『ONE DAY CLOSER with Mark & Dave』のカバーアート

ONE DAY CLOSER with Mark & Dave

ONE DAY CLOSER with Mark & Dave

著者： Mark & Dave
無料で聴く

Rekindling a Spirit of Hope and Truth in the Conversation by applying a Biblical perspective to current events. It's time to wake the LIONS!
web: www.onedaycloser.biz
email: odc22@proton.me
DM on IG: odc.md
X account: @odc22md

© 2026 ONE DAY CLOSER with Mark & Dave スピリチュアリティ 政治・政府 政治学 社会科学
エピソード
  • E 324: Identifying Party Differences for the 2026 Midterm Policies and Priorities by Party

    E 324: Identifying Party Differences for the 2026 Midterm Policies and Priorities by Party
    2026/09/09

    Welcome back to One Day Closer where we are rekindling a spirit of Hope and Truth into today's crazy conversations. Today, Paul will join me again as we highlight both the hot and trendy talking points by party for the upcoming 2026 midterm elections.

    What we hope to highlight is that the "trendy" slogans of the far left that promise to make everything free, does nothing to improve anything in America. It's abolish this and cancel that with no submitted ideas or thoughts as to how to reform anything. Their platform policies and priorities construct nothing. It's destructive in every sense of the word.

    The "hot" topics that actually empower our economy, paves a way to sustainable affordability and truly lifts all boats and what you'll hear from the conservative candidates. Resolving once and for all the hostage takeover of the Strait of Hormuz by Irans IRGC is job one. Addressing and ending their feeble desire to control the economies of the entire world must end. All the rationale nations of the world realize that Iran can no longer be trusted at the table.

    TRENDY but feckless positions or priorities that do not influence Economics nor improves America tend to be only offering the far left Democrat Socialist of America have to offer. Abolish everything with no ideas or thoughts to offer for making America better.

    Abolish Ice. Abolish the Senate. Abolish the Presidency. Defund the Police. Close prisons. Reopen the borders. Free Healthcare for all. Trans rights in sports. Rent freezes. Free government run grocery stores. Can you imagine what this country would look like if these crazy loons got any of these ideas implemmented?

    Communism is on the ballot.


    HOTTEST Topics effecting Midterm elections: Economic Influencing Positions / Policies

    - Resolving the Hostage taking of the Strait of Hormuz

    - Current strategy is Operation Economic Outcast

    - Returning free flow of commerce (regional stability, falling Oil prices, lower gas, new alliances)

    - Interest rates, gas prices and affordability

    - America Save Act: Secure, Fair and Transparent Voting for all American Citizens

    - Save America Act must pass

    - Meritocracy applied to Government

    - Restoring trust and confidence in our Institutions with the American people

    Visit our website at www.onedaycloser.biz

    Todays Musical Feature: Up Against the Wall Redneck Mother, Jerry Jeff Walker





    Send us Fan Mail
    続きを読む 一部表示
    47 分
  • E 323: Free Enterprise Capitalism vs Progressive Collectivism

    E 323: Free Enterprise Capitalism vs Progressive Collectivism
    2026/09/02
    Welcome to One Day Closer where we are rekindling a spirit of Hope and Truth into today’s conversations. I’m happy to have Paul back in studio today to help us dive deeper into our series on Pencil Neck Politicians, Positions and Policies. Today class we will explain the difference between Progressive Collectivism (Socialist / Communism) and Free Market Enterprise or most referred to as Capitalism.How to explain progressivism, socialism, the differences between the two and capitalism and free enterprise system? Let's first expose and debunk the myths associated with each and then take a closer look at their basic definitions. We'll do a quick and easy AI driven Google search.Progressive Collectivism defined:Progressive collectivism is a political and economic perspective that combines progressivism's focus on societal reform with collectivism's emphasis on group welfare over individual autonomy. Progressive collectivism seeks to reform capitalism through state-directed social welfare and regulation, whereas socialism seeks to completely replace capitalist private ownership with public or worker control of the economy. Core ConceptsGroup Think: Society and the community are viewed as the primary units of social organization rather than the individual.Government Intervention: An active, centralized government or administrative state is used to manage economic systems, correct market failures, and provide social safety nets.Shared Responsibility: Costs, resources, and decision-making are pooled collectively to promote social equity and public welfare. Key CharacteristicsEconomic Regulation: Advocates for critiques of unregulated capitalism, checks on corporate monopolies, and sometimes public or collective ownership of key resources.Social Equity: Focuses on group-oriented egalitarian goals, civil rights, and collective responses to systemic social issues.Administrative Expertise: Relies on government planners, experts, and bureaucratic institutions to direct social and economic progress.CriticismsLoss of Individual Liberty: Critics from individualist and libertarian viewpoints (such as Friedrich Hayek or Ludwig von Mises) argue that collective control suppresses personal sovereignty, local autonomy, and voluntary cooperation through state coercion. Concentration of Power: Detractors contend that centralizing decisions in an administrative bureaucracy transfers true power to a ruling elite rather than an autonomous collective. The difference between Progressive Collectivism and SocialismProgressive Collectivism: A reformist political approach that values individual rights while using government intervention, taxation, and social safety nets to fix the inequalities of a market economy. Socialism: An economic and political system where the means of production (such as factories, tools, and land) are owned and managed collectively by the workers or the public rather than private capitalists. Key DifferencesStance on Capitalism: Progressives want to regulate and improve capitalism so it serves the public good (e.g., through minimum wage laws and public healthcare). Socialists argue that capitalism is fundamentally exploitative and must be abolished and replaced with a democratic economic model. Scope of Government Control: Progressive collectivism relies heavily on the state, regulatory agencies, and public programs within a democratic and market framework. Socialism focuses primarily on changing who owns the economic production itself, ranging from state ownership to decentralized worker cooperatives. Ultimate Goal: Progressivism aims for a fairer, more equitable society with strong social safety nets. Socialism aims to end class distinctions created by private property and profit-driven enterpriseFree Market Enterprise / Capitalism defined:Free market enterprise capitalism is an economic system where private individuals own businesses and prices are set by supply and demand with little government control.Key Parts of Free Market EnterpriseSupply and Demand: Buyers and sellers set prices together based on what people want and what is available.Private Property: People and companies own land, tools, and buildings instead of the government.Voluntary Exchange: Trades and business deals happen freely when both sides agree it helps them.Competition: Businesses rival each other for customers, which can lead to better products and lower prices.Main Ideas in ActionChoice: Workers pick their jobs, and owners pick what to sell.Profit: Making money is the main goal and reward for business owners.Low Regulation: The government stays out of everyday business choicesCore PrinciplesPrivate property: Individuals and companies own land, tools, and buildings instead of the government.Profit motive: The desire to make money drives businesses to work efficiently and create new products, competitive products and superior products.Voluntary exchange: Buyers and sellers make deals freely when both sides ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    35 分
  • E 322: Messaging, Propaganda and Demographics

    E 322: Messaging, Propaganda and Demographics
    2026/08/26
    Welcome to One Day Closer where we are rekindling a spirit of Hope and Truth into today’s conversations. I’m happy to have Paul back in studio today to help us dive deeper into Messaging, Propaganda, Demographics and understanding the nonsense behind Polls.Last week we covered the topic of American Exceptionalism and how American Values differ from the ideals of Fascism. We also debunked the claims by the DSA and the loonie left that Trump was a King, a dictator, a fascist. Paul did a great job highlighting some of the real fascist and dictators of the past. After that show went live, I received an email from PragerU, with a link to one of their videos entitled “The Dark Legacies of History's Monsters.” I highly recommend you go check it out. I’ll leave a link at the bottom of our show notes so you can check it out. Here’s a brief teaser from the email I received.Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong, Fidel Castro, and Pol Pot. Together they were responsible for the bloodiest century in world history. This 6-part series reveals the truth about these notorious dictators, the consequences of their murderous regimes, and why it’s important for us to never forget what they did.Like I said in episode 319, I’ve watching news regularly for nearing 26 years. Before cable news became a thing, you were limited to sources like ABC, NBC, and CNN. But when these main stream channels started airing “feel good detraction pieces” instead of covering important news breaking relevant information, I moved over to FOX. They claimed to be offering “Fair and Balanced” journalism.NEWSMAX is where I turn to now for 90% of my news. This is cable new and they boast having over 40 million viewers now that they are a publicly traded news outlet. Ed Henry (former Fox reporter but at Newsmax he has a personality), Carl Higbie (a former Navy Seal), Rob Schmidt (pretty straight forward host), Rob Finnerty (can be a pretty funny guy and he has some funny voices to help him highlight a story), Greg Kelly and Greta Van Susteren.CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, MS NOW are the fake news Trumps always referring to and here’s why.They don’t site sources, they refer to science and studies but never name them. They purposely use story or article headings like: “vehicle drives into crowd of onlookers” or “man snatched up by ICE in a quiet neighborhood.” Question. Did the vehicle just start itself up and drive into the crowd or did a “person” drive the vehicle into the crowd? Was it a man, woman or something else? What was the persons ethnicity, race, or motive? What kind of crowd was mowed down? Were they July 4th parade participants or a vigilante group? These are important details. You simply cannot read a headline and assume it’s accurate or even close. The odds are it’s bias from the get go IF it’s coming from the lame street media outlets. They have been far left for decades.49 Million Young People Will Be Eligible to Vote in the 2026 MidtermsYouth ages 18-29 are a large, powerful, and diverse voting bloc that can use their voice to shape electoral outcomes. By November, close to 8.5 million youth will have aged into the electorate since the 2024 presidential election. They join the 41 million voting-age members of Gen Z who were eligible to cast ballots in 2024. Gen Z now makes up the entire 18-29 age cohort.About 47% of the 49 million young people who will be eligible to vote in 2026 are youth of color, including approximately 10.8 million Latino youth, 6.6 million Black youth, 2.6 million multiracial youth, and 2.2 million Asian youth. The 2026 youth electorate is also diverse when it comes to college experience. 48% of eligible young voters in 2026 have college experience, while 51% do not. Youth without college experience have less access to political information, and appear to have lower access to the kinds of support and resources that lead to consistent civic engagement according to the article I’m referencing.. That historically leads to lower turnout among “non-college” youth.Turnout in midterm elections tends to be relatively low – much lower than in presidential elections– so the subset of people who actually cast ballots may look different from all registered voters.How did polls fair in calling midterm primaries?Recent polling misses in Wisconsin & Michigan renewed a familiar question. How much confidence should voters put in political polls?Not much. Just recently an investigation of US Senate polling shows 73% of surveys overstate the levels of support for Democrats.In Wisconsin’s Democratic primary, Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley pulled off a dramatic upset over state Rep. Francesca Hong. Crowley won with about 40% of the vote, narrowly edging Hong, despite polls showing Hong with a substantial lead in the final weeks. Michigan offered another example of the difficulty of primary polling.Abdul ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    43 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません