Question 249:34 - “We’re academics, of course we…”52:16 - Academics vs. social media58:53 - Question 3🎙️ About the HostsDr. Vanessa Rosa: Connect with Dr. RosaAdvocate for science education reform and founder of Cuvette Collective.Passionate about transforming science education and challenging academic conventions.Expertise in science education research, curriculum development, and assessment.Dr. Adri Corrales: Connect with Dr. CorralesEducation researcher, educator, and director of community engagement for Cuvette Collective.Focus on equity and inclusion in science education.Expertise in qualitative research methods and critical theory.🙌🏽 Support the PodcastIf you found this content helpful, please consider subscribing to, sharing, and rating the podcast.Thank you for supporting efforts to advance science education reform and this community! This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit cuvette.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 3 分
  • Rethinking academic publishing 🏫
    2023/10/18

    🎯 Target Audience

    This content would be most helpful to scholars and researchers who publish their work in academic journals and are frustrated with the barriers it imposes on impacting their field.

    📋 Topics Covered

    In the final installment of our trilogy on academic publishing, we discuss the future of academic publishing:

    1. Where it's gone wrong,

    2. How to address it, and

    3. What scholars can do while we wait for these changes to become the norm.

    📄 Demystifying academic publishing: A Researcher's guide to ethical journals: https://www.thecuvette.org/pub/zy5kna35 (⬅️ the infographic).

    ⌚️ Helpful Time Stamps:

    00:00 - Intro

    00:37 - The roots of toxic academic publishing

    03:18 - Supplanting ethical publishing practices

    05:34 - How will we pay for publishing reform?

    11:11 - What can we do while reform becomes the norm?

    💃🏽 Call to Action

    Support alternatives to traditional academic publishers that don't paywall the work, charge authors to publish, subsume their intellectual property rights, or obscure the selection and peer review processes. Here are some examples:

    * Science Education Research: https://www.thecuvette.org

    * Pre-Print Reviews: https://prereview.org

    * Directory of Open Access Journals: https://doaj.org

    Feel free to post in the chat if you need any help finding a journal for your discipline:

    🎙️ About the Host

    Dr. Rosa promotes equity in science education, challenging traditional norms and oppressive systems. She leads several organizations focused on empowering diverse educators and driving systemic improvements. Here, and through these organizations, she aims to foster a community of supportive educators who will transform science education and research.

    🙌🏽 Support the Podcast

    If you found this content helpful, please consider subscribing to, sharing, and rating the podcast. Subscriptions are voluntary and work to keep this content ad-free and freely available.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit cuvette.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    13 分
  • Academics and the prestige trap 🎓
    2023/10/11

    🎯 Target Audience

    This content would be most helpful to those who write and research academic journals.

    📋 Topics Covered

    1. The exploitative nature of academic publishing,

    2. The role of prestige in perpetuating the system, and

    3. The impacts on stakeholders and scientific progress.

    ⌚️ Helpful Time Stamps:

    00:00 - Intro

    01:21 - Why Taxpayers Support Exploitative Publishing

    02:31 - Government Resistance to Reform

    03:49 - Why Researchers and Universities Perpetuate the System

    06:39 - The Root of the Problem: Prestige and Perceived Quality

    07:56 - Impacts on Stakeholders and Scientific Progress

    09:52 - Hopes to Align Incentives with Science Advancement

    💃🏽 Call to Action

    What do you think about the suggestions for resisting the academic publishing system from within and without academia?

    Let's talk about it in the chat.

    🎙️ About the Host

    Dr. Rosa promotes equity in science education, challenging traditional norms and oppressive systems. She leads several organizations focused on empowering diverse educators and driving systemic improvements. Here, and through these organizations, she aims to foster a community of supportive educators who will transform science education and research.

    🙌🏽 Support the Podcast

    If you found this content helpful, please consider subscribing to, sharing, and rating the podcast. Subscriptions are voluntary and work to keep this content ad-free and freely available.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit cuvette.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    10 分
  • An extractive business 📤
    2023/10/04

    🎯 Target Audience

    This content would be most helpful to those who write and research academic journals.

    📋 Topics Covered

    1. The extractive business model of traditional academic publishing,

    2. The lack of compensation for academic authors, and

    3. The high cost of journal subscriptions.

    ⌚️ Helpful Time Stamps:

    00:00 - Intro

    00:42 - Disclaimer

    01:08 - Business Model Overview

    02:16 - Example: Café

    03:32 - Academic Publishing Model

    04:30 - An Extractive Model

    05:30 - Conclusion

    💃🏽 Call to Action

    Can you think of other business models that are as extractive and unsustainable as academic publishing? Why do we, as researchers, continue to use extortive publishers to disseminate our work?

    Let's talk about it in the chat.

    🎙️ About the Host

    Dr. Rosa promotes equity in science education, challenging traditional norms and oppressive systems. She leads several organizations focused on empowering diverse educators and driving systemic improvements. Here, and through these organizations, she aims to foster a community of supportive educators who will transform science education and research.

    🙌🏽 Support the Podcast

    If you found this content helpful, please consider subscribing to, sharing, and rating the podcast. Subscriptions are voluntary and work to keep this content ad-free and freely available.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit cuvette.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    7 分
  • Positionality is credibility 👩🏽‍🏫
    2023/09/28

    🎯 Target Audience

    This content would be most helpful to researchers seeking to understand how they impact their research and content on positionality or other reflexive practices.

    📋 Topics Covered

    1. What positionality is,

    2. The controversy surrounding positionality in research, and

    3. How to write an effective positionality statement.

    ⌚️ Helpful Time Stamps:

    00:00 - Intro

    00:22 - Storytime

    03:47 - What is positionality?

    07:29 - The positionality controversy

    13:04 - Why a researcher's credibility is their positionality

    16:05 - How to write a positionality statement (10 steps)

    💃🏽 Call to Action

    Take a moment to reflect on how who you are impacts what you do as a researcher.

    Let's talk about it in the chat.

    🎙️ About the Host

    Dr. Rosa promotes equity in science education, challenging traditional norms and oppressive systems. She leads several organizations focused on empowering diverse educators and driving systemic improvements. Here, and through these organizations, she aims to foster a community of supportive educators who will transform science education and research.

    🙌🏽 Support the Podcast

    If you found this content helpful, please consider subscribing to, sharing, and rating the podcast. Subscriptions are voluntary and work to keep this content ad-free and freely available.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit cuvette.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1分未満
  • Hierarchies, from molecules to academia ⚛️
    2023/09/21

    How can natural hierarchies inform the hierarchies we create?

    🎯 Target Audience

    This content would be most helpful to scholars in the academic system (administrators, researchers, professors, and students) looking for helpful content on academic hierarchies and alternative models.

    📋 Topics Covered

    1. How natural hierarchies like molecules and cells self-organize for optimal functioning.

    2. How academic hierarchies concentrate power and can be oppressive.

    3. Alternative academic models include democratic governance, cooperatives, peer networks, open access, and restorative justice.

    ⌚️ Helpful Time Stamps

    00:00 - Intro

    00:18 - Hierarchies in the natural world...

    02:42 - Human-constructed hierarchies...

    04:03 - Comparing natural and human-made hierarchical systems...

    06:17 - This history of the academic hierarchy...

    07:11 - Alternatives to academic hierarchies...

    09:16 - Resisting the academic hierarchy from within...

    11:34 - Conclusion

    💃🏽 Call to Action

    Engage in discussions about academic hierarchies, take action within your role, and keep envisioning and building more egalitarian academic models.

    🎙️ About the Host

    Dr. Rosa promotes equity in science education, challenging traditional norms and oppressive systems. She leads several organizations focused on empowering diverse educators and driving systemic improvements. Here, and through these organizations, she aims to foster a community of supportive educators who will transform science education and research.

    🙌🏽 Support the Podcast

    If you found this content helpful, please consider subscribing to, sharing, and rating the podcast. Subscriptions are voluntary and work to keep this content ad-free and freely available.

    Don't miss our next issue! Click here to receive the newsletter: https://www.cuvettecollective.org/



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit cuvette.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分